Paper detail

The study of $γγ\toγψ(2S)$ at Belle

Using $980~\rm fb^{-1}$ of data on and around the $Υ(nS)(n=1,2,3,4,5)$ resonances collected with the Belle detector at the KEKB asymmetric-energy $e^+e^-$ collider, the two-photon process $γγ\to γψ(2S)$ is studied from the threshold to $4.2~{\rm GeV}$ for the first time. Two structures are seen in the invariant mass distribution of $γψ(2S)$: one at $M_{R_1} = 3922.4\pm 6.5 \pm 2.0~{\rm MeV}/c^2$ with a width of $Γ_{R_1} = 22\pm 17\pm 4~{\rm MeV}$, and another at $M_{R_2} = 4014.3\pm 4.0 \pm 1.5~{\rm MeV}/c^2$ with a width of $Γ_{R_2} = 4\pm 11 \pm 6~{\rm MeV}$; the signals are parametrized with the incoherent sum of two Breit-Wigner functions. The first structure is consistent with the $X(3915)$ or the $χ_{c2}(3930)$, and the local statistical significance is determined to be $3.1σ$ with the systematic uncertainties included. The second matches none of the known charmonium or charmoniumlike states, and its global significance is determined to be $2.8σ$ including the look-elsewhere effect. The production rates are $Γ_{γγ}{\cal B}(R_1\toγψ(2S)) = 9.8\pm 3.6\pm 1.2~{\rm eV}$ assuming $(J^{PC}, |λ|) =(0^{++}, 0)$ or $2.0\pm 0.7\pm 0.2~{\rm eV}$ with $(2^{++}, 2)$ for the first structure and $Γ_{γγ}{\cal B}(R_2\toγψ(2S)) = 6.2\pm 2.2\pm 0.8~{\rm eV}$ with $(0^{++}, 0)$ or $1.2\pm 0.4\pm 0.2~{\rm eV}$ with $(2^{++}, 2)$ for the second one. Here, the first errors are statistical and the second systematic, and $λ$ is the helicity.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
X. L. WangB. S. GaoW. J. ZhuI. AdachiH. AiharaS. Al SaidD. M. AsnerH. AtmacanV. AulchenkoT. AushevR. AyadV. BabuS. BahinipatiP. BeheraV. BhardwajB. BhuyanT. BilkaJ. BiswalA. BobrovG. BonviciniA. BozekM. BračkoM. CampajolaD. ČervenkovM. -C. ChangV. ChekelianA. ChenB. G. CheonK. ChilikinH. E. ChoK. ChoS. -K. ChoiY. ChoiS. ChoudhuryD. CinabroS. CunliffeS. DasG. De NardoR. DhamijaF. Di CapuaZ. DoležalT. V. DongS. EidelmanT. FerberD. FerlewiczA. FreyB. G. FulsomR. GargV. GaurN. GabyshevA. GarmashA. GiriP. GoldenzweigB. GolobC. HadjivasiliouT. HaraO. HartbrichK. HayasakaH. HayashiiM. T. HedgesW. -S. HouC. -L. HsuT. IijimaK. InamiA. IshikawaR. ItohM. IwasakiY. IwasakiW. W. JacobsS. JiaY. JinC. W. JooK. K. JooJ. KahnK. H. KangT. KawasakiC. KieslingC. H. KimD. Y. KimS. H. KimY. -K. KimP. KodyšT. KonnoA. KorobovS. KorparE. KovalenkoP. KrižanR. KroegerP. KrokovnyR. KulasiriM. KumarR. KumarK. KumaraA. KuzminY. -J. KwonK. LalwaniJ. S. LangeI. S. LeeS. C. LeeP. LewisJ. LiL. K. LiY. B. LiL. Li GioiJ. LibbyK. LieretD. LiventsevC. MacQueenM. MasudaT. MatsudaD. MatvienkoM. MerolaF. MetznerK. MiyabayashiR. MizukG. B. MohantyM. MrvarR. MussaM. NakaoZ. NatkaniecA. NatochiiL. NayakM. NayakM. NiiyamaN. K. NisarS. NishidaK. NishimuraS. OgawaH. OnoY. OnukiP. OskinP. PakhlovG. PakhlovaT. PangS. PardiH. ParkS. -H. ParkS. PatraS. PaulT. K. PedlarR. PestotnikL. E. PiilonenT. PodobnikV. PopovE. PrencipeM. T. PrimM. RöhrkenA. RostomyanN. RoutG. RussoD. SahooS. SandilyaA. SangalL. SanteljT. SanukiG. SchnellC. SchwandaY. SeinoK. SenyoM. E. SeviorM. ShapkinC. SharmaC. P. ShenJ. -G. ShiuB. ShwartzF. SimonJ. B. SinghA. SokolovE. SolovievaS. StaničM. StaričZ. S. StottlerM. SumihamaM. TakizawaU. TamponiF. TenchiniM. UchidaS. UeharaT. UglovY. UnnoS. UnoP. UrquijoY. UsovR. van TonderG. VarnerA. VossenE. WaheedC. H. WangM. -Z. WangP. WangM. WatanabeS. WatanukiO. WerbyckaE. WonX. XuW. YanS. B. YangH. YeJ. H. YinC. Z. YuanZ. P. ZhangV. ZhilichV. Zhukova
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

