Paper detail

Dalitz analysis of $D^{0}\to K^{-}π^{+}η$ decays at Belle

We present the results of the first Dalitz plot analysis of the decay $D^{0}\to K^{-}π^{+}η$. The analysis is performed on a data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 953 $\rm{fb}^{-1}$ collected by the Belle detector at the asymmetric-energy $e^{+}e^{-}$ KEKB collider. The Dalitz plot is well described by a combination of the six resonant decay channels $\bar{K}^{*}(892)^0η$, $K^{-}a_0(980)^+$, $K^{-}a_2(1320)^+$, $\bar{K}^{*}(1410)^0η$, $K^{*}(1680)^-π^{+}$ and $K_2^{*}(1980)^-π^{+}$, together with $Kπ$ and $Kη$ S-wave components. The decays $K^{*}(1680)^{-}\to K^{-}η$ and $K_{2}^{*}(1980)^{-}\to K^{-}η$ are observed for the first time. We measure ratio of the branching fractions, $\frac{\mathcal{B}(D^{0}\to K^{-}π^{+}η)}{\mathcal{B}(D^{0}\to K^{-}π^{+})}=0.500\pm0.002{\rm(stat)}\pm0.020{\rm(syst)}\pm0.003{\rm (\mathcal{B}_{PDG})}$. Using the Dalitz fit result, the ratio $\frac{\mathcal{B}(K^{*}(1680)\to Kη)}{\mathcal{B}(K^{*}(1680)\to Kπ)}$ is measured to be $0.11\pm0.02{\rm(stat)}^{+0.06}_{-0.04}{\rm(syst)}\pm0.04{\rm(\mathcal{B}_{\text{PDG}})}$; this is much lower than the theoretical expectations ($\approx1$) made under the assumption that $K^{*}(1680)$ is a pure $1^{3}D_1$ state. The product branching fraction $\mathcal{B}(D^0\to [K_2^{*}(1980)^-\to K^{-}η]π^{+})=(2.2^{+1.7}_{-1.9})\times10^{-4}$ is determined. In addition, the $πη^{\prime}$ contribution to the $a_0(980)^{\pm}$ resonance shape is confirmed with 10.1$σ$ statistical significance using the three-channel Flatté model. We also measure $\mathcal{B}(D^0\to\bar{K}^{*}(892)^0η)=(1.41^{+0.13}_{-0.12})\%$. This is consistent with, and more precise than, the current world average $(1.02\pm0.30)\%$, deviates with a significance of more than $3σ$ from the theoretical predictions of (0.51-0.92)%.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
Belle CollaborationY. Q. ChenL. K. LiW. B. YanI. AdachiH. AiharaS. Al SaidD. M. AsnerH. AtmacanV. AulchenkoT. AushevR. AyadV. BabuI. BadhreesS. BahinipatiP. BeheraJ. BennettV. BhardwajT. BilkaJ. BiswalA. BozekM. BračkoT. E. BrowderM. CampajolaL. CaoD. ČervenkovM. -C. ChangV. ChekelianA. ChenB. G. CheonK. ChilikinH. E. ChoK. ChoS. -K. ChoiY. ChoiS. ChoudhuryD. CinabroS. CunliffeN. DashG. De NardoF. Di CapuaZ. DoležalT. V. DongS. EidelmanD. EpifanovJ. E. FastT. FerberD. FerlewiczB. G. FulsomR. GargV. GaurN. GabyshevA. GarmashA. GiriP. GoldenzweigB. GolobO. HartbrichK. HayasakaH. HayashiiW. -S. HouC. -L. HsuK. InamiG. IngugliaA. IshikawaR. ItohM. IwasakiY. IwasakiW. W. JacobsE. -J. JangH. B. JeonS. JiaY. JinK. K. JooK. H. KangG. KaryanT. KawasakiD. Y. KimS. H. KimT. D. KimmelK. KinoshitaP. KodyšS. KorparP. KrižanR. KroegerP. KrokovnyT. KuhrR. KulasiriR. KumarA. KuzminY. -J. KwonK. LalwaniJ. S. LangeI. S. LeeS. C. LeeY. B. LiL. Li GioiJ. LibbyK. LieretD. LiventsevJ. MacNaughtonC. MacQueenM. MasudaD. MatvienkoM. MerolaK. MiyabayashiR. MizukS. MohantyR. MussaM. NakaoZ. NatkaniecM. NayakS. NishidaS. OgawaH. OnoP. OskinP. PakhlovG. PakhlovaS. PardiH. ParkS. PatraS. PaulT. K. PedlarR. PestotnikL. E. PiilonenT. PodobnikV. PopovE. PrencipeM. T. PrimA. RabusovM. RitterM. RöhrkenN. RoutG. RussoD. SahooT. SanukiV. SavinovO. SchneiderG. SchnellJ. SchuelerC. SchwandaA. J. SchwartzY. SeinoK. SenyoM. E. SeviorM. ShapkinV. ShebalinJ. -G. ShiuA. SokolovE. SolovievaM. StaričZ. S. StottlerM. SumihamaT. SumiyoshiW. SutcliffeM. TakizawaK. TanidaF. TenchiniK. TrabelsiM. UchidaT. UglovS. UnoP. UrquijoG. VarnerV. VorobyevC. H. WangE. WangM. -Z. WangP. WangM. WatanabeE. WonX. XuS. B. YangH. YeJ. H. YinC. Z. YuanY. YusaZ. P. ZhangV. ZhilichV. ZhukovaV. Zhulanov

