Paper detail

Study of B^0 -> rho^0 rho^0 decays, implications for the CKM angle phi_2 and search for other B^0 decay modes with a four-pion final state

We present a study of the branching fraction of the decay B^0->rho0rho0 and the fraction of longitudinally polarized rho0 mesons in this decay. The results are obtained from the final data sample containing 772 million BBbar pairs collected at the Y(4S) resonance with the Belle detector at the KEKB asymmetric-energy e+e- collider. We find 166 +- 59 B^0 -> rho0 rho0 events (including systematic uncertainties), corresponding to a branching fraction of B(B^0->rho0rho0) = (1.02 +- 0.30 (stat) +- 0.15 (syst)) x 10^{-6} with a significance of 3.4 standard deviations and a longitudinal polarization fraction fL = 0.21^{+0.18}_{-0.22} (stat) +- 0.15 (syst). We use the longitudinal polarization fraction to determine the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix angle phi_2 = (84.9 +- 13.5) degrees through an isospin analysis in the B->rhorho system. We furthermore find 149 +- 49 B^0->f0rho0 events, corresponding to B(B^0->f0rho0) x B(f0->pi+pi-) = (0.78 +- 0.22 (stat) +- 0.11 (syst)) x 10^{-6}, with a significance of 3.1 standard deviations. We find no other significant contribution with the same final state, and set upper limits at 90% confidence level on the (product) branching fractions, B(B^0->pi+pi-pi+pi-)<11.2 x 10^{-6}, B(B^0->rho0pi+pi-)<12.0 x 10^{-6}, B(B^0->f0pi+pi-) x B(f0->pi+pi-) <3.0 x 10^{-6} and B(B^0->f0f0) x B(f0->pi+pi-)^{2} < 0.2 x 10^{-6}.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
The Belle CollaborationP. VanhoeferJ. DalsenoC. KieslingI. AdachiH. AiharaD. M. AsnerV. AulchenkoT. AushevA. M. BakichA. BalaV. BhardwajB. BhuyanG. BonviciniA. BozekM. BraçkoT. E. BrowderM. -C. ChangP. ChangV. ChekelianA. ChenP. ChenB. G. CheonK. ChilikinR. ChistovK. ChoV. ChobanovaY. ChoiD. CinabroZ. DoleczalZ. DraśalS. EidelmanH. FarhatJ. E. FastT. FerberV. GaurN. GabyshevS. GangulyA. GarmashR. GillardY. M. GohB. GolobT. HaraK. HayasakaH. HayashiiT. HiguchiY. HoriiY. HoshiW. -S. HouH. J. HyunT. IijimaA. IshikawaR. ItohY. IwasakiT. IwashitaI. JaegleT. JuliusD. H. KahE. KatoH. KawaiT. KawasakiD. Y. KimH. O. KimJ. B. KimJ. H. KimM. J. KimY. J. KimK. KinoshitaJ. KlucarB. R. KoS. KorparP. KriczanP. KrokovnyB. KronenbitterT. KuhrT. KumitaA. KuzminY. -J. KwonJ. S. LangeS. -H. LeeJ. LiL. Li GioiJ. LibbyC. LiuY. LiuD. LiventsevP. LukinK. MiyabayashiH. MiyataR. MizukG. B. MohantyA. MollH. -G. MoserR. MussaE. NakanoM. NakaoZ. NatkaniecE. NedelkovskaN. K. NisarS. NishidaO. NitohS. OgawaP. PakhlovG. PakhlovaC. W. ParkH. ParkH. K. ParkT. K. PedlarR. PestotnikM. PetriçL. E. PiilonenM. RitterM. RöhrkenA. RostomyanS. RyuH. SahooT. SaitoY. SakaiS. SandilyaL. SanteljT. SanukiY. SatoV. SavinovO. SchneiderG. SchnellC. SchwandaA. J. SchwartzD. SemmlerK. SenyoO. SeonM. E. SeviorM. ShapkinC. P. ShenT. -A. ShibataJ. -G. ShiuB. ShwartzA. SibidanovF. SimonY. -S. SohnA. SokolovE. SolovievaM. StariçM. StederT. SumiyoshiU. TamponiG. TatishviliY. TeramotoK. TrabelsiT. TsuboyamaM. UchidaS. UeharaY. UnnoS. UnoS. E. VahsenC. Van HulseG. VarnerK. E. VarvellA. VinokurovaV. VorobyevM. N. WagnerC. H. WangM. -Z. WangP. WangX. L. WangY. WatanabeK. M. WilliamsE. WonY. YamashitaS. YashchenkoY. YookZ. P. ZhangV. ZhilichV. ZhulanovA. Zupanc

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access174 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

The Belle CollaborationP. VanhoeferJ. DalsenoC. KieslingI. AdachiH. AiharaD. M. AsnerV. AulchenkoT. AushevA. M. BakichA. BalaV. BhardwajB. BhuyanG. BonviciniA. BozekM. BraçkoT. E. BrowderM. -C. ChangP. ChangV. ChekelianA. ChenP. ChenB. G. CheonK. ChilikinR. ChistovK. ChoV. ChobanovaY. ChoiD. CinabroZ. DoleczalZ. DraśalS. EidelmanH. FarhatJ. E. FastT. FerberV. GaurN. GabyshevS. GangulyA. GarmashR. GillardY. M. GohB. GolobT. HaraK. HayasakaH. HayashiiT. HiguchiY. HoriiY. HoshiW. -S. HouH. J. HyunT. IijimaA. IshikawaR. ItohY. IwasakiT. IwashitaI. JaegleT. JuliusD. H. KahE. KatoH. KawaiT. KawasakiD. Y. KimH. O. KimJ. B. KimJ. H. KimM. J. KimY. J. KimK. KinoshitaJ. KlucarB. R. KoS. KorparP. KriczanP. KrokovnyB. KronenbitterT. KuhrT. KumitaA. KuzminY. -J. KwonJ. S. LangeS. -H. LeeJ. LiL. Li GioiJ. LibbyC. LiuY. LiuD. LiventsevP. LukinK. MiyabayashiH. MiyataR. MizukG. B. MohantyA. MollH. -G. MoserR. MussaE. NakanoM. NakaoZ. NatkaniecE. NedelkovskaN. K. NisarS. NishidaO. NitohS. OgawaP. PakhlovG. PakhlovaC. W. ParkH. ParkH. K. ParkT. K. PedlarR. PestotnikM. PetriçL. E. PiilonenM. RitterM. RöhrkenA. RostomyanS. RyuH. SahooT. SaitoY. SakaiS. SandilyaL. SanteljT. SanukiY. SatoV. SavinovO. SchneiderG. SchnellC. SchwandaA. J. SchwartzD. SemmlerK. SenyoO. SeonM. E. SeviorM. ShapkinC. P. ShenT. -A. ShibataJ. -G. ShiuB. ShwartzA. SibidanovF. SimonY. -S. SohnA. SokolovE. SolovievaM. StariçM. StederT. SumiyoshiU. TamponiG. TatishviliY. TeramotoK. TrabelsiT. TsuboyamaM. UchidaS. UeharaY. UnnoS. UnoS. E. VahsenC. Van HulseG. VarnerK. E. VarvellA. VinokurovaV. VorobyevM. N. WagnerC. H. WangM. -Z. WangP. WangX. L. WangY. WatanabeK. M. WilliamsE. WonY. YamashitaS. YashchenkoY. YookZ. P. ZhangV. ZhilichV. ZhulanovA. Zupanc

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.