Paper detail

First Measurement of the $Λ_c^+ \to p η'$ decay

We present the first measurement of the branching fraction of the singly Cabibbo-suppressed (SCS) decay $Λ_c^+ \to p η'$ with $η' \to ηπ^+π^-$, using a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 981 $\rm fb^{-1}$, collected by the Belle detector at the KEKB $e^{+}$$e^{-}$ asymmetric-energy collider. A significant $Λ_c^+$ signal is observed for the first time with a signal significance of 5.4$σ$. The relative branching fraction with respect to the normalization mode $Λ_c^+ \to pK^-π^+$ is measured to be \begin{equation*} \frac{{\cal B}(Λ_c^+ \to p η')}{{\cal B}(Λ_c^+ \to p K^-π^+)} = (7.54 \pm 1.32 \pm 0.75) \times 10^{-3}, \end{equation*} where the uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively. Using the world-average value of ${\cal B}(Λ_c^+ \to p K^-π^+) = (6.28\pm0.32)\times10^{-2}$, we obtain \begin{equation*} {\cal B}(Λ_c^+ \to p η') = (4.73 \pm 0.82 \pm 0.47 \pm 0.24)\times 10^{-4}, \end{equation*} where the uncertainties are statistical, systematic, and from ${\cal B}(Λ_c^+ \to pK^-π^+)$, respectively.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
Belle CollaborationS. X. LiJ. X. CuiC. P. ShenI. AdachiH. AiharaS. Al SaidD. M. AsnerH. AtmacanT. AushevR. AyadV. BabuP. BeheraK. BelousM. BessnerV. BhardwajB. BhuyanT. BilkaD. BodrovG. BonviciniJ. BorahA. BozekM. BrackoP. BranchiniT. E. BrowderA. BudanoM. CampajolaD. CervenkovM. -C. ChangP. ChangV. ChekelianA. ChenB. G. CheonK. ChilikinH. E. ChoK. ChoS. -J. ChoS. -K. ChoiY. ChoiS. ChoudhuryD. CinabroS. CunliffeS. DasN. DashG. De NardoG. De PietroR. DhamijaF. Di CapuaZ. DolezalT. V. DongD. EpifanovT. FerberD. FerlewiczB. G. FulsomR. GargV. GaurN. GabyshevA. GiriP. GoldenzweigB. GolobE. GrazianiT. GuT. HaraK. HayasakaH. HayashiiW. -S. HouK. InamiA. IshikawaM. IwasakiY. IwasakiW. W. JacobsE. -J. JangS. JiaY. JinK. K. JooJ. KahnA. B. KaliyarK. H. KangY. KatoT. KawasakiH. KichimiC. KieslingC. H. KimD. Y. KimY. -K. KimK. KinoshitaP. KodysT. KonnoA. KorobovS. KorparE. KovalenkoP. KrizanR. KroegerP. KrokovnyM. KumarR. KumarK. KumaraY. -J. KwonT. LamM. LaurenzaS. C. LeeJ. LiL. K. LiY. LiL. Li GioiJ. LibbyD. LiventsevA. MartiniM. MasudaT. MatsudaD. MatvienkoS. K. MauryaF. MeierM. MerolaK. MiyabayashiR. MizukR. MussaM. NakaoD. NarwalZ. NatkaniecA. NatochiiL. NayakN. K. NisarS. NishidaK. NishimuraK. OgawaS. OgawaH. OnoP. OskinP. PakhlovG. PakhlovaT. PangS. PardiS. -H. ParkS. PatraT. K. PedlarR. PestotnikL. E. PiilonenT. PodobnikV. PopovM. T. PrimM. RohrkenA. RostomyanN. RoutG. RussoD. SahooS. SandilyaA. SangalT. SanukiV. SavinovG. SchnellJ. SchuelerC. SchwandaA. J. SchwartzY. SeinoK. SenyoM. E. SeviorM. ShapkinC. SharmaV. ShebalinJ. -G. ShiuB. ShwartzF. SimonE. SolovievaS. StanicM. StaricZ. S. StottlerM. SumihamaK. SumisawaT. SumiyoshiW. SutcliffeM. TakizawaU. TamponiK. TanidaF. TenchiniK. TrabelsiM. UchidaY. UnnoK. UnoS. UnoP. UrquijoS. E. VahsenR. van