Study of e+e−→ppˉe^+e^- \rightarrow p\bar{p} in the vicinity of ψ(3770)ψ(3770)

preprint2014arXivOpen access
BESIII CollaborationM. AblikimM. N. AchasovX. C. AiO. AlbayrakM. AlbrechtD. J. AmbroseF. F. AnQ. AnJ. Z. BaiR. Baldini FerroliY. BanJ. V. BennettM. BertaniJ. M. BianE. BogerO. BondarenkoI. BoykoS. BraunR. A. BriereH. CaiX. CaiO. CakirA. CalcaterraG. F. CaoS. A. CetinJ. F. ChangG. ChelkovG. ChenH. S. ChenJ. C. ChenM. L. ChenS. J. ChenX. ChenX. R. ChenY. B. ChenH. P. ChengX. K. ChuY. P. ChuD. Cronin-HennessyH. L. DaiJ. P. DaiD. DedovichZ. Y. DengA. DenigI. DenysenkoM. DestefanisW. M. DingY. DingC. DongJ. DongL. Y. DongM. Y. DongS. X. DuJ. Z. FanJ. FangS. S. FangY. FangL. FavaC. Q. FengC. D. FuO. FuksQ. GaoY. GaoC. GengK. GoetzenW. X. GongW. GradlM. GrecoM. H. GuY. T. GuY. H. GuanL. B. GuoT. GuoY. P. GuoY. L. HanF. A. HarrisK. L. HeM. HeZ. Y. HeT. HeldY. K. HengZ. L. HouC. HuH. M. HuJ. F. HuT. HuG. M. HuangG. S. HuangH. P. HuangJ. S. HuangL. HuangX. T. HuangY. HuangT. HussainC. S. JiQ. JiQ. P. JiX. B. JiX. L. JiL. L. JiangL. W. JiangX. S. JiangJ. B. JiaoZ. JiaoD. P. JinS. JinT. JohanssonN. Kalantar-NayestanakiX. L. KangX. S. KangM. KavatsyukB. KlossB. KopfM. KornicerW. KuehnA. KupscW. LaiJ. S. LangeM. LaraP. LarinM. LeyheC. H. LiCheng LiCui LiD. LiD. M. LiF. LiG. LiH. B. LiJ. C. LiK. LiLei LiP. R. LiQ. J. LiT. LiW. D. LiW. G. LiX. L. LiX. N. LiX. Q. LiZ. B. LiH. LiangY. F. LiangY. T. LiangD. X. LinB. J. LiuC. L. LiuC. X. LiuF. H. LiuFang LiuFeng LiuH. B. LiuH. H. LiuH. M. LiuJ. LiuJ. P. LiuK. LiuK. Y. LiuP. L. LiuQ. LiuS. B. LiuX. LiuY. B. LiuZ. A. LiuZhiqiang LiuZhiqing LiuH. LoehnerX. C. LouG. R. LuH. J. LuH. L. LuJ. G. LuX. R. LuY. LuY. P. LuC. L. LuoM. X. LuoT. LuoX. L. LuoM. LvF. C. MaH. L. MaQ. M. MaS. MaT. MaX. Y. MaF. E. MaasM. MaggioraQ. A. MalikY. J. MaoZ. P. MaoJ. G. MesschendorpJ. MinT. J. MinR. E. MitchellX. H. MoY. J. MoH. MoeiniC. Morales MoralesK. MoriyaN. Yu. MuchnoiH. MuramatsuY. NefedovF. NerlingI. B. NikolaevZ. NingS. NisarX. Y. NiuS. L. OlsenQ. OuyangS. PacettiM. PelizaeusH. P. PengK. PetersJ. L. PingR. G. PingR. PolingM. QiS. QianC. F. QiaoL. Q. QinN. QinX. S. QinY. QinZ. H. QinJ. F. QiuK. H. RashidC. F. RedmerM. RipkaG. RongX. D. RuanA. SarantsevK. SchoenningS. SchumannW. ShanM. ShaoC. P. ShenX. Y. ShenH. Y. ShengM. R. ShepherdW. M. SongX. Y. SongS. SpataroB. SpruckG. X. SunJ. F. SunS. S. SunY. J. SunY. Z. SunZ. J. SunZ. T. SunC. J. TangX. TangI. TapanE. H. ThorndikeD. TothM. UllrichI. UmanG. S. VarnerB. WangD. WangD. Y. WangK. WangL. L. WangL. S. WangM. WangP. WangP. L. WangQ. J. WangS. G. WangW. WangX. F. WangY. D. WangY. F. WangY. Q. WangZ. WangZ. G. WangZ. H. WangZ. Y. WangD. H. WeiJ. B. WeiP. WeidenkaffS. P. WenM. WernerU. WiednerM. WolkeL. H. WuN. WuZ. WuL. G. XiaY. XiaD. XiaoZ. J. XiaoY. G. XieQ. L. XiuG. F. XuL. XuQ. J. XuQ. N. XuX. P. XuZ. XueL. YanW. B. YanW. C. YanY. H. YanH. X. YangL. YangY. YangY. X. YangH. YeM. YeM. H. YeB. X. YuC. X. YuH. W. YuJ. S. YuS. P. YuC. Z. YuanW. L. YuanY. YuanA. YuncuA. A. ZafarA. ZalloS. L. ZangY. ZengB. X. ZhangB. Y. ZhangC. ZhangC. B. ZhangC. C. ZhangD. H. ZhangH. H. ZhangH. Y. ZhangJ. J. ZhangJ. Q. ZhangJ. W. ZhangJ. Y. ZhangJ. Z. ZhangS. H. ZhangX. J. ZhangX. Y. ZhangY. ZhangY. H. ZhangZ. H. ZhangZ. P. ZhangZ. Y. ZhangG. ZhaoJ. W. ZhaoLei ZhaoLing ZhaoM. G. ZhaoQ. ZhaoQ. W. ZhaoS. J. ZhaoT. C. ZhaoX. H. ZhaoY. B. ZhaoZ. G. ZhaoA. ZhemchugovB. ZhengJ. P. ZhengY. H. ZhengB. ZhongL. ZhouLi ZhouX. ZhouX. K. ZhouX. R. ZhouX. Y. ZhouK. ZhuK. J. ZhuX. L. ZhuY. C. ZhuY. S. ZhuZ. A. ZhuJ. ZhuangB. S. ZouJ. H. Zou

