BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Paper detail

130Te Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay with CUORICINO

We report the final result of the CUORICINO experiment. Operated between 2003 and 2008, with a total exposure of 19.75 kg y of 130Te, CUORICINO was able to set a lower bound on the 130Te 0nDBD half-life of 2.8 10^{24} years at 90% C.L. The limit here reported includes the effects of systematic uncertainties that are examined in detail in the paper. The corresponding upper bound on the neutrino Majorana mass is in the range 300--710 meV, depending on the adopted nuclear matrix element evaluation.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
E. AndreottiC. ArnaboldiF. T. Avignone IIIM. BalataI. BandacM. BarucciJ. W. BeemanF. BelliniC. BrofferioA. BryantC. BucciL. CanonicaS. CapelliL. CarboneM. CarrettoniM. ClemenzaO. CremonesiR. J. CreswickS. Di DomizioM. J. DolinskiL. EjzakR. FacciniH. A. FarachE. FerriE. FioriniL. FoggettaA. GiacheroL. GironiA. GiulianiP. GorlaE. GuardincerriT. D. GutierrezE. E. HallerK. KazkazS. KraftL. KoglerC. MaianoR. H. MaruyamaC. MartinezM. MartinezS. NewmanS. NisiC. NonesE. B. NormanA. NucciottiF. OrioM. PallaviciniV. PalmieriL. PattavinaM. PavanM. PedrettiG. PessinaS. PirroE. PrevitaliL. RisegariC. RosenfeldC. RusconiC. SalvioniS. SangiorgioD. SchaefferN. D. ScielzoM. SistiA. R. SmithC. TomeiG. VenturaM. Vignati
nucl-ex
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Like0Dislike0Score 0

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Save to reading list0
Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

E. AndreottiC. ArnaboldiF. T. Avignone IIIM. BalataI. BandacM. BarucciJ. W. BeemanF. BelliniC. BrofferioA. BryantC. BucciL. CanonicaS. CapelliL. CarboneM. CarrettoniM. ClemenzaO. CremonesiR. J. CreswickS. Di DomizioM. J. DolinskiL. EjzakR. FacciniH. A. FarachE. FerriE. FioriniL. FoggettaA. GiacheroL. GironiA. GiulianiP. GorlaE. GuardincerriT. D. GutierrezE. E. HallerK. KazkazS. KraftL. KoglerC. MaianoR. H. MaruyamaC. MartinezM. MartinezS. NewmanS. NisiC. NonesE. B. NormanA. NucciottiF. OrioM. PallaviciniV. PalmieriL. PattavinaM. PavanM. PedrettiG. PessinaS. PirroE. PrevitaliL. RisegariC. RosenfeldC. RusconiC. SalvioniS. SangiorgioD. SchaefferN. D. ScielzoM. SistiA. R. SmithC. TomeiG. VenturaM. Vignati

Institutions

No institution affiliation has been imported for this paper yet.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form
Log in to review

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form
Log in to comment

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.