BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Pawel Pralat

Pawel Pralat contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.COmath.PRDiscrete MathematicsSocial and Information NetworksData Structures and AlgorithmsMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
11works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

11 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Fully Adaptive Strategy for Hamiltonian Cycles in the Semi-Random Graph Process

The semi-random graph process is a single player game in which the player is initially presented an empty graph on $n$ vertices. In each round, a vertex $u$ is presented to the player independently and uniformly at random. The player then adaptively selects a vertex $v$, and adds the edge $uv$ to the graph. For a fixed monotone graph property, the objective of the player is to force the graph to satisfy this property with high probability in as few rounds as possible. We focus on the problem of constructing a Hamiltonian cycle in as few rounds as possible. In particular, we present an adaptive strategy for the player which achieves it in $αn$ rounds, where $α< 2.01678$ is derived from the solution to some system of differential equations. We also show that the player cannot achieve the desired property in less than $βn$ rounds, where $β> 1.26575$. These results improve the previously best known bounds and, as a result, the gap between the upper and lower bounds is decreased from 1.39162 to 0.75102.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Broadcasting on Paths and Cycles

Consider the following broadcasting process run on a connected graph $G=(V,E)$. Suppose that $k \ge 2$ agents start on vertices selected from $V$ uniformly and independently at random. One of the agents has a message that she wants to communicate to the other agents. All agents perform independent random walks on $G$, with the message being passed when an agent that knows the message meets an agent that does not know the message. The broadcasting time $ξ(G,k)$ is the time it takes to spread the message to all agents. We provide tight bounds for $ξ(P_n,k)$ and $ξ(C_n,k)$ that hold asymptotically almost surely for the whole range of the parameter~$k$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Localization Game for Random Geometric Graphs

The localization game is a two player combinatorial game played on a graph $G=(V,E)$. The cops choose a set of vertices $S_1 \subseteq V$ with $|S_1|=k$. The robber then chooses a vertex $v \in V$ whose location is hidden from the cops, but the cops learn the graph distance between the current position of the robber and the vertices in $S_1$. If this information is sufficient to locate the robber, the cops win immediately; otherwise the cops choose another set of vertices $S_2 \subseteq V$ with $|S_2|=k$, and the robber may move to a neighbouring vertex. The new distances are presented to the robber, and if the cops can deduce the new location of the robber based on all information they accumulated thus far, then they win; otherwise, a new round begins. If the robber has a strategy to avoid being captured, then she wins. The localization number is defined to be the smallest integer $k$ so that the cops win the game. In this paper we determine the localization number (up to poly-logarithmic factors) of the random geometric graph $G \in \mathcal G(n,r)$ slightly above the connectivity threshold.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Perfect Matchings in the Semi-random Graph Process

The semi-random graph process is a single player game in which the player is initially presented an empty graph on $n$ vertices. In each round, a vertex $u$ is presented to the player independently and uniformly at random. The player then adaptively selects a vertex $v$, and adds the edge $uv$ to the graph. For a fixed monotone graph property, the objective of the player is to force the graph to satisfy this property with high probability in as few rounds as possible. We focus on the problem of constructing a perfect matching in as few rounds as possible. In particular, we present an adaptive strategy for the player which achieves a perfect matching in $βn$ rounds, where the value of $β< 1.206$ is derived from a solution to some system of differential equations. This improves upon the previously best known upper bound of $(1+2/e+o(1)) \, n < 1.736 \, n$ rounds. We also improve the previously best lower bound of $(\ln 2 + o(1)) \, n > 0.693 \, n$ and show that the player cannot achieve the desired property in less than $αn$ rounds, where the value of $α> 0.932$ is derived from a solution to another system of differential equations. As a result, the gap between the upper and lower bounds is decreased roughly four times.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Hamilton Cycles in the Semi-random Graph Process

The semi-random graph process is a single player game in which the player is initially presented an empty graph on $n$ vertices. In each round, a vertex $u$ is presented to the player independently and uniformly at random. The player then adaptively selects a vertex $v$, and adds the edge $uv$ to the graph. For a fixed monotone graph property, the objective of the player is to force the graph to satisfy this property with high probability in as few rounds as possible. We focus on the problem of constructing a Hamilton cycle in as few rounds as possible. In particular, we present a novel strategy for the player which achieves a Hamiltonian cycle in $(2+4e^{-2}+0.07+o(1)) \, n < 2.61135 \, n$ rounds, assuming that a specific non-convex optimization problem has a negative solution (a premise we numerically support). Assuming that this technical condition holds, this improves upon the previously best known upper bound of $3 \, n$ rounds. We also show that the previously best lower bound of $(\ln 2 + \ln (1+\ln 2) + o(1)) \, n$ is not tight.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Localization Game for Random Graphs

We consider the localization game played on graphs in which a cop tries to determine the exact location of an invisible robber by exploiting distance probes. The corresponding graph parameter $ζ(G)$ for a given graph $G$ is called the localization number. In this paper, we improve the bounds for dense random graphs determining an asymptotic behaviour of $ζ(G)$. Moreover, we extend the argument to sparse graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On Broadcasting Time in the Model of Travelling Agents

