BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Uriel Feige

Uriel Feige appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputer Science and Game Theorymath.CODiscrete Mathematicsmath.PRComputational Complexityecon.THArtificial IntelligenceComputer VisionDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingInformation TheoryMachine Learningmath.IT

Catalog footprint

What is connected

27works
13topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

27 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Are Gross Substitutes a Substitute for Submodular Valuations?

The class of gross substitutes (GS) set functions plays a central role in Economics and Computer Science. GS belongs to the hierarchy of {\em complement free} valuations introduced by Lehmann, Lehmann and Nisan, along with other prominent classes: $GS \subsetneq Submodular \subsetneq XOS \subsetneq Subadditive$. The GS class has always been more enigmatic than its counterpart classes, both in its definition and in its relation to the other classes. For example, while it is well understood how closely the Submodular, XOS and Subadditive classes (point-wise) approximate one another, approximability of these classes by GS remained wide open. Our main result is the existence of a submodular valuation (one that is also budget additive) that cannot be approximated by GS within a ratio better than $Ω(\frac{\log m}{\log\log m})$, where $m$ is the number of items. En route, we uncover a new symmetrization operation that preserves GS, which may be of independent interest. We show that our main result is tight with respect to budget additive valuations. Additionally, for a class of submodular functions that we refer to as {\em concave of Rado} valuations (this class greatly extends budget additive valuations), we show approximability by GS within an $O(\log^2m)$ factor.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Best-of-Both-Worlds Fair-Share Allocations

We consider the problem of fair allocation of indivisible items among $n$ agents with additive valuations, when agents have equal entitlements to the goods, and there are no transfers. Best-of-Both-Worlds (BoBW) fairness mechanisms aim to give all agents both an ex-ante guarantee (such as getting the proportional share in expectation) and an ex-post guarantee. Prior BoBW results have focused on ex-post guarantees that are based on the "up to one item" paradigm, such as envy-free up to one item (EF1). In this work we attempt to give every agent a high value ex-post, and specifically, a constant fraction of his maximin share (MMS). The up to one item paradigm fails to give such a guarantee, and it is not difficult to present examples in which previous BoBW mechanisms give agents only a $\frac{1}{n}$ fraction of their MMS. Our main result is a deterministic polynomial time algorithm that computes a distribution over allocations that is ex-ante proportional, and ex-post, every allocation gives every agent at least his proportional share up to one item, and more importantly, at least half of his MMS. Moreover, this last ex-post guarantee holds even with respect to a more demanding notion of a share, introduced in this paper, that we refer to as the truncated proportional share (TPS). Our guarantees are nearly best possible, in the sense that one cannot guarantee agents more than their proportional share ex-ante, and one cannot guarantee agents more than a $\frac{n}{2n-1}$ fraction of their TPS ex-post.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Fair Shares: Feasibility, Domination and Incentives

We consider fair allocation of a set $M$ of indivisible goods to $n$ equally-entitled agents, with no monetary transfers. Every agent $i$ has a valuation $v_i$ from some given class of valuation functions. A share $s$ is a function that maps a pair $(v_i,n)$ to a value, with the interpretation that if an allocation of $M$ to $n$ agents fails to give agent $i$ a bundle of value at least equal to $s(v_i,n)$, this serves as evidence that the allocation is not fair towards $i$. For such an interpretation to make sense, we would like the share to be feasible, meaning that for any valuations in the class, there is an allocation that gives every agent at least her share. The maximin share was a natural candidate for a feasible share for additive valuations. However, Kurokawa, Procaccia and Wang [2018] show that it is not feasible. We initiate a systematic study of the family of feasible shares. We say that a share is \emph{self maximizing} if truth-telling maximizes the implied guarantee. We show that every feasible share is dominated by some self-maximizing and feasible share. We seek to identify those self-maximizing feasible shares that are polynomial time computable, and offer the highest share values. We show that a SM-dominating feasible share -- one that dominates every self-maximizing (SM) feasible share -- does not exist for additive valuations (and beyond). Consequently, we relax the domination property to that of domination up to a multiplicative factor of $ρ$ (called $ρ$-dominating). For additive valuations we present shares that are feasible, self-maximizing and polynomial-time computable. For $n$ agents we present such a share that is $\frac{2n}{3n-1}$-dominating. For two agents we present such a share that is $(1 - ε)$-dominating. Moreover, for these shares we present poly-time algorithms that compute allocations that give every agent at least her share.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Improved maximin fair allocation of indivisible items to three agents