Abstract

Using 2917 pb−1\rm{pb}^{-1} of data accumulated at 3.773~GeV\rm{GeV}, 44.5~pb−1\rm{pb}^{-1} of data accumulated at 3.65~GeV\rm{GeV} and data accumulated during a ψ(3770)ψ(3770) line-shape scan with the BESIII detector, the reaction e+e−→ppˉe^+e^-\rightarrow p\bar{p} is studied considering a possible interference between resonant and continuum amplitudes. The cross section of e+e−→ψ(3770)→ppˉe^+e^-\rightarrowψ(3770)\rightarrow p\bar{p}, σ(e+e−→ψ(3770)→ppˉ)σ(e^+e^-\rightarrowψ(3770)\rightarrow p\bar{p}), is found to have two solutions, determined to be (0.059±0.032±0.0120.059\pm0.032\pm0.012) pb with the phase angle ϕ=(255.8±37.9±4.8)∘ϕ= (255.8\pm37.9\pm4.8)^\circ (<<0.11 pb at the 90% confidence level), or σ(e+e−→ψ(3770)→ppˉ)=(2.57±0.12±0.12σ(e^+e^-\rightarrowψ(3770)\rightarrow p\bar{p}) = (2.57\pm0.12\pm0.12) pb with ϕ=(266.9±6.1±0.9)∘ϕ= (266.9\pm6.1\pm0.9)^\circ both of which agree with a destructive interference. Using the obtained cross section of ψ(3770)→ppˉψ(3770)\rightarrow p\bar{p}, the cross section of ppˉ→ψ(3770)p\bar{p}\rightarrow ψ(3770), which is useful information for the future PANDA experiment, is estimated to be either (9.8±5.79.8\pm5.7) nb (<17.2<17.2 nb at 90% C.L.) or (425.6±42.9)(425.6\pm42.9) nb.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.