Researcher profile

Deeparnab Chakrabarty

Deeparnab Chakrabarty contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Counting hypertriangles through hypergraph orientations

Counting the number of small patterns is a central task in network analysis. While this problem is well studied for graphs, many real-world datasets are naturally modeled as hypergraphs, motivating the need for efficient hypergraph motif counting algorithms. In particular, we study the problem of counting hypertriangles - collections of three pairwise-intersecting hyperedges. These hypergraph patterns have a rich structure with multiple distinct intersection patterns unlike graph triangles. Inspired by classical graph algorithms based on orientations and degeneracy, we develop a theoretical framework that generalizes these concepts to hypergraphs and yields provable algorithms for hypertriangle counting. We implement these ideas in DITCH (Degeneracy Inspired Triangle Counter for Hypergraphs) and show experimentally that it is 10-100x faster and more memory efficient than existing state-of-the-art methods.

preprint2022arXiv

Approximation Algorithms for Continuous Clustering and Facility Location Problems

We consider the approximability of center-based clustering problems where the points to be clustered lie in a metric space, and no candidate centers are specified. We call such problems &#34;continuous&#34;, to distinguish from &#34;discrete&#34; clustering where candidate centers are specified. For many objectives, one can reduce the continuous case to the discrete case, and use an $α$-approximation algorithm for the discrete case to get a $βα$-approximation for the continuous case, where $β$ depends on the objective: e.g. for $k$-median, $β= 2$, and for $k$-means, $β= 4$. Our motivating question is whether this gap of $β$ is inherent, or are there better algorithms for continuous clustering than simply reducing to the discrete case? In a recent SODA 2021 paper, Cohen-Addad, Karthik, and Lee prove a factor-$2$ and a factor-$4$ hardness, respectively, for continuous $k$-median and $k$-means, even when the number of centers $k$ is a constant. The discrete case for a constant $k$ is exactly solvable in polytime, so the $β$ loss seems unavoidable in some regimes. In this paper, we approach continuous clustering via the round-or-cut framework. For four continuous clustering problems, we outperform the reduction to the discrete case. Notably, for the problem $λ$-UFL, where $β= 2$ and the discrete case has a hardness of $1.27$, we obtain an approximation ratio of $2.32 < 2 \times 1.27$ for the continuous case. Also, for continuous $k$-means, where the best known approximation ratio for the discrete case is $9$, we obtain an approximation ratio of $32 < 4 \times 9$. The key challenge is that most algorithms for discrete clustering, including the state of the art, depend on linear programs that become infinite-sized in the continuous case. To overcome this, we design new linear programs for the continuous case which are amenable to the round-or-cut framework.

preprint2022arXiv

Improved Lower Bounds for Submodular Function Minimization

We provide a generic technique for constructing families of submodular functions to obtain lower bounds for submodular function minimization (SFM). Applying this technique, we prove that any deterministic SFM algorithm on a ground set of $n$ elements requires at least $Ω(n \log n)$ queries to an evaluation oracle. This is the first super-linear query complexity lower bound for SFM and improves upon the previous best lower bound of $2n$ given by [Graur et al., ITCS 2020]. Using our construction, we also prove that any (possibly randomized) parallel SFM algorithm, which can make up to $\mathsf{poly}(n)$ queries per round, requires at least $Ω(n / \log n)$ rounds to minimize a submodular function. This improves upon the previous best lower bound of $\tildeΩ(n^{1/3})$ rounds due to [Chakrabarty et al., FOCS 2021], and settles the parallel complexity of query-efficient SFM up to logarithmic factors due to a recent advance in [Jiang, SODA 2021].

preprint2021arXiv

Robust $k$-Center with Two Types of Radii

In the non-uniform $k$-center problem, the objective is to cover points in a metric space with specified number of balls of different radii. Chakrabarty, Goyal, and Krishnaswamy [ICALP 2016, Trans. on Algs. 2020] (CGK, henceforth) give a constant factor approximation when there are two types of radii. In this paper, we give a constant factor approximation for the two radii case in the presence of outliers. To achieve this, we need to bypass the technical barrier of bad integrality gaps in the CGK approach. We do so using &#34;the ellipsoid method inside the ellipsoid method&#34;: use an outer layer of the ellipsoid method to reduce to stylized instances and use an inner layer of the ellipsoid method to solve these specialized instances. This idea is of independent interest and could be applicable to other problems. Keywords: Approximation, Clustering, Outliers, and Round-or-Cut.

preprint2010arXiv

$G$-Parking Functions, Acyclic Orientations and Spanning Trees

Given an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$, and a designated vertex $q\in V$, the notion of a $G$-parking function (with respect to $q$) was independently developed and studied by various authors, and has recently gained renewed attention. This notion generalizes the classical notion of a parking function associated with the complete graph. In this work, we study properties of {\em maximum} $G$-parking functions and provide a new bijection between them and the set of spanning trees of $G$ with no broken circuit. As a case study, we specialize some of our results to the graph corresponding to the discrete $n$-cube $Q_n$. We present the article in an expository self-contained form, since we found the combinatorial aspects of $G$-parking functions somewhat scattered in the literature, typically treated in conjunction with sandpile models and closely related chip-firing games.

preprint2010arXiv

Approximability of Sparse Integer Programs

The main focus of this paper is a pair of new approximation algorithms for certain integer programs. First, for covering integer programs {min cx: Ax >= b, 0 <= x <= d} where A has at most k nonzeroes per row, we give a k-approximation algorithm. (We assume A, b, c, d are nonnegative.) For any k >= 2 and eps>0, if P != NP this ratio cannot be improved to k-1-eps, and under the unique games conjecture this ratio cannot be improved to k-eps. One key idea is to replace individual constraints by others that have better rounding properties but the same nonnegative integral solutions; another critical ingredient is knapsack-cover inequalities. Second, for packing integer programs {max cx: Ax <= b, 0 <= x <= d} where A has at most k nonzeroes per column, we give a (2k^2+2)-approximation algorithm. Our approach builds on the iterated LP relaxation framework. In addition, we obtain improved approximations for the second problem when k=2, and for both problems when every A_{ij} is small compared to b_i. Finally, we demonstrate a 17/16-inapproximability for covering integer programs with at most two nonzeroes per column.