Paper detail

Modeling the triple-GEM detector response to background particles for the CMS Experiment

An estimate of environmental background hit rate on triple-GEM chambers is performed using Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and compared to data taken by test chambers installed in the CMS experiment (GE1/1) during Run-2 at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The hit rate is measured using data collected with proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV and a luminosity of 1.5$\times10^{34}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. The simulation framework uses a combination of the FLUKA and Geant4 packages to obtain the hit rate. FLUKA provides the radiation environment around the GE1/1 chambers, which is comprised of the particle flux with momentum direction and energy spectra ranging from $10^{-11}$ to $10^{4}$ MeV for neutrons, $10^{-3}$ to $10^{4}$ MeV for $γ$'s, $10^{-2}$ to $10^{4}$ MeV for $e^{\pm}$, and $10^{-1}$ to $10^{4}$ MeV for charged hadrons. Geant4 provides an estimate of detector response (sensitivity) based on an accurate description of detector geometry, material composition and interaction of particles with the various detector layers. The MC simulated hit rate is estimated as a function of the perpendicular distance from the beam line and agrees with data within the assigned uncertainties of 10-14.5%. This simulation framework can be used to obtain a reliable estimate of background rates expected at the High Luminosity LHC.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
M. AbbasM. AbbresciaH. AbdallaA. AbdelalimS. AbuZeidA. AgapitosA. AhmadA. AhmedW. AhmedC. AimèC. ArutaI. AsgharP. AspellC. AvilaI. AzhgireyJ. BabbarY. BanR. BandS. BansalL. BenussiV. BhatnagarM. BiancoS. BiancoK. BlackL. BorgonoviO. BouhaliA. BraghieriS. BraibantS. ButallaS. CalzaferriM. CaponeroF. CasseseA. CastanedaN. CavalloS. S. ChauhanA. ColaleoA. Conde GarciaM. DalchenkoA. De IorioG. De LentdeckerD. Dell OlioG. De RobertisW. DharmaratnaS. DildickB. DorneyR. ErbacherF. FabozziF. FallavollitaA. FerraroD. FiorinaE. FontanesiM. FrancoC. GalloniP. GiacomelliS. GigliJ. GilmoreM. GolaM. GruchalaA. GutierrezR. HadjiiskaT. HakkarainenJ. HauserK. HoepfnerM. HohlmannH. HooraniT. HuangP. IaydjievA. IrshadA. IorioF. IvoneJ. JaramilloV. JhaA. JuodagalvisE. JuskaB. KailasapathyT. KamonY. KangP. KarchinA. KaurH. KaurH. KellerH. KimJ. KimS. KimB. KoA. KumarS. KumarH. KumawatN. LacalamitaJ. S. H. LeeA. LevinQ. LiF. LicciulliL. ListaK. LiyanageF. LoddoM. LuhachM. MaggiY. MaghrbiN. MajumdarK. MalagalageS. MalhotraS. MallowsS. MartiradonnaN. MccollC. McLeanJ. MerlinM. MishevaD. MishraG. MocellinL. MoureauxA. MuhammadS. MuhammadS. MukhopadhyayM. NaimuddinP. NetrakantiS. NuzzoR. OliveiraL. PantP. PaolucciI. C. ParkL. PassamontiG. PasseggioA. PeckA. PellecchiaN. PereraL. PetreH. PetrowD. PiccoloD. PierluigiG. RaffoneM. RahmaniF. RamirezA. RanieriG. RashevskiB. RegneryM. RessegottiC. RiccardiM. RodozovE. RomanoC. RoskasB. RossiP. RoutD. RoyJ. D. RuizA. RussoA. SafonovA. K. SahotaD. SaltzbergG. SavianoA. ShahA. SharmaR. SharmaT. SheokandM. ShopovaF. SimoneJ. SinghU. SonnadaraE. StarlingB. StoneJ. SturdyG. SultanovZ. SzillasiD. TeagueD. TeyssierT. TuuvaM. TytgatI. VaiN. VanegasR. VendittiP. VerwilligenW. VetensA. K. VirdiP. VituloA. WajidD. WangK. WangI. J. WatsonN. WickramageW. JangD. D. C. WickramarathnaS. YangY. YangU. YangJ. YonghoI. YoonZ. YouI. YuS. Zaleski
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

M. AbbasM. AbbresciaH. AbdallaA. AbdelalimS. AbuZeidA. AgapitosA. AhmadA. AhmedW. AhmedC. AimèC. ArutaI. AsgharP. AspellC. AvilaI. AzhgireyJ. BabbarY. BanR. BandS. BansalL. BenussiV. BhatnagarM. BiancoS. BiancoK. BlackL. BorgonoviO. BouhaliA. BraghieriS. BraibantS. ButallaS. CalzaferriM. CaponeroF. CasseseA. CastanedaN. CavalloS. S. ChauhanA. ColaleoA. Conde GarciaM. DalchenkoA. De IorioG. De LentdeckerD. Dell OlioG. De RobertisW. DharmaratnaS. DildickB. DorneyR. ErbacherF. FabozziF. FallavollitaA. FerraroD. FiorinaE. FontanesiM. FrancoC. GalloniP. GiacomelliS. GigliJ. GilmoreM. GolaM. GruchalaA. GutierrezR. HadjiiskaT. HakkarainenJ. HauserK. HoepfnerM. HohlmannH. HooraniT. HuangP. IaydjievA. IrshadA. IorioF. IvoneJ. JaramilloV. JhaA. JuodagalvisE. JuskaB. KailasapathyT. KamonY. KangP. KarchinA. KaurH. KaurH. KellerH. KimJ. KimS. KimB. KoA. KumarS. KumarH. KumawatN. LacalamitaJ. S. H. LeeA. LevinQ. LiF. LicciulliL. ListaK. LiyanageF. LoddoM. LuhachM. MaggiY. MaghrbiN. MajumdarK. MalagalageS. MalhotraS. MallowsS. MartiradonnaN. MccollC. McLeanJ. MerlinM. MishevaD. MishraG. MocellinL. MoureauxA. MuhammadS. MuhammadS. MukhopadhyayM. NaimuddinP. NetrakantiS. NuzzoR. OliveiraL. PantP. PaolucciI. C. ParkL. PassamontiG. PasseggioA. PeckA. PellecchiaN. PereraL. PetreH. PetrowD. PiccoloD. PierluigiG. RaffoneM. RahmaniF. RamirezA. RanieriG. RashevskiB. RegneryM. RessegottiC. RiccardiM. RodozovE. RomanoC. RoskasB. RossiP. RoutD. RoyJ. D. RuizA. RussoA. SafonovA. K. SahotaD. SaltzbergG. SavianoA. ShahA. SharmaR. SharmaT. SheokandM. ShopovaF. SimoneJ. SinghU. SonnadaraE. StarlingB. StoneJ. SturdyG. SultanovZ. SzillasiD. TeagueD. TeyssierT. TuuvaM. TytgatI. VaiN. VanegasR. VendittiP. VerwilligenW. VetensA. K. VirdiP. VituloA. WajidD. WangK. WangI. J. WatsonN. WickramageW. JangD. D. C. WickramarathnaS. YangY. YangU. YangJ. YonghoI. YoonZ. YouI. YuS. Zaleski

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.