Consider the following broadcasting process run on a connected graph $G=(V,E)$. Suppose that $k \ge 2$ agents start on vertices selected from $V$ uniformly and independently at random. One of the agents has a message that she wants to communicate to the other agents. All agents perform independent random walks on $G$, with the message being passed when an agent that knows the message meets an agent that does not know the message. The broadcasting time $ξ(G,k)$ is the time it takes to spread the message to all agents. Our ultimate goal is to gain a better understanding of the broadcasting process run on real-world networks of roads of large cities that might shed some light on the behaviour of future autonomous and connected vehicles. Due to the complexity of road networks, such phenomena have to be studied using simulation in practical applications. In this paper, we study the process on the simplest scenario, i.e., the family of complete graphs, as in this case the problem is analytically tractable. We provide tight bounds for $ξ(K_n,k)$ that hold asymptotically almost surely for the whole range of the parameter $k$. These theoretical results reveal interesting relationships and, at the same time, are also helpful to understand and explain the behaviour we observe in more realistic networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Probabilistically Faulty Searching on a Half-Line

We study $p$-Faulty Search, a variant of the classic cow-path optimization problem, where a unit speed robot searches the half-line (or $1$-ray) for a hidden item. The searcher is probabilistically faulty, and detection of the item with each visitation is an independent Bernoulli trial whose probability of success $p$ is known. The objective is to minimize the worst case expected detection time, relative to the distance of the hidden item to the origin. A variation of the same problem was first proposed by Gal in 1980. Then in 2003, Alpern and Gal [The Theory of Search Games and Rendezvous] proposed a so-called monotone solution for searching the line ($2$-rays); that is, a trajectory in which the newly searched space increases monotonically in each ray and in each iteration. Moreover, they conjectured that an optimal trajectory for the $2$-rays problem must be monotone. We disprove this conjecture when the search domain is the half-line ($1$-ray). We provide a lower bound for all monotone algorithms, which we also match with an upper bound. Our main contribution is the design and analysis of a sequence of refined search strategies, outside the family of monotone algorithms, which we call $t$-sub-monotone algorithms. Such algorithms induce performance that is strictly decreasing with $t$, and for all $p \in (0,1)$. The value of $t$ quantifies, in a certain sense, how much our algorithms deviate from being monotone, demonstrating that monotone algorithms are sub-optimal when searching the half-line.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Unit Acquisition Number of Binomial Random Graphs

Let $G$ be a graph in which each vertex initially has weight 1. In each step, the unit weight from a vertex $u$ to a neighbouring vertex $v$ can be moved, provided that the weight on $v$ is at least as large as the weight on $u$. The unit acquisition number of $G$, denoted by $a_u(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of the set of vertices with positive weight at the end of the process (over all acquisition protocols). In this paper, we investigate the Erdős-Rényi random graph process $(\mathcal{G}(n,m))_{m =0}^{N}$, where $N = {n \choose 2}$. We show that asymptotically almost surely $a_u(\mathcal{G}(n,m)) = 1$ right at the time step the random graph process creates a connected graph. Since trivially $a_u(\mathcal{G}(n,m)) \ge 2$ if the graphs is disconnected, the result holds in the strongest possible sense.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

An Unsupervised Framework for Comparing Graph Embeddings

Graph embedding is a transformation of vertices of a graph into set of vectors. Good embeddings should capture the graph topology, vertex-to-vertex relationship, and other relevant information about graphs, subgraphs, and vertices. If these objectives are achieved, they are meaningful, understandable, and compressed representations of networks. They also provide more options and tools for data scientists as machine learning on graphs is still quite limited. Finally, vector operations are simpler and faster than comparable operations on graphs. The main challenge is that one needs to make sure that embeddings well describe the properties of the graphs. In particular, the decision has to be made on the embedding dimensionality which highly impacts the quality of an embedding. As a result, selecting the best embedding is a challenging task and very often requires domain experts. In this paper, we propose a ``divergence score&#39;&#39; that can be assign to various embeddings to distinguish good ones from bad ones. This general framework provides a tool for an unsupervised graph embedding comparison. In order to achieve it, we needed to generalize the well-known Chung-Lu model to incorporate geometry which is interesting on its own rights. In order to test our framework, we did a number of experiments with synthetic networks as well as real-world networks, and various embedding algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

Clustering via Hypergraph Modularity

Despite the fact that many important problems (including clustering) can be described using hypergraphs, theoretical foundations as well as practical algorithms using hypergraphs are not well developed yet. In this paper, we propose a hypergraph modularity function that generalizes its well established and widely used graph counterpart measure of how clustered a network is. In order to define it properly, we generalize the Chung-Lu model for graphs to hypergraphs. We then provide the theoretical foundations to search for an optimal solution with respect to our hypergraph modularity function. Two simple heuristic algorithms are described and applied to a few small illustrative examples. We show that using a strict version of our proposed modularity function often leads to a solution where a smaller number of hyperedges get cut as compared to optimizing modularity of 2-section graph of a hypergraph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access