BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jochen Koenemann

Jochen Koenemann contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computer Science and Game TheoryData Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete Mathematicsmath.COmath.OC

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Approximating Stable Matchings with Ties of Bounded Size

Finding a stable matching is one of the central problems in algorithmic game theory. If participants are allowed to have ties and incomplete preferences, computing a stable matching of maximum cardinality is known to be NP-hard. In this paper we present a $(3L-2)/(2L-1)$-approximation algorithm for the stable matching problem with ties of size at most $L$ and incomplete lists. Our result matches the known lower bound on the integrality gap for the associated LP formulation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Network bargaining with general capacities

We study balanced solutions for network bargaining games with general capacities, where agents can participate in a fixed but arbitrary number of contracts. We provide the first polynomial time algorithm for computing balanced solutions for these games. In addition, we prove that an instance has a balanced solution if and only if it has a stable one. Our methods use a new idea of reducing an instance with general capacities to a network bargaining game with unit capacities defined on an auxiliary graph. This represents a departure from previous approaches, which rely on computing an allocation in the intersection of the core and prekernel of a corresponding cooperative game, and then proving that the solution corresponding to this allocation is balanced. In fact, we show that such cooperative game methods do not extend to general capacity games, since contrary to the case of unit capacities, there exist allocations in the intersection of the core and prekernel with no corresponding balanced solution. Finally, we identify two sufficient conditions under which the set of balanced solutions corresponds to the intersection of the core and prekernel, thereby extending the class of games for which this result was previously known.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Efficient Algorithms for Solving Hypergraphic Steiner Tree Relaxations in Quasi-Bipartite Instances

We consider the Steiner tree problem in quasi-bipartite graphs, where no two Steiner vertices are connected by an edge. For this class of instances, we present an efficient algorithm to exactly solve the so called directed component relaxation (DCR), a specific form of hypergraphic LP relaxation that was instrumental in the recent break-through result by Byrka et al. [BGRS10] (STOC 2010). Our algorithm hinges on an efficiently computable map from extreme points of the bidirected cut relaxation to feasible solutions of (DCR). As a consequence, together with [BGRS10] we immediately obtain an efficient 73/60-approximation for quasi-bipartite Steiner tree instances. We also present a particularly simple (BCR)-based random sampling algorithm that achieves a performance guarantee slightly better than 77/60.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Network Bargaining: Using Approximate Blocking Sets to Stabilize Unstable Instances

We study a network extension to the Nash bargaining game, as introduced by Kleinberg and Tardos (STOC'08), where the set of players corresponds to vertices in a graph $G=(V,E)$ and each edge $ij\in E$ represents a possible deal between players $i$ and $j$. We reformulate the problem as a cooperative game and study the following question: Given a game with an empty core (i.e. an unstable game) is it possible, through minimal changes in the underlying network, to stabilize the game? We show that by removing edges in the network that belong to a blocking set we can find a stable solution in polynomial time. This motivates the problem of finding small blocking sets. While it has been previously shown that finding the smallest blocking set is NP-hard (Biro,Kern,Paulusma, TAMC'10), we show that it is possible to efficiently find approximate blocking sets in sparse graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Integrality Gap of the Hypergraphic Relaxation of Steiner Trees: a short proof of a 1.55 upper bound

Recently Byrka, Grandoni, Rothvoss and Sanita (at STOC 2010) gave a 1.39-approximation for the Steiner tree problem, using a hypergraph-based linear programming relaxation. They also upper-bounded its integrality gap by 1.55. We describe a shorter proof of the same integrality gap bound, by applying some of their techniques to a randomized loss-contracting algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access