Optimal bounds for monotonicity and Lipschitz testing over hypercubes and hypergrids

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Abstract

The problem of monotonicity testing over the hypergrid and its special case, the hypercube, is a classic, well-studied, yet unsolved question in property testing. We are given query access to f:[k]n↦Rf:[k]^n \mapsto \R (for some ordered range R\R). The hypergrid/cube has a natural partial order given by coordinate-wise ordering, denoted by ≺\prec. A function is \emph{monotone} if for all pairs x≺yx \prec y, f(x)≤f(y)f(x) \leq f(y). The distance to monotonicity, $\eps_f$, is the minimum fraction of values of ff that need to be changed to make ff monotone. For k=2k=2 (the boolean hypercube), the usual tester is the \emph{edge tester}, which checks monotonicity on adjacent pairs of domain points. It is known that the edge tester using $O(\eps^{-1}n\log|\R|)$ samples can distinguish a monotone function from one where $\eps_f > \eps$. On the other hand, the best lower bound for monotonicity testing over the hypercube is min⁡(∣R∣2,n)\min(|\R|^2,n). This leaves a quadratic gap in our knowledge, since ∣R∣|\R| can be 2n2^n. We resolve this long standing open problem and prove that $O(n/\eps)$ samples suffice for the edge tester. For hypergrids, known testers require $O(\eps^{-1}n\log k\log |\R|)$ samples, while the best known (non-adaptive) lower bound is $Ω(\eps^{-1} n\log k)$. We give a (non-adaptive) monotonicity tester for hypergrids running in $O(\eps^{-1} n\log k)$ time. Our techniques lead to optimal property testers (with the same running time) for the natural \emph{Lipschitz property} on hypercubes and hypergrids. (A cc-Lipschitz function is one where ∣f(x)−f(y)∣≤c∥x−y∥1|f(x) - f(y)| \leq c\|x-y\|_1.) In fact, we give a general unified proof for $O(\eps^{-1}n\log k)$-query testers for a class of "bounded-derivative" properties, a class containing both monotonicity and Lipschitz.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.