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access180 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Belle CollaborationY. Q. ChenL. K. LiW. B. YanI. AdachiH. AiharaS. Al SaidD. M. AsnerH. AtmacanV. AulchenkoT. AushevR. AyadV. BabuI. BadhreesS. BahinipatiP. BeheraJ. BennettV. BhardwajT. BilkaJ. BiswalA. BozekM. BračkoT. E. BrowderM. CampajolaL. CaoD. ČervenkovM. -C. ChangV. ChekelianA. ChenB. G. CheonK. ChilikinH. E. ChoK. ChoS. -K. ChoiY. ChoiS. ChoudhuryD. CinabroS. CunliffeN. DashG. De NardoF. Di CapuaZ. DoležalT. V. DongS. EidelmanD. EpifanovJ. E. FastT. FerberD. FerlewiczB. G. FulsomR. GargV. GaurN. GabyshevA. GarmashA. GiriP. GoldenzweigB. GolobO. HartbrichK. HayasakaH. HayashiiW. -S. HouC. -L. HsuK. InamiG. IngugliaA. IshikawaR. ItohM. IwasakiY. IwasakiW. W. JacobsE. -J. JangH. B. JeonS. JiaY. JinK. K. JooK. H. KangG. KaryanT. KawasakiD. Y. KimS. H. KimT. D. KimmelK. KinoshitaP. KodyšS. KorparP. KrižanR. KroegerP. KrokovnyT. KuhrR. KulasiriR. KumarA. KuzminY. -J. KwonK. LalwaniJ. S. LangeI. S. LeeS. C. LeeY. B. LiL. Li GioiJ. LibbyK. LieretD. LiventsevJ. MacNaughtonC. MacQueenM. MasudaD. MatvienkoM. MerolaK. MiyabayashiR. MizukS. MohantyR. MussaM. NakaoZ. NatkaniecM. NayakS. NishidaS. OgawaH. OnoP. OskinP. PakhlovG. PakhlovaS. PardiH. ParkS. PatraS. PaulT. K. PedlarR. PestotnikL. E. PiilonenT. PodobnikV. PopovE. PrencipeM. T. PrimA. RabusovM. RitterM. RöhrkenN. RoutG. RussoD. SahooT. SanukiV. SavinovO. SchneiderG. SchnellJ. SchuelerC. SchwandaA. J. SchwartzY. SeinoK. SenyoM. E. SeviorM. ShapkinV. ShebalinJ. -G. ShiuA. SokolovE. SolovievaM. StaričZ. S. StottlerM. SumihamaT. SumiyoshiW. SutcliffeM. TakizawaK. TanidaF. TenchiniK. TrabelsiM. UchidaT. UglovS. UnoP. UrquijoG. VarnerV. VorobyevC. H. WangE. WangM. -Z. WangP. WangM. WatanabeE. WonX. XuS. B. YangH. YeJ. H. YinC. Z. YuanY. YusaZ. P. ZhangV. ZhilichV. ZhukovaV. Zhulanov

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.