Paper detail

First search for the $η_{c2}(1D)$ in $B$ decays at Belle

The first dedicated search for the $η_{c2}(1D)$ is carried out using the decays $B^+ \rightarrow η_{c2}(1D) K^+$, $B^0 \rightarrow η_{c2}(1D) K^0_S$, $B^0 \rightarrow η_{c2}(1D) π^- K^+$, and $B^+ \rightarrow η_{c2}(1D) π^+ K^0_S$ with $η_{c2}(1D) \to h_c γ$. No significant signal is found. For the $η_{c2}(1D)$ mass range between $3795$ and $3845\ \mathrm{MeV}/c^2$, the branching-fraction upper limits are determined to be $\mathcal{B}(B^+ \rightarrow η_{c2}(1D) K^+) \times \mathcal{B}(η_{c2}(1D) \to h_c γ) < 3.7 \times 10^{-5}$, $\mathcal{B}(B^0 \rightarrow η_{c2}(1D) K^0_S) \times \mathcal{B}(η_{c2}(1D) \to h_c γ) < 3.5 \times 10^{-5}$, $\mathcal{B}(B^0 \rightarrow η_{c2}(1D) π^- K^+) \times \mathcal{B}(η_{c2}(1D) \to h_c γ) < 1.0 \times 10^{-4}$, and $\mathcal{B}(B^+ \rightarrow η_{c2}(1D) π^+ K^0_S) \times \mathcal{B}(η_{c2}(1D) \to h_c γ) < 1.1 \times 10^{-4}$ at 90% C. L. The analysis is based on the 711 $\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ data sample collected on the $Υ(4S)$ resonance by the Belle detector, which operated at the KEKB asymmetric-energy $e^+ e^-$ collider.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
Belle CollaborationK. ChilikinI. AdachiH. AiharaS. Al SaidD. M. AsnerV. AulchenkoT. AushevR. AyadV. BabuS. BahinipatiP. BeheraC. BeleñoK. BelousJ. BennettV. BhardwajT. BilkaJ. BiswalG. BonviciniA. BozekM. BračkoT. E. BrowderM. CampajolaL. CaoD. ČervenkovM. -C. ChangV. ChekelianA. ChenB. G. CheonK. ChoS. -K. ChoiY. ChoiS. ChoudhuryD. CinabroS. CunliffeN. DashG. De NardoF. Di CapuaZ. DoležalT. V. DongS. EidelmanD. EpifanovJ. E. FastT. FerberD. FerlewiczB. G. FulsomR. GargV. GaurN. GabyshevA. GarmashA. GiriP. GoldenzweigB. GolobO. GrzymkowskaO. HartbrichK. HayasakaH. HayashiiM. Hernandez VillanuevaW. -S. HouC. -L. HsuK. InamiG. IngugliaA. IshikawaR. ItohM. IwasakiY. IwasakiW. W. JacobsE. -J. JangS. JiaY. JinK. K. JooA. B. KaliyarG. KaryanY. KatoT. KawasakiC. KieslingC. H. KimD. Y. KimK. -H. KimS. H. KimY. -K. KimT. D. KimmelK. KinoshitaP. KodyšS. KorparP. KrižanR. KroegerP. KrokovnyT. KuhrR. KulasiriR. KumarA. KuzminY. -J. KwonK. LalwaniJ. S. LangeI. S. LeeS. C. LeeL. K. LiY. B. LiL. Li