We consider the problem of approximate maximin share (MMS) allocation of indivisible items among three agents with additive valuation functions. For goods, we show that an $\frac{11}{12}$ - MMS allocation always exists, improving over the previously known bound of $\frac{8}{9}$ . Moreover, in our allocation, we can prespecify an agent that is to receive her full proportional share (PS); we also present examples showing that for such allocations the ratio of $\frac{11}{12}$ is best possible. For chores, we show that a $\frac{19}{18}$-MMS allocation always exists. Also in this case, we can prespecify an agent that is to receive no more than her PS, and we present examples showing that for such allocations the ratio of $\frac{19}{18}$ is best possible.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On allocations that give intersecting groups their fair share

We consider item allocation to individual agents who have additive valuations, in settings in which there are protected groups, and the allocation needs to give each protected group its "fair" share of the total welfare. Informally, within each protected group we consider the total welfare that the allocation gives the members of the group, and compare it to the maximum possible welfare that an allocation can give to the group members. An allocation is fair towards the group if the ratio between these two values is no worse then the relative size of the group. For divisible items, our formal definition of fairness is based on the proportional share, whereas for indivisible items, it is based on the anyprice share. We present examples in which there are no fair allocations, and even not allocations that approximate the fairness requirement within a constant multiplicative factor. We then attempt to identify sufficient conditions for fair or approximately fair allocations to exist. For example, for indivisible items, when agents have identical valuations and the family of protected groups is laminar, we show that if the items are chores, then an allocation that satisfies every fairness requirement within a multiplicative factor no worse than two exists and can be found efficiently, whereas if the items are goods, no constant approximation can be guaranteed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

How to hide a clique?

In the well known planted clique problem, a clique (or alternatively, an independent set) of size $k$ is planted at random in an Erdos-Renyi random $G(n, p)$ graph, and the goal is to design an algorithm that finds the maximum clique (or independent set) in the resulting graph. We introduce a variation on this problem, where instead of planting the clique at random, the clique is planted by an adversary who attempts to make it difficult to find the maximum clique in the resulting graph. We show that for the standard setting of the parameters of the problem, namely, a clique of size $k = \sqrt{n}$ planted in a random $G(n, \frac{1}{2})$ graph, the known polynomial time algorithms can be extended (in a non-trivial way) to work also in the adversarial setting. In contrast, we show that for other natural settings of the parameters, such as planting an independent set of size $k=\frac{n}{2}$ in a $G(n, p)$ graph with $p = n^{-\frac{1}{2}}$, there is no polynomial time algorithm that finds an independent set of size $k$, unless NP has randomized polynomial time algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Quantitative Group Testing and the rank of random matrices

Given a random Bernoulli matrix $ A\in \{0,1\}^{m\times n} $, an integer $ 0< k < n $ and the vector $ y:=Ax $, where $ x \in \{0,1\}^n $ is of Hamming weight $ k $, the objective in the {\em Quantitative Group Testing} (QGT) problem is to recover $ x $. This problem is more difficult the smaller $m$ is. For parameter ranges of interest to us, known polynomial time algorithms require values of $m$ that are much larger than $k$. In this work, we define a seemingly easier problem that we refer to as {\em Subset Select}. Given the same input as in QGT, the objective in Subset Select is to return a subset $ S \subseteq [n] $ of cardinality $ m $, such that for all $ i\in [n] $, if $ x_i = 1 $ then $ i\in S $. We show that if the square submatrix of $A$ defined by the columns indexed by $S$ has nearly full rank, then from the solution of the Subset Select problem we can recover in polynomial-time the solution $x$ to the QGT problem. We conjecture that for every polynomial time Subset Select algorithm, the resulting output matrix will satisfy the desired rank condition. We prove the conjecture for some classes of algorithms. Using this reduction, we provide some examples of how to improve known QGT algorithms. Using theoretical analysis and simulations, we demonstrate that the modified algorithms solve the QGT problem for values of $ m $ that are smaller than those required for the original algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Searching Trees with Permanently Noisy Advice: Walking and Query Algorithms