X. L. WangB. S. GaoW. J. ZhuI. AdachiH. AiharaS. Al SaidD. M. AsnerH. AtmacanV. AulchenkoT. AushevR. AyadV. BabuS. BahinipatiP. BeheraV. BhardwajB. BhuyanT. BilkaJ. BiswalA. BobrovG. BonviciniA. BozekM. BračkoM. CampajolaD. ČervenkovM. -C. ChangV. ChekelianA. ChenB. G. CheonK. ChilikinH. E. ChoK. ChoS. -K. ChoiY. ChoiS. ChoudhuryD. CinabroS. CunliffeS. DasG. De NardoR. DhamijaF. Di CapuaZ. DoležalT. V. DongS. EidelmanT. FerberD. FerlewiczA. FreyB. G. FulsomR. GargV. GaurN. GabyshevA. GarmashA. GiriP. GoldenzweigB. GolobC. HadjivasiliouT. HaraO. HartbrichK. HayasakaH. HayashiiM. T. HedgesW. -S. HouC. -L. HsuT. IijimaK. InamiA. IshikawaR. ItohM. IwasakiY. IwasakiW. W. JacobsS. JiaY. JinC. W. JooK. K. JooJ. KahnK. H. KangT. KawasakiC. KieslingC. H. KimD. Y. KimS. H. KimY. -K. KimP. KodyšT. KonnoA. KorobovS. KorparE. KovalenkoP. KrižanR. KroegerP. KrokovnyR. KulasiriM. KumarR. KumarK. KumaraA. KuzminY. -J. KwonK. LalwaniJ. S. LangeI. S. LeeS. C. LeeP. LewisJ. LiL. K. LiY. B. LiL. Li GioiJ. LibbyK. LieretD. LiventsevC. MacQueenM. MasudaT. MatsudaD. MatvienkoM. MerolaF. MetznerK. MiyabayashiR. MizukG. B. MohantyM. MrvarR. MussaM. NakaoZ. NatkaniecA. NatochiiL. NayakM. NayakM. NiiyamaN. K. NisarS. NishidaK. NishimuraS. OgawaH. OnoY. OnukiP. OskinP. PakhlovG. PakhlovaT. PangS. PardiH. ParkS. -H. ParkS. PatraS. PaulT. K. PedlarR. PestotnikL. E. PiilonenT. PodobnikV. PopovE. PrencipeM. T. PrimM. RöhrkenA. RostomyanN. RoutG. RussoD. SahooS. SandilyaA. SangalL. SanteljT. SanukiG. SchnellC. SchwandaY. SeinoK. SenyoM. E. SeviorM. ShapkinC. SharmaC. P. ShenJ. -G. ShiuB. ShwartzF. SimonJ. B. SinghA. SokolovE. SolovievaS. StaničM. StaričZ. S. StottlerM. SumihamaM. TakizawaU. TamponiF. TenchiniM. UchidaS. UeharaT. UglovY. UnnoS. UnoP. UrquijoY. UsovR. van TonderG. VarnerA. VossenE. WaheedC. H. WangM. -Z. WangP. WangM. WatanabeS. WatanukiO. WerbyckaE. WonX. XuW. YanS. B. YangH. YeJ. H. YinC. Z. YuanZ. P. ZhangV. ZhilichV. Zhukova

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.