Paper detail

The acquaintance time of (percolated) random geometric graphs

In this paper, we study the acquaintance time $\AC(G)$ defined for a connected graph $G$. We focus on $\G(n,r,p)$, a random subgraph of a random geometric graph in which $n$ vertices are chosen uniformly at random and independently from $[0,1]^2$, and two vertices are adjacent with probability $p$ if the Euclidean distance between them is at most $r$. We present asymptotic results for the acquaintance time of $\G(n,r,p)$ for a wide range of $p=p(n)$ and $r=r(n)$. In particular, we show that with high probability $\AC(G) = Θ(r^{-2})$ for $G \in \G(n,r,1)$, the &#34;ordinary&#34; random geometric graph, provided that $πn r^2 - \ln n \to \infty$ (that is, above the connectivity threshold). For the percolated random geometric graph $G \in \G(n,r,p)$, we show that with high probability $\AC(G) = Θ(r^{-2} p^{-1} \ln n)$, provided that $p n r^2 \geq n^{1/2+\eps}$ and $p < 1-\eps$ for some $\eps>0$.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.