We consider a search problem on trees in which the goal is to find an adversarially placed treasure, while relying on local, partial information. Specifically, each node in the tree holds a pointer to one of its neighbors, termed \emph{advice}. A node is faulty with probability $q$. The advice at a non-faulty node points to the neighbor that is closer to the treasure, and the advice at a faulty node points to a uniformly random neighbor. Crucially, the advice is {\em permanent}, in the sense that querying the same node again would yield the same answer. Let $Δ$ denote the maximal degree. Roughly speaking, when considering the expected number of {\em moves}, i.e., edge traversals, we show that a phase transition occurs when the {\em noise parameter} $q$ is about $1/\sqrtΔ$. Below the threshold, there exists an algorithm with expected move complexity $O(D\sqrtΔ)$, where $D$ is the depth of the treasure, whereas above the threshold, every search algorithm has expected number of moves which is both exponential in $D$ and polynomial in the number of nodes~$n$. In contrast, if we require to find the treasure with probability at least $1-δ$, then for every fixed $\varepsilon > 0$, if $q<1/Δ^{\varepsilon}$ then there exists a search strategy that with probability $1-δ$ finds the treasure using $(δ^{-1}D)^{O(\frac 1 \varepsilon)}$ moves. Moreover, we show that $(δ^{-1}D)^{Ω(\frac 1 \varepsilon)}$ moves are necessary. Besides the number of moves, we also study the number of advice {\em queries} required to find the treasure. Roughly speaking, for this complexity, we show similar threshold results to those previously stated, where the parameter $D$ is replaced by $\log n$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Contagious Sets in Random Graphs

We consider the following activation process in undirected graphs: a vertex is active either if it belongs to a set of initially activated vertices or if at some point it has at least $r$ active neighbors. A \emph{contagious set} is a set whose activation results with the entire graph being active. Given a graph $G$, let $m(G,r)$ be the minimal size of a contagious set. We study this process on the binomial random graph $G:=G(n,p)$ with $p: = \frac{d}{n}$ and $1 \ll d \ll \left(\frac{n \log \log n}{\log^2 n}\right)^{\frac{r-1}{r}}$. Assuming $r > 1$ to be a constant that does not depend on $n$, we prove that $$m(G,r) = Θ\left(\frac{n}{d^{\frac{r}{r-1}}\log d}\right),$$ with high probability. We also show that the threshold probability for $m(G,r)=r$ to hold is $p^*=Θ\left(\frac{1}{(n \log^{r-1} n)^{1/r}}\right)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

On the effect of randomness on planted 3-coloring models

We present the hosted coloring framework for studying algorithmic and hardness results for the $k$-coloring problem. There is a class ${\cal H}$ of host graphs. One selects a graph $H\in{\cal H}$ and plants in it a balanced $k$-coloring (by partitioning the vertex set into $k$ roughly equal parts, and removing all edges within each part). The resulting graph $G$ is given as input to a polynomial time algorithm that needs to $k$-color $G$ (any legal $k$-coloring would do -- the algorithm is not required to recover the planted $k$-coloring). Earlier planted models correspond to the case that ${\cal H}$ is the class of all $n$-vertex $d$-regular graphs, a member $H\in{\cal H}$ is chosen at random, and then a balanced $k$-coloring is planted at random. Blum and Spencer [1995] designed algorithms for this model when $d=n^δ$ (for $0<δ\le1$), and Alon and Kahale [1997] managed to do so even when $d$ is a sufficiently large constant. The new aspect in our framework is that it need not involve randomness. In one model within the framework (with $k=3$) $H$ is a $d$ regular spectral expander (meaning that except for the largest eigenvalue of its adjacency matrix, every other eigenvalue has absolute value much smaller than $d$) chosen by an adversary, and the planted 3-coloring is random. We show that the 3-coloring algorithm of Alon and Kahale [1997] can be modified to apply to this case. In another model $H$ is a random $d$-regular graph but the planted balanced $3$-coloring is chosen by an adversary, after seeing $H$. We show that for a certain range of average degrees somewhat below $\sqrt{n}$, finding a 3-coloring is NP-hard. Together these results (and other results that we have) help clarify which aspects of randomness in the planted coloring model are the key to successful 3-coloring algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Random walks with the minimum degree local rule have $O(n^2)$ cover time

