Paper detail

Measurement of $\mathcal{R}(D)$ and $\mathcal{R}(D^*)$ with a semileptonic tagging method

The experimental results on the ratios of branching fractions $\mathcal{R}(D) = {\cal B}(\bar{B} \to D τ^- \barν_τ)/{\cal B}(\bar{B} \to D \ell^- \barν_{\ell})$ and $\mathcal{R}(D^*) = {\cal B}(\bar{B} \to D^* τ^- \barν_τ)/{\cal B}(\bar{B} \to D^* \ell^- \barν_{\ell})$, where $\ell$ denotes an electron or a muon, show a long-standing discrepancy with the Standard Model predictions, and might hint to a violation of lepton flavor universality. We report a new simultaneous measurement of $\mathcal{R}(D)$ and $\mathcal{R}(D^*)$, based on a data sample containing $772 \times 10^6$ $B\bar{B}$ events recorded at the $Υ(4S)$ resonance with the Belle detector at the KEKB $e^+ e^-$ collider. In this analysis the tag-side $B$ meson is reconstructed in a semileptonic decay mode and the signal-side $τ$ is reconstructed in a purely leptonic decay. The measured values are $\mathcal{R}(D)= 0.307 \pm 0.037 \pm 0.016$ and $\mathcal{R}(D^*) = 0.283 \pm 0.018 \pm 0.014$, where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second are systematic. These results are in agreement with the Standard Model predictions within $0.2$, $1.1$ and $0.8$ standard deviations for $\mathcal{R}(D)$, $\mathcal{R}(D^*)$ and their combination, respectively. This work constitutes the most precise measurements of $\mathcal{R}(D)$ and $\mathcal{R}(D^*)$ performed to date as well as the first result for $\mathcal{R}(D)$ based on a semileptonic tagging method.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
The Belle CollaborationG. CariaP. UrquijoI. AdachiH. AiharaS. Al SaidD. M. AsnerH. AtmacanT. AushevV. BabuI. BadhreesA. M. BakichP. BeheraC. BeleñoJ. BennettB. BhuyanT. BilkaJ. BiswalM. BračkoT. E. BrowderM. CampajolaD. ČervenkovP. ChangR. CheaibV. ChekelianA. ChenB. G. CheonK. ChilikinH. E. ChoK. ChoY. ChoiS. ChoudhuryD. CinabroS. CunliffeN. DashG. De NardoF. Di CapuaS. Di CarloZ. DoležalT. V. DongS. EidelmanD. EpifanovJ. E. FastT. FerberD. FerlewiczB. G. FulsomR. GargV. GaurN. GabyshevA. GarmashA. GiriP. GoldenzweigD. GreenwaldO. GrzymkowskaY. GuanO. HartbrichK. HayasakaH. HayashiiT. HiguchiW. -S. HouC. -L. HsuK. InamiG. IngugliaA. IshikawaR. ItohM. IwasakiY. IwasakiW. W. JacobsH. B. JeonS. JiaY. JinD. JoffeK. K. JooA. B. KaliyarK. H. KangG. KaryanT. KawasakiH. KichimiC. H. KimD. Y. KimH. J. KimK. T. KimS. H. KimK. KinoshitaP. KodyšS. KorparD. KotchetkovR. KroegerP. KrokovnyR. KumarY. -J. KwonJ. S. LangeI. S. LeeJ. K. LeeS. C. LeeL. K. LiY. B. LiL. Li GioiJ. LibbyK. LieretD. LiventsevT. LuoM. MasudaT. MatsudaD. MatvienkoM. MerolaF. MetznerK. MiyabayashiG. B. MohantyT. J. MoonT. MoriR. MussaK. R. NakamuraK. J. NathM. NayakN. K. NisarS. NishidaK. NishimuraK. OgawaH. OnoY. OnukiP. OskinP. PakhlovG. PakhlovaB. PalT. PangH. ParkS. -H. ParkS. PatraS. PaulT. K. PedlarR. PestotnikL. E. PiilonenV. PopovE. PrencipeM. T. PrimA. RabusovP. K. ResmiM. RitterG. RussoD. SahooS. SandilyaL. SanteljT. SanukiO. SchneiderG. SchnellJ. SchuelerC. SchwandaY. SeinoK. SenyoM. E. SeviorV. ShebalinJ. -G. ShiuB. ShwartzF. SimonA. SokolovE. SolovievaM. StaričZ. S. StottlerT. SumiyoshiW. SutcliffeM. TakizawaU. TamponiK. TanidaF. TenchiniM. UchidaT. UglovS. UnoY. UsovS. E. VahsenR. van TonderG. VarnerA. VossenE. WaheedB. WangC. H. WangM. -Z. WangP. WangX. L. WangS. WatanukiJ. WiechczynskiE. WonH. YamamotoS. B. YangH. YeJ. H. YinC. Z. YuanZ. P. ZhangV. ZhilichV. ZhukovaV. Zhulanov
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