GioiJ. LibbyK. LieretD. LiventsevC. MacQueenM. MasudaT. MatsudaD. MatvienkoM. MerolaK. MiyabayashiR. MizukG. B. MohantyT. J. MoonT. MoriM. MrvarR. MussaM. NakaoZ. NatkaniecM. NayakN. K. NisarS. NishidaK. NishimuraK. OgawaS. OgawaH. OnoY. OnukiP. OskinP. PakhlovG. PakhlovaS. PardiH. ParkS. -H. ParkS. PatraS. PaulT. K. PedlarR. PestotnikL. E. PiilonenT. PodobnikV. PopovE. PrencipeM. T. PrimM. RitterM. RöhrkenA. RostomyanN. RoutG. RussoY. SakaiA. SangalL. SanteljT. SanukiV. SavinovG. SchnellJ. SchuelerC. SchwandaY. SeinoK. SenyoM. ShapkinJ. -G. ShiuB. ShwartzA. SokolovE. SolovievaM. StaričZ. S. StottlerK. SumisawaT. SumiyoshiW. SutcliffeM. TakizawaK. TanidaF. TenchiniK. TrabelsiM. UchidaS. UeharaT. UglovY. UnnoS. UnoP. UrquijoY. UsovG. VarnerA. VinokurovaV. VorobyevC. H. WangE. WangM. -Z. WangP. WangM. WatanabeS. WatanukiE. WonX. XuW. YanS. B. YangH. YeJ. H. YinC. Z. YuanJ. ZhangZ. P. ZhangV. ZhilichV. ZhukovaV. Zhulanov
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Belle CollaborationK. ChilikinI. AdachiH. AiharaS. Al SaidD. M. AsnerV. AulchenkoT. AushevR. AyadV. BabuS. BahinipatiP. BeheraC. BeleñoK. BelousJ. BennettV. BhardwajT. BilkaJ. BiswalG. BonviciniA. BozekM. BračkoT. E. BrowderM. CampajolaL. CaoD. ČervenkovM. -C. ChangV. ChekelianA. ChenB. G. CheonK. ChoS. -K. ChoiY. ChoiS. ChoudhuryD. CinabroS. CunliffeN. DashG. De NardoF. Di CapuaZ. DoležalT. V. DongS. EidelmanD. EpifanovJ. E. FastT. FerberD. FerlewiczB. G. FulsomR. GargV. GaurN. GabyshevA. GarmashA. GiriP. GoldenzweigB. GolobO. GrzymkowskaO. HartbrichK. HayasakaH. HayashiiM. Hernandez VillanuevaW. -S. HouC. -L. HsuK. InamiG. IngugliaA. IshikawaR. ItohM. IwasakiY. IwasakiW. W. JacobsE. -J. JangS. JiaY. JinK. K. JooA. B. KaliyarG. KaryanY. KatoT. KawasakiC. KieslingC. H. KimD. Y. KimK. -H. KimS. H. KimY. -K. KimT. D. KimmelK. KinoshitaP. KodyšS. KorparP. KrižanR. KroegerP. KrokovnyT. KuhrR. KulasiriR. KumarA. KuzminY. -J. KwonK. LalwaniJ. S. LangeI. S. LeeS. C. LeeL. K. LiY. B. LiL. Li GioiJ. LibbyK. LieretD. LiventsevC. MacQueenM. MasudaT. MatsudaD. MatvienkoM. MerolaK. MiyabayashiR. MizukG. B. MohantyT. J. MoonT. MoriM. MrvarR. MussaM. NakaoZ. NatkaniecM. NayakN. K. NisarS. NishidaK. NishimuraK. OgawaS. OgawaH. OnoY. OnukiP. OskinP. PakhlovG. PakhlovaS. PardiH. ParkS. -H. ParkS. PatraS. PaulT. K. PedlarR. PestotnikL. E. PiilonenT. PodobnikV. PopovE. PrencipeM. T. PrimM. RitterM. RöhrkenA. RostomyanN. RoutG. RussoY. SakaiA. SangalL. SanteljT. SanukiV. SavinovG. SchnellJ. SchuelerC. SchwandaY. SeinoK. SenyoM. ShapkinJ. -G. ShiuB. ShwartzA. SokolovE. SolovievaM. StaričZ. S. StottlerK. SumisawaT. SumiyoshiW. SutcliffeM. TakizawaK. TanidaF. TenchiniK. TrabelsiM. UchidaS. UeharaT. UglovY. UnnoS. UnoP. UrquijoY. UsovG. VarnerA. VinokurovaV. VorobyevC. H. WangE. WangM. -Z. WangP. WangM. WatanabeS. WatanukiE. WonX. XuW. YanS. B. YangH. YeJ. H. YinC. Z. YuanJ. ZhangZ. P. ZhangV. ZhilichV. ZhukovaV. Zhulanov

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.