BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

David Pritchard

David Pritchard contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Discrete Mathematicsmath.COData Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingFormal Languages and Automata Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2011arXiv

An LP with Integrality Gap 1+epsilon for Multidimensional Knapsack

In this note we study packing or covering integer programs with at most k constraints, which are also known as k-dimensional knapsack problems. For any integer k > 0 and real epsilon > 0, we observe there is a polynomial-sized LP for the k-dimensional knapsack problem with integrality gap at most 1+epsilon. The variables may be unbounded or have arbitrary upper bounds. In the packing case, we can also remove the dependence of the LP on the cost-function, yielding a polyhedral approximation of the integer hull. This generalizes a recent result of Bienstock on the classical knapsack problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Approximability of Sparse Integer Programs

The main focus of this paper is a pair of new approximation algorithms for certain integer programs. First, for covering integer programs {min cx: Ax >= b, 0 <= x <= d} where A has at most k nonzeroes per row, we give a k-approximation algorithm. (We assume A, b, c, d are nonnegative.) For any k >= 2 and eps>0, if P != NP this ratio cannot be improved to k-1-eps, and under the unique games conjecture this ratio cannot be improved to k-eps. One key idea is to replace individual constraints by others that have better rounding properties but the same nonnegative integral solutions; another critical ingredient is knapsack-cover inequalities. Second, for packing integer programs {max cx: Ax <= b, 0 <= x <= d} where A has at most k nonzeroes per column, we give a (2k^2+2)-approximation algorithm. Our approach builds on the iterated LP relaxation framework. In addition, we obtain improved approximations for the second problem when k=2, and for both problems when every A_{ij} is small compared to b_i. Finally, we demonstrate a 17/16-inapproximability for covering integer programs with at most two nonzeroes per column.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Edge Cover Colouring Versus Minimum Degree in Multigraphs

An edge colouring of a multigraph can be thought of as a partition of the edges into matchings (a matching meets each vertex at most once). Analogously, an edge cover colouring is a partition of the edges into edge covers (an edge cover meets each vertex at least once). We aim to determine a tight lower bound on the maximum number of parts in an edge cover colouring as a function of the minimum degree delta, which would be an analogue of Shannon&#39;s theorem from 1949 on edge-colouring multigraphs. We are able to give a lower bound that is tight except when delta=9 or delta is odd and > 12; in these non-tight cases the best upper and lower bounds differ by one.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Efficient Divide-and-Conquer Implementations Of Symmetric FSAs

A deterministic finite-state automaton (FSA) is an abstract sequential machine that reads the symbols comprising an input word one at a time. An FSA is symmetric if its output is independent of the order in which the input symbols are read, i.e., if the output is invariant under permutations of the input. We show how to convert a symmetric FSA A into an automaton-like divide-and-conquer process whose intermediate results are no larger than the size of A&#39;s memory. In comparison, a similar result for general FSA&#39;s has been long known via functional composition, but entails an exponential increase in memory size. The new result has applications to parallel processing and symmetric FSA networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Fast Computation of Small Cuts via Cycle Space Sampling

We describe a new sampling-based method to determine cuts in an undirected graph. For a graph (V, E), its cycle space is the family of all subsets of E that have even degree at each vertex. We prove that with high probability, sampling the cycle space identifies the cuts of a graph. This leads to simple new linear-time sequential algorithms for finding all cut edges and cut pairs (a set of 2 edges that form a cut) of a graph. In the model of distributed computing in a graph G=(V, E) with O(log V)-bit messages, our approach yields faster algorithms for several problems. The diameter of G is denoted by Diam, and the maximum degree by Delta. We obtain simple O(Diam)-time distributed algorithms to find all cut edges, 2-edge-connected components, and cut pairs, matching or improving upon previous time bounds. Under natural conditions these new algorithms are universally optimal --- i.e. a Omega(Diam)-time lower bound holds on every graph. We obtain a O(Diam+Delta/log V)-time distributed algorithm for finding cut vertices; this is faster than the best previous algorithm when Delta, Diam = O(sqrt(V)). A simple extension of our work yields the first distributed algorithm with sub-linear time for 3-edge-connected components. The basic distributed algorithms are Monte Carlo, but they can be made Las Vegas without increasing the asymptotic complexity. In the model of parallel computing on the EREW PRAM our approach yields a simple algorithm with optimal time complexity O(log V) for finding cut pairs and 3-edge-connected components.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Integrality Gap of the Hypergraphic Relaxation of Steiner Trees: a short proof of a 1.55 upper bound

Recently Byrka, Grandoni, Rothvoss and Sanita (at STOC 2010) gave a 1.39-approximation for the Steiner tree problem, using a hypergraph-based linear programming relaxation. They also upper-bounded its integrality gap by 1.55. We describe a shorter proof of the same integrality gap bound, by applying some of their techniques to a randomized loss-contracting algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

k-Edge-Connectivity: Approximation and LP Relaxation

In the k-edge-connected spanning subgraph problem we are given a graph (V, E) and costs for each edge, and want to find a minimum-cost subset F of E such that (V, F) is k-edge-connected. We show there is a constant eps > 0 so that for all k > 1, finding a (1 + eps)-approximation for k-ECSS is NP-hard, establishing a gap between the unit-cost and general-cost versions. Next, we consider the multi-subgraph cousin of k-ECSS, in which we purchase a multi-subset F of E, with unlimited parallel copies available at the same cost as the original edge. We conjecture that a (1 + Theta(1/k))-approximation algorithm exists, and we describe an approach based on graph decompositions applied to its natural linear programming (LP) relaxation. The LP is essentially equivalent to the Held-Karp LP for TSP and the undirected LP for Steiner tree. We give a family of extreme points for the LP which are more complex than those previously known.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Limits of Approximation Algorithms: PCPs and Unique Games (DIMACS Tutorial Lecture Notes)

These are the lecture notes for the DIMACS Tutorial &#34;Limits of Approximation Algorithms: PCPs and Unique Games&#34; held at the DIMACS Center, CoRE Building, Rutgers University on 20-21 July, 2009. This tutorial was jointly sponsored by the DIMACS Special Focus on Hardness of Approximation, the DIMACS Special Focus on Algorithmic Foundations of the Internet, and the Center for Computational Intractability with support from the National Security Agency and the National Science Foundation. The speakers at the tutorial were Matthew Andrews, Sanjeev Arora, Moses Charikar, Prahladh Harsha, Subhash Khot, Dana Moshkovitz and Lisa Zhang. The sribes were Ashkan Aazami, Dev Desai, Igor Gorodezky, Geetha Jagannathan, Alexander S. Kulikov, Darakhshan J. Mir, Alantha Newman, Aleksandar Nikolov, David Pritchard and Gwen Spencer.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access