The Belle CollaborationG. CariaP. UrquijoI. AdachiH. AiharaS. Al SaidD. M. AsnerH. AtmacanT. AushevV. BabuI. BadhreesA. M. BakichP. BeheraC. BeleñoJ. BennettB. BhuyanT. BilkaJ. BiswalM. BračkoT. E. BrowderM. CampajolaD. ČervenkovP. ChangR. CheaibV. ChekelianA. ChenB. G. CheonK. ChilikinH. E. ChoK. ChoY. ChoiS. ChoudhuryD. CinabroS. CunliffeN. DashG. De NardoF. Di CapuaS. Di CarloZ. DoležalT. V. DongS. EidelmanD. EpifanovJ. E. FastT. FerberD. FerlewiczB. G. FulsomR. GargV. GaurN. GabyshevA. GarmashA. GiriP. GoldenzweigD. GreenwaldO. GrzymkowskaY. GuanO. HartbrichK. HayasakaH. HayashiiT. HiguchiW. -S. HouC. -L. HsuK. InamiG. IngugliaA. IshikawaR. ItohM. IwasakiY. IwasakiW. W. JacobsH. B. JeonS. JiaY. JinD. JoffeK. K. JooA. B. KaliyarK. H. KangG. KaryanT. KawasakiH. KichimiC. H. KimD. Y. KimH. J. KimK. T. KimS. H. KimK. KinoshitaP. KodyšS. KorparD. KotchetkovR. KroegerP. KrokovnyR. KumarY. -J. KwonJ. S. LangeI. S. LeeJ. K. LeeS. C. LeeL. K. LiY. B. LiL. Li GioiJ. LibbyK. LieretD. LiventsevT. LuoM. MasudaT. MatsudaD. MatvienkoM. MerolaF. MetznerK. MiyabayashiG. B. MohantyT. J. MoonT. MoriR. MussaK. R. NakamuraK. J. NathM. NayakN. K. NisarS. NishidaK. NishimuraK. OgawaH. OnoY. OnukiP. OskinP. PakhlovG. PakhlovaB. PalT. PangH. ParkS. -H. ParkS. PatraS. PaulT. K. PedlarR. PestotnikL. E. PiilonenV. PopovE. PrencipeM. T. PrimA. RabusovP. K. ResmiM. RitterG. RussoD. SahooS. SandilyaL. SanteljT. SanukiO. SchneiderG. SchnellJ. SchuelerC. SchwandaY. SeinoK. SenyoM. E. SeviorV. ShebalinJ. -G. ShiuB. ShwartzF. SimonA. SokolovE. SolovievaM. StaričZ. S. StottlerT. SumiyoshiW. SutcliffeM. TakizawaU. TamponiK. TanidaF. TenchiniM. UchidaT. UglovS. UnoY. UsovS. E. VahsenR. van TonderG. VarnerA. VossenE. WaheedB. WangC. H. WangM. -Z. WangP. WangX. L. WangS. WatanukiJ. WiechczynskiE. WonH. YamamotoS. B. YangH. YeJ. H. YinC. Z. YuanZ. P. ZhangV. ZhilichV. ZhukovaV. Zhulanov

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.