Measurement of the decay B→DℓνℓB\to D\ellν_\ell in fully reconstructed events and determination of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix element ∣Vcb∣|V_{cb}|

preprint2016arXivOpen access
R. GlattauerC. SchwandaA. AbdesselamI. AdachiK. AdamczykH. AiharaS. Al SaidD. M. AsnerT. AushevR. AyadT. AzizI. BadhreesA. M. BakichV. BansalE. BarberioB. BhuyanJ. BiswalG. BonviciniA. BozekM. BračkoF. BreibeckT. E. BrowderD. ČervenkovV. ChekelianA. ChenB. G. CheonK. ChilikinR. ChistovK. ChoV. ChobanovaY. ChoiD. CinabroJ. DalsenoM. DanilovN. DashJ. DingfelderZ. DoležalA. DrutskoyD. DuttaS. EidelmanH. FarhatJ. E. FastT. FerberA. FreyB. G. FulsomV. GaurN. GabyshevA. GarmashR. GillardY. M. GohP. GoldenzweigB. GolobD. GreenwaldJ. HabaP. HamerT. HaraJ. HasenbuschK. HayasakaH. HayashiiW. -S. HouC. -L. HsuT. IijimaK. InamiG. IngugliaA. IshikawaH. B. JeonD. JoffeK. K. JooT. JuliusK. H. KangE. KatoT. KawasakiC. KieslingD. Y. KimJ. B. KimJ. H. KimK. T. KimM. J. KimS. H. KimY. J. KimK. KinoshitaP. KodyšS. KorparP. KrižanP. KrokovnyT. KuhrA. KuzminY. -J. KwonI. S. LeeL. LiY. LiJ. LibbyY. LiuD. LiventsevP. LukinJ. MacNaughtonM. MasudaD. MatvienkoK. MiyabayashiH. MiyataR. MizukG. B. MohantyS. MohantyA. MollH. K. MoonR. MussaE. NakanoM. NakaoT. NanutZ. NatkaniecM. NayakN. K. NisarS. NishidaS. OgawaS. OkunoC. OswaldP. PakhlovG. PakhlovaB. PalH. ParkT. K. PedlarL. PesántezR. PestotnikM. PetričL. E. PiilonenC. PulvermacherJ. RauchE. RibežlM. RitterA. RostomyanH. SahooY. SakaiS. SandilyaL. SanteljT. SanukiV. SavinovO. SchneiderG. SchnellA. J. SchwartzY. SeinoK. SenyoO. SeonM. E. SeviorV. ShebalinT. -A. ShibataJ. -G. ShiuB. ShwartzA. SibidanovF. SimonY. -S. SohnA. SokolovE. SolovievaM. StaričT. SumiyoshiU. TamponiY. TeramotoK. TrabelsiV. TrusovM. UchidaY. UnnoS. UnoP. UrquijoY. UsovC. Van HulseP. VanhoeferG. VarnerK. E. VarvellV. VorobyevA. VossenC. H. WangM. -Z. WangP. WangY. WatanabeE. WonH. YamamotoY. YamashitaY. YookZ. P. ZhangV. ZhilichV. ZhulanovA. Zupanc

Abstract

We present a determination of the magnitude of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix element ∣Vcb∣|V_{cb}| using the decay B→DℓνℓB\to D\ellν_\ell (ℓ=e,μ\ell=e,μ) based on 711 fb−1^{-1} of e+e−→Υ(4S)e^+e^-\to Υ(4S) data recorded by the Belle detector and containing 772×106772 \times 10^6 BBˉB\bar{B} pairs. One BB meson in the event is fully reconstructed in a hadronic decay mode while the other, on the signal side, is partially reconstructed from a charged lepton and either a D+D^+ or D0D^0 meson in a total of 23 hadronic decay modes. The isospin-averaged branching fraction of the decay B→DℓνℓB\to D\ellν_\ell is found to be B(B0→D−ℓ+νℓ)=(2.31±0.03(stat)±0.11(syst))%\mathcal{B}(B^0 \to D^- \ell^+ ν_{\ell})=(2.31\pm 0.03(\mathrm{stat})\pm 0.11(\mathrm{syst}))\%. Analyzing the differential decay rate as a function of the hadronic recoil with the parameterization of Caprini, Lelouch and Neubert and using the form-factor prediction G(1)=1.0541±0.0083\mathcal{G}(1)=1.0541\pm 0.0083 calculated by FNAL/MILC, we obtain ηEW∣Vcb∣=(40.12±1.34)×10−3η_\mathrm{EW}|V_{cb}|=(40.12\pm 1.34)\times 10^{-3}, where ηEWη_\mathrm{EW} is the electroweak correction factor. Alternatively, assuming the model-independent form-factor parameterization of Boyd, Grinstein and Lebed and using lattice QCD data from the FNAL/MILC and HPQCD collaborations, we find ηEW∣Vcb∣=(41.10±1.14)×10−3η_\mathrm{EW}|V_{cb}|=(41.10 \pm 1.14)\times 10^{-3}.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.