For a simple (unbiased) random walk on a connected graph with $n$ vertices, the cover time (the expected number of steps it takes to visit all vertices) is at most $O(n^3)$. We consider locally biased random walks, in which the probability of traversing an edge depends on the degrees of its endpoints. We confirm a conjecture of Abdullah, Cooper and Draief [2015] that the min-degree local bias rule ensures a cover time of $O(n^2)$. For this we formulate and prove the following lemma about spanning trees. Let $R(e)$ denote for edge $e$ the minimum degree among its two endpoints. We say that a weight function $W$ for the edges is feasible if it is nonnegative, dominated by $R$ (for every edge $W(e) \le R(e)$) and the sum over all edges of the ratios $W(e)/R(e)$ equals $n-1$. For example, in trees $W(e) = R(e)$, and in regular graphs the sum of edge weights is $d(n-1)$. {\bf Lemma:} for every feasible $W$, the minimum weight spanning tree has total weight $O(n)$. For regular graphs, a similar lemma was proved by Kahn, Linial, Nisan and Saks [1989].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Shotgun Assembly of Random Jigsaw Puzzles

In a recent work, Mossel and Ross considered the shotgun assembly problem for a random jigsaw puzzle. Their model consists of a puzzle - an $n\times n$ grid, where each vertex is viewed as a center of a piece. They assume that each of the four edges adjacent to a vertex, is assigned one of $q$ colors (corresponding to "jigs", or cut shapes) uniformly at random. Mossel and Ross asked: how large should $q = q(n)$ be so that with high probability the puzzle can be assembled uniquely given the collection of individual tiles? They showed that if $q = ω(n^2)$, then the puzzle can be assembled uniquely with high probability, while if $q = o(n^{2/3})$, then with high probability the puzzle cannot be uniquely assembled. Here we improve the upper bound and show that for any $\eps > 0$, the puzzle can be assembled uniquely with high probability if $q \geq n^{1+\eps}$. The proof uses an algorithm of $n^{Θ(1/\eps)}$ running time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

A Unifying Hierarchy of Valuations with Complements and Substitutes

We introduce a new hierarchy over monotone set functions, that we refer to as $\mathcal{MPH}$ (Maximum over Positive Hypergraphs). Levels of the hierarchy correspond to the degree of complementarity in a given function. The highest level of the hierarchy, $\mathcal{MPH}$-$m$ (where $m$ is the total number of items) captures all monotone functions. The lowest level, $\mathcal{MPH}$-$1$, captures all monotone submodular functions, and more generally, the class of functions known as $\mathcal{XOS}$. Every monotone function that has a positive hypergraph representation of rank $k$ (in the sense defined by Abraham, Babaioff, Dughmi and Roughgarden [EC 2012]) is in $\mathcal{MPH}$-$k$. Every monotone function that has supermodular degree $k$ (in the sense defined by Feige and Izsak [ITCS 2013]) is in $\mathcal{MPH}$-$(k+1)$. In both cases, the converse direction does not hold, even in an approximate sense. We present additional results that demonstrate the expressiveness power of $\mathcal{MPH}$-$k$. One can obtain good approximation ratios for some natural optimization problems, provided that functions are required to lie in low levels of the $\mathcal{MPH}$ hierarchy. We present two such applications. One shows that the maximum welfare problem can be approximated within a ratio of $k+1$ if all players hold valuation functions in $\mathcal{MPH}$-$k$. The other is an upper bound of $2k$ on the price of anarchy of simultaneous first price auctions. Being in $\mathcal{MPH}$-$k$ can be shown to involve two requirements -- one is monotonicity and the other is a certain requirement that we refer to as $\mathcal{PLE}$ (Positive Lower Envelope). Removing the monotonicity requirement, one obtains the $\mathcal{PLE}$ hierarchy over all non-negative set functions (whether monotone or not), which can be fertile ground for further research.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Chasing Ghosts: Competing with Stateful Policies

