Paper detail

Subquadratic Submodular Function Minimization

Submodular function minimization (SFM) is a fundamental discrete optimization problem which generalizes many well known problems, has applications in various fields, and can be solved in polynomial time. Owing to applications in computer vision and machine learning, fast SFM algorithms are highly desirable. The current fastest algorithms [Lee, Sidford, Wong, FOCS 2015] run in $O(n^{2}\log nM\cdot\textrm{EO} +n^{3}\log^{O(1)}nM)$ time and $O(n^{3}\log^{2}n\cdot \textrm{EO} +n^{4}\log^{O(1)}n$) time respectively, where $M$ is the largest absolute value of the function (assuming the range is integers) and $\textrm{EO}$ is the time taken to evaluate the function on any set. Although the best known lower bound on the query complexity is only $Ω(n)$, the current shortest non-deterministic proof certifying the optimum value of a function requires $Θ(n^{2})$ function evaluations. The main contribution of this paper are subquadratic SFM algorithms. For integer-valued submodular functions, we give an SFM algorithm which runs in $O(nM^{3}\log n\cdot\textrm{EO})$ time giving the first nearly linear time algorithm in any known regime. For real-valued submodular functions with range in $[-1,1]$, we give an algorithm which in $\tilde{O}(n^{5/3}\cdot\textrm{EO}/\varepsilon^{2})$ time returns an $\varepsilon$-additive approximate solution. At the heart of it, our algorithms are projected stochastic subgradient descent methods on the Lovasz extension of submodular functions where we crucially exploit submodularity and data structures to obtain fast, i.e. sublinear time subgradient updates. . The latter is crucial for beating the $n^{2}$ bound as we show that algorithms which access only subgradients of the Lovasz extension, and these include the theoretically best algorithms mentioned above, must make $Ω(n)$ subgradient calls (even for functions whose range is $\{-1,0,1\}$).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.