Paper detail

Game Brush Number

We study a two-person game based on the well-studied brushing process on graphs. Players Min and Max alternately place brushes on the vertices of a graph. When a vertex accumulates at least as many brushes as its degree, it sends one brush to each neighbor and is removed from the graph; this may in turn induce the removal of other vertices. The game ends once all vertices have been removed. Min seeks to minimize the number of brushes played during the game, while Max seeks to maximize it. When both players play optimally, the length of the game is the game brush number of the graph $G$, denoted $b_g(G)$. By considering strategies for both players and modelling the evolution of the game with differential equations, we provide an asymptotic value for the game brush number of the complete graph; namely, we show that $b_g(K_n) = (1+o(1))n^2/e$. Using a fractional version of the game, we couple the game brush numbers of complete graphs and the binomial random graph $\mathcal{G}(n,p)$. It is shown that for $pn \gg \ln n$ asymptotically almost surely $b_g(\mathcal{G}(n,p)) = (1 + o(1))p b_g(K_n) = (1 + o(1))pn^2/e$. Finally, we study the relationship between the game brush number and the (original) brush number.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.