We consider sequential decision making in a setting where regret is measured with respect to a set of stateful reference policies, and feedback is limited to observing the rewards of the actions performed (the so called "bandit" setting). If either the reference policies are stateless rather than stateful, or the feedback includes the rewards of all actions (the so called "expert" setting), previous work shows that the optimal regret grows like $Θ(\sqrt{T})$ in terms of the number of decision rounds $T$. The difficulty in our setting is that the decision maker unavoidably loses track of the internal states of the reference policies, and thus cannot reliably attribute rewards observed in a certain round to any of the reference policies. In fact, in this setting it is impossible for the algorithm to estimate which policy gives the highest (or even approximately highest) total reward. Nevertheless, we design an algorithm that achieves expected regret that is sublinear in $T$, of the form $O( T/\log^{1/4}{T})$. Our algorithm is based on a certain local repetition lemma that may be of independent interest. We also show that no algorithm can guarantee expected regret better than $O( T/\log^{3/2} T)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Contagious Sets in Expanders

We consider the following activation process in undirected graphs: a vertex is active either if it belongs to a set of initially activated vertices or if at some point it has at least $r$ active neighbors, where $r>1$ is the activation threshold. A \emph{contagious set} is a set whose activation results with the entire graph being active. Given a graph $G$, let $m(G,r)$ be the minimal size of a contagious set. Computing $m(G,r)$ is NP-hard. It is known that for every $d$-regular or nearly $d$-regular graph on $n$ vertices, $m(G,r) \le O(\frac{nr}{d})$. We consider such graphs that additionally have expansion properties, parameterized by the spectral gap and/or the girth of the graphs. The general flavor of our results is that sufficiently strong expansion (e.g., $λ(G)=O(\sqrt{d})$, or girth $Ω(\log \log d)$) implies that $m(G,2) \le O(\frac{n}{d^2})$ (and more generally, $m(G,r) \le O(\frac{n}{d^{r/(r-1)}})$). Significantly weaker expansion properties suffice in order to imply that $m(G,2)\le O(\frac{n \log d}{d^2})$. For example, we show this for graphs of girth at least~7, and for graphs with $λ(G)<(1-ε)d$, provided the graph has no 4-cycles. Nearly $d$-regular expander graphs can be obtained by considering the binomial random graph $G(n,p)$ with $p \simeq \frac{d}{n}$ and $d > \log n$. For such graphs we prove that $Ω(\frac{n}{d^2 \log d}) \le m(G,2) \le O(\frac{n\log\log d}{d^2\log d})$ almost surely. Our results are algorithmic, entailing simple and efficient algorithms for selecting contagious sets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Why are images smooth?

It is a well observed phenomenon that natural images are smooth, in the sense that nearby pixels tend to have similar values. We describe a mathematical model of images that makes no assumptions on the nature of the environment that images depict. It only assumes that images can be taken at different scales (zoom levels). We provide quantitative bounds on the smoothness of a typical image in our model, as a function of the number of available scales. These bounds can serve as a baseline against which to compare the observed smoothness of natural images.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Musical chairs

In the {\em Musical Chairs} game $MC(n,m)$ a team of $n$ players plays against an adversarial {\em scheduler}. The scheduler wins if the game proceeds indefinitely, while termination after a finite number of rounds is declared a win of the team. At each round of the game each player {\em occupies} one of the $m$ available {\em chairs}. Termination (and a win of the team) is declared as soon as each player occupies a unique chair. Two players that simultaneously occupy the same chair are said to be {\em in conflict}. In other words, termination (and a win for the team) is reached as soon as there are no conflicts. The only means of communication throughout the game is this: At every round of the game, the scheduler selects an arbitrary nonempty set of players who are currently in conflict, and notifies each of them separately that it must move. A player who is thus notified changes its chair according to its deterministic program. As we show, for $m\ge 2n-1$ chairs the team has a winning strategy. Moreover, using topological arguments we show that this bound is tight. For $m\leq 2n-2$ the scheduler has a strategy that is guaranteed to make the game continue indefinitely and thus win. We also have some results on additional interesting questions. For example, if $m \ge 2n-1$ (so that the team can win), how quickly can they achieve victory?

