Study of the wave packet treatment of neutrino oscillation at Daya Bay

preprint2016arXivOpen access
F. P. AnA. B. BalantekinH. R. BandM. BishaiS. BlythD. CaoG. F. CaoJ. CaoW. R. CenY. L. ChanJ. F. ChangL. C. ChangY. ChangH. S. ChenQ. Y. ChenS. M. ChenY. X. ChenY. ChenJ. -H. ChengJ. ChengY. P. ChengZ. K. ChengJ. J. CherwinkaM. C. ChuA. ChukanovJ. P. CummingsJ. de ArcosZ. Y. DengX. F. DingY. Y. DingM. V. DiwanM. DolgarevaJ. DoveD. A. DwyerW. R. EdwardsR. GillM. GoncharG. H. GongH. GongM. GrassiW. Q. GuM. Y. GuanL. GuoX. H. GuoZ. GuoR. W. HackenburgR. HanS. HansM. HeK. M. HeegerY. K. HengA. HigueraY. K. HorY. B. HsiungB. Z. HuT. HuW. HuE. C. HuangH. X. HuangX. T. HuangP. HuberW. HuoG. HussainD. E. JaffeP. JaffkeK. L. JenS. JetterX. P. JiX. L. JiJ. B. JiaoR. A. JohnsonJ. JoshiL. KangS. H. KettellS. KohnM. KramerK. K. KwanM. W. KwokT. KwokT. J. LangfordK. LauL. LebanowskiJ. LeeJ. H. C. LeeR. T. LeiR. LeitnerJ. K. C. LeungC. LiD. J. LiF. LiG. S. LiQ. J. LiS. LiS. C. LiW. D. LiX. N. LiY. F. LiZ. B. LiH. LiangC. J. LinG. L. LinS. LinS. K. LinY. -C. LinJ. J. LingJ. M. LinkL. LittenbergB. R. LittlejohnD. W. LiuJ. L. LiuJ. C. LiuC. W. LohC. LuH. Q. LuJ. S. LuK. B. LukZ. LvQ. M. MaX. Y. MaX. B. MaY. Q. MaY. MalyshkinD. A. Martinez CaicedoR. D. McKeownI. MitchellM. MooneyY. NakajimaJ. NapolitanoD. NaumovE. NaumovaH. Y. NgaiZ. NingJ. P. Ochoa-RicouxA. OlshevskiyH. -R. PanJ. ParkS. PattonV. PecJ. C. PengL. PinskyC. S. J. PunF. Z. QiM. QiX. QianN. RaperJ. RenR. RoseroB. RoskovecX. C. RuanH. SteinerG. X. SunJ. L. SunW. TangD. TaychenachevK. TreskovK. V. TsangC. E. TullN. ViauxB. VirenV. VorobelC. H. WangM. WangN. Y. WangR. G. WangW. WangX. WangY. F. WangZ. WangZ. M. WangH. Y. WeiL. J. WenK. WhisnantC. G. WhiteL. WhiteheadT. WiseH. L. H. WongS. C. F. WongE. WorcesterC. -H. WuQ. WuW. J. WuD. M. XiaJ. K. XiaZ. Z. XingJ. Y. XuJ. L. XuY. XuT. XueC. G. YangH. YangL. YangM. S. YangM. T. YangM. YeZ. YeM. YehB. L. YoungZ. Y. YuS. ZengL. ZhanC. ZhangH. H. ZhangJ. W. ZhangQ. M. ZhangX. T. ZhangY. M. ZhangY. X. ZhangZ. J. ZhangZ. Y. ZhangZ. P. ZhangJ. ZhaoQ. W. ZhaoY. B. ZhaoW. L. ZhongL. ZhouN. ZhouH. L. ZhuangJ. H. Zou

Abstract

The disappearance of reactor νˉe\barν_e observed by the Daya Bay experiment is examined in the framework of a model in which the neutrino is described by a wave packet with a relative intrinsic momentum dispersion σrelσ_\text{rel}. Three pairs of nuclear reactors and eight antineutrino detectors, each with good energy resolution, distributed among three experimental halls, supply a high-statistics sample of νˉe\barν_e acquired at nine different baselines. This provides a unique platform to test the effects which arise from the wave packet treatment of neutrino oscillation. The modified survival probability formula was used to fit Daya Bay data, providing the first experimental limits: 2.38⋅10−17<σrel<0.232.38 \cdot 10^{-17} < σ_{\rm rel} < 0.23. Treating the dimensions of the reactor cores and detectors as constraints, the limits are improved: 10−14≲σrel<0.2310^{-14} \lesssim σ_{\rm rel} < 0.23, and an upper limit of σrel<0.20σ_{\rm rel} <0.20 is obtained. All limits correspond to a 95\% C.L. Furthermore, the effect due to the wave packet nature of neutrino oscillation is found to be insignificant for reactor antineutrinos detected by the Daya Bay experiment thus ensuring an unbiased measurement of the oscillation parameters sin⁡22θ13\sin^22θ_{13} and Δm322Δm^2_{32} within the plane wave model.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.