Paper detail

Influence of α-particles irradiation on the performance and defect levels structure of Al/SiO2/p-type Si surface barrier detector

Deterioration of the operation parameters of Al/SiO2/p-type Si surface barrier detector upon irradiation with alpha-particles at room temperature was investigated. As a result of 40-days irradiation with a total fluence of 8*10^9 α-particles, an increase of α-peak FWHM from 70 keV to 100 keV was observed and explained by increase of the detector reverse current due to formation of a high concentration of near mid-gap defect levels. Performed CV measurements revealed the appearance of at least 6*10^12 cm-3 radiation-induced acceptors at the depths where according to the TRIM simulations the highest concentration of vacancy-interstitial pairs was created by the incoming α-particles. The studies carried out by current-DLTS technique allowed to associate the observed increase of the acceptor concentration with the near mid-gap acceptor level at EV+0.56 eV. This level can be apparently associated with V2O defects recognized previously to be responsible for the space charge sign inversion in the irradiated n-type Si detectors.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.