TonderG. VarnerA. VinokurovaE. WaheedD. WangE. WangM. -Z. WangS. WatanukiE. WonX. XuB. D. YabsleyW. YanH. YeJ. H. YinY. YusaY. ZhaiV. ZhilichV. Zhukova
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Belle CollaborationS. X. LiJ. X. CuiC. P. ShenI. AdachiH. AiharaS. Al SaidD. M. AsnerH. AtmacanT. AushevR. AyadV. BabuP. BeheraK. BelousM. BessnerV. BhardwajB. BhuyanT. BilkaD. BodrovG. BonviciniJ. BorahA. BozekM. BrackoP. BranchiniT. E. BrowderA. BudanoM. CampajolaD. CervenkovM. -C. ChangP. ChangV. ChekelianA. ChenB. G. CheonK. ChilikinH. E. ChoK. ChoS. -J. ChoS. -K. ChoiY. ChoiS. ChoudhuryD. CinabroS. CunliffeS. DasN. DashG. De NardoG. De PietroR. DhamijaF. Di CapuaZ. DolezalT. V. DongD. EpifanovT. FerberD. FerlewiczB. G. FulsomR. GargV. GaurN. GabyshevA. GiriP. GoldenzweigB. GolobE. GrazianiT. GuT. HaraK. HayasakaH. HayashiiW. -S. HouK. InamiA. IshikawaM. IwasakiY. IwasakiW. W. JacobsE. -J. JangS. JiaY. JinK. K. JooJ. KahnA. B. KaliyarK. H. KangY. KatoT. KawasakiH. KichimiC. KieslingC. H. KimD. Y. KimY. -K. KimK. KinoshitaP. KodysT. KonnoA. KorobovS. KorparE. KovalenkoP. KrizanR. KroegerP. KrokovnyM. KumarR. KumarK. KumaraY. -J. KwonT. LamM. LaurenzaS. C. LeeJ. LiL. K. LiY. LiL. Li GioiJ. LibbyD. LiventsevA. MartiniM. MasudaT. MatsudaD. MatvienkoS. K. MauryaF. MeierM. MerolaK. MiyabayashiR. MizukR. MussaM. NakaoD. NarwalZ. NatkaniecA. NatochiiL. NayakN. K. NisarS. NishidaK. NishimuraK. OgawaS. OgawaH. OnoP. OskinP. PakhlovG. PakhlovaT. PangS. PardiS. -H. ParkS. PatraT. K. PedlarR. PestotnikL. E. PiilonenT. PodobnikV. PopovM. T. PrimM. RohrkenA. RostomyanN. RoutG. RussoD. SahooS. SandilyaA. SangalT. SanukiV. SavinovG. SchnellJ. SchuelerC. SchwandaA. J. SchwartzY. SeinoK. SenyoM. E. SeviorM. ShapkinC. SharmaV. ShebalinJ. -G. ShiuB. ShwartzF. SimonE. SolovievaS. StanicM. StaricZ. S. StottlerM. SumihamaK. SumisawaT. SumiyoshiW. SutcliffeM. TakizawaU. TamponiK. TanidaF. TenchiniK. TrabelsiM. UchidaY. UnnoK. UnoS. UnoP. UrquijoS. E. VahsenR. van TonderG. VarnerA. VinokurovaE. WaheedD. WangE. WangM. -Z. WangS. WatanukiE. WonX. XuB. D. YabsleyW. YanH. YeJ. H. YinY. YusaY. ZhaiV. ZhilichV. Zhukova

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.