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Universal Factor Graphs

The factor graph of an instance of a symmetric constraint satisfaction problem on n Boolean variables and m constraints (CSPs such as k-SAT, k-AND, k-LIN) is a bipartite graph describing which variables appear in which constraints. The factor graph describes the instance up to the polarity of the variables, and hence there are up to 2km instances of the CSP that share the same factor graph. It is well known that factor graphs with certain structural properties make the underlying CSP easier to either solve exactly (e.g., for tree structures) or approximately (e.g., for planar structures). We are interested in the following question: is there a factor graph for which if one can solve every instance of the CSP with this particular factor graph, then one can solve every instance of the CSP regardless of the factor graph (and similarly, for approximation)? We call such a factor graph universal. As one needs different factor graphs for different values of n and m, this gives rise to the notion of a family of universal factor graphs. We initiate a systematic study of universal factor graphs, and present some results for max-kSAT. Our work has connections with the notion of preprocessing as previously studied for closest codeword and closest lattice-vector problems, with proofs for the PCP theorem, and with tests for the long code. Many questions remain open.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Mechanism design with uncertain inputs (to err is human, to forgive divine)

We consider a task of scheduling with a common deadline on a single machine. Every player reports to a scheduler the length of his job and the scheduler needs to finish as many jobs as possible by the deadline. For this simple problem, there is a truthful mechanism that achieves maximum welfare in dominant strategies. The new aspect of our work is that in our setting players are uncertain about their own job lengths, and hence are incapable of providing truthful reports (in the strict sense of the word). For a probabilistic model for uncertainty our main results are as follows. 1) Even with relatively little uncertainty, no mechanism can guarantee a constant fraction of the maximum welfare. 2) To remedy this situation, we introduce a new measure of economic efficiency, based on a notion of a {\em fair share} of a player, and design mechanisms that are $Ω(1)$-fair. In addition to its intrinsic appeal, our notion of fairness implies good approximation of maximum welfare in several cases of interest. 3) In our mechanisms the machine is sometimes left idle even though there are jobs that want to use it. We show that this unfavorable aspect is unavoidable, unless one gives up other favorable aspects (e.g., give up $Ω(1)$-fairness). We also consider a qualitative approach to uncertainty as an alternative to the probabilistic quantitative model. In the qualitative approach we break away from solution concepts such as dominant strategies (they are no longer well defined), and instead suggest an axiomatic approach, which amounts to listing desirable properties for mechanisms. We provide a mechanism that satisfies these properties.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Min-Max Graph Partitioning and Small Set Expansion

We study graph partitioning problems from a min-max perspective, in which an input graph on n vertices should be partitioned into k parts, and the objective is to minimize the maximum number of edges leaving a single part. The two main versions we consider are where the k parts need to be of equal-size, and where they must separate a set of k given terminals. We consider a common generalization of these two problems, and design for it an $O(\sqrt{\log n\log k})$-approximation algorithm. This improves over an $O(\log^2 n)$ approximation for the second version, and roughly $O(k\log n)$ approximation for the first version that follows from other previous work. We also give an improved O(1)-approximation algorithm for graphs that exclude any fixed minor. Our algorithm uses a new procedure for solving the Small-Set Expansion problem. In this problem, we are given a graph G and the goal is to find a non-empty set $S\subseteq V$ of size $|S| \leq ρn$ with minimum edge-expansion. We give an $O(\sqrt{\log{n}\log{(1/ρ)}})$ bicriteria approximation algorithm for the general case of Small-Set Expansion, and O(1) approximation algorithm for graphs that exclude any fixed minor.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Oblivious Collaboration

Communication is a crucial ingredient in every kind of collaborative work. But what is the least possible amount of communication required for a given task? We formalize this question by introducing a new framework for distributed computation, called {\em oblivious protocols}. We investigate the power of this model by considering two concrete examples, the {\em musical chairs} task $MC(n,m)$ and the well-known {\em Renaming} problem. The $MC(n,m)$ game is played by $n$ players (processors) with $m$ chairs. Players can {\em occupy} chairs, and the game terminates as soon as each player occupies a unique chair. Thus we say that player $P$ is {\em in conflict} if some other player $Q$ is occupying the same chair, i.e., termination means there are no conflicts. By known results from distributed computing, if $m \le 2n-2$, no strategy of the players can guarantee termination. However, there is a protocol with $m = 2n-1$ chairs that always terminates. Here we consider an oblivious protocol where in every time step the only communication is this: an adversarial {\em scheduler} chooses an arbitrary nonempty set of players, and for each of them provides only one bit of information, specifying whether the player is currently in conflict or not. A player notified not to be in conflict halts and never changes its chair, whereas a player notified to be in conflict changes its chair according to its deterministic program. Remarkably, even with this minimal communication termination can be guaranteed with only $m=2n-1$ chairs. Likewise, we obtain an oblivious protocol for the Renaming problem whose name-space is small as that of the optimal nonoblivious distributed protocol. Other aspects suggest themselves, such as the efficiency (program length) of our protocols. We make substantial progress here as well, though many interesting questions remain open.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Recoverable Values for Independent Sets

