Paper detail

Facility Location with Client Latencies: Linear-Programming based Techniques for Minimum-Latency Problems

We introduce a problem that is a common generalization of the uncapacitated facility location and minimum latency (ML) problems, where facilities need to be opened to serve clients and also need to be sequentially activated before they can provide service. Formally, we are given a set \F of n facilities with facility-opening costs {f_i}, a set of m clients, and connection costs {c_{ij}} specifying the cost of assigning a client j to a facility i, a root node r denoting the depot, and a time metric d on \F\cup{r}. Our goal is to open a subset F of facilities, find a path P starting at r and spanning F to activate the open facilities, and connect each client j to a facility ϕ(j)\in F, so as to minimize \sum_{i\in F}f_i +\sum_{clients j}(c_{ϕ(j),j}+t_j), where t_j is the time taken to reach ϕ(j) along path P. We call this the minimum latency uncapacitated facility location (MLUFL) problem. Our main result is an O(\log n\max{\log n,\log m})-approximation for MLUFL. We also show that any improvement in this approximation guarantee, implies an improvement in the (current-best) approximation factor for group Steiner tree. We obtain constant approximations for two natural special cases of the problem: (a) related MLUFL (metric connection costs that are a scalar multiple of the time metric); (b) metric uniform MLUFL (metric connection costs, unform time-metric). Our LP-based methods are versatile and easily adapted to yield approximation guarantees for MLUFL in various more general settings, such as (i) when the latency-cost of a client is a function of the delay faced by the facility to which it is connected; and (ii) the k-route version, where k vehicles are routed in parallel to activate the open facilities. Our LP-based understanding of MLUFL also offers some LP-based insights into ML, which we believe is a promising direction for obtaining improvements for ML.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.