The notion of {\em recoverable value} was advocated in work of Feige, Immorlica, Mirrokni and Nazerzadeh [Approx 2009] as a measure of quality for approximation algorithms. There this concept was applied to facility location problems. In the current work we apply a similar framework to the maximum independent set problem (MIS). We say that an approximation algorithm has {\em recoverable value} $ρ$, if for every graph it recovers an independent set of size at least $\max_I \sum_{v\in I} \min[1,ρ/(d(v) + 1)]$, where $d(v)$ is the degree of vertex $v$, and $I$ ranges over all independent sets in $G$. Hence, in a sense, from every vertex $v$ in the maximum independent set the algorithm recovers a value of at least $ρ/(d_v + 1)$ towards the solution. This quality measure is most effective in graphs in which the maximum independent set is composed of low degree vertices. It easily follows from known results that some simple algorithms for MIS ensure $ρ\ge 1$. We design a new randomized algorithm for MIS that ensures an expected recoverable value of at least $ρ\ge 7/3$. In addition, we show that approximating MIS in graphs with a given $k$-coloring within a ratio larger than $2/k$ is unique games hard. This rules out a natural approach for obtaining $ρ\ge 2$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Complete convergence of message passing algorithms for some satisfiability problems

In this paper we analyze the performance of Warning Propagation, a popular message passing algorithm. We show that for 3CNF formulas drawn from a certain distribution over random satisfiable 3CNF formulas, commonly referred to as the planted-assignment distribution, running Warning Propagation in the standard way (run message passing until convergence, simplify the formula according to the resulting assignment, and satisfy the remaining subformula, if necessary, using a simple "off the shelf" heuristic) results in a satisfying assignment when the clause-variable ratio is a sufficiently large constant.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Detecting High Log-Densities -- an O(n^1/4) Approximation for Densest k-Subgraph

In the Densest k-Subgraph problem, given a graph G and a parameter k, one needs to find a subgraph of G induced on k vertices that contains the largest number of edges. There is a significant gap between the best known upper and lower bounds for this problem. It is NP-hard, and does not have a PTAS unless NP has subexponential time algorithms. On the other hand, the current best known algorithm of Feige, Kortsarz and Peleg, gives an approximation ratio of n^(1/3-epsilon) for some specific epsilon > 0 (estimated at around 1/60). We present an algorithm that for every epsilon > 0 approximates the Densest k-Subgraph problem within a ratio of n^(1/4+epsilon) in time n^O(1/epsilon). In particular, our algorithm achieves an approximation ratio of O(n^1/4) in time n^O(log n). Our algorithm is inspired by studying an average-case version of the problem where the goal is to distinguish random graphs from graphs with planted dense subgraphs. The approximation ratio we achieve for the general case matches the distinguishing ratio we obtain for this planted problem. At a high level, our algorithms involve cleverly counting appropriately defined trees of constant size in G, and using these counts to identify the vertices of the dense subgraph. Our algorithm is based on the following principle. We say that a graph G(V,E) has log-density alpha if its average degree is Theta(|V|^alpha). The algorithmic core of our result is a family of algorithms that output k-subgraphs of nontrivial density whenever the log-density of the densest k-subgraph is larger than the log-density of the host graph.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Oblivious Algorithms for the Maximum Directed Cut Problem

This paper introduces a special family of randomized algorithms for Max DICUT that we call oblivious algorithms. Let the bias of a vertex be the ratio between the total weight of its outgoing edges and the total weight of all its edges. An oblivious algorithm selects at random in which side of the cut to place a vertex v, with probability that only depends on the bias of v, independently of other vertices. The reader may observe that the algorithm that ignores the bias and chooses each side with probability 1/2 has an approximation ratio of 1/4, whereas no oblivious algorithm can have an approximation ratio better than 1/2 (with an even directed cycle serving as a negative example). We attempt to characterize the best approximation ratio achievable by oblivious algorithms, and present results that are nearly tight. The paper also discusses natural extensions of the notion of oblivious algorithms, and extensions to the more general problem of Max 2-AND.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access