BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Daniel Reichman

Daniel Reichman contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Discrete MathematicsData Structures and Algorithmsmath.COComputational ComplexityMachine LearningNeural and Evolutionary Computing

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

The Computational Complexity of Counting Linear Regions in ReLU Neural Networks

An established measure of the expressive power of a given ReLU neural network is the number of linear regions into which it partitions the input space. There exist many different, non-equivalent definitions of what a linear region actually is. We systematically assess which papers use which definitions and discuss how they relate to each other. We then analyze the computational complexity of counting the number of such regions for the various definitions. Generally, this turns out to be an intractable problem. We prove NP- and #P-hardness results already for networks with one hidden layer and strong hardness of approximation results for two or more hidden layers. Finally, on the algorithmic side, we demonstrate that counting linear regions can at least be achieved in polynomial space for some common definitions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

The Learning and Communication Complexity of Subsequence Containment

We consider the learning and communication complexity of subsequence containment. In the learning problem, we seek to learn a classifier that positively labels a binary string $x$ if it contains a fixed binary string $y$ as a subsequence. In the communication problem, $x$ and $y$ are partitioned between two players, Alice and Bob, who wish to determine if $x$ contains $y$ as a subsequence using a minimal amount of communication. We devise asymptotically tight bounds for the sample complexity (VC dimension) of the learning problem and the communication complexity of the communication problem. Our results illustrate that the sample complexity of our learning problem can be considerably larger when the subsequence occurs in non-contiguous locations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Local treewidth of random and noisy graphs with applications to stopping contagion in networks

We study the notion of local treewidth in sparse random graphs: the maximum treewidth over all $k$-vertex subgraphs of an $n$-vertex graph. When $k$ is not too large, we give nearly tight bounds for this local treewidth parameter; we also derive tight bounds for the local treewidth of noisy trees, trees where every non-edge is added independently with small probability. We apply our upper bounds on the local treewidth to obtain fixed parameter tractable algorithms (on random graphs and noisy trees) for edge-removal problems centered around containing a contagious process evolving over a network. In these problems, our main parameter of study is $k$, the number of initially ``infected'' vertices in the network. For the random graph models we consider and a certain range of parameters the running time of our algorithms on $n$-vertex graphs is $2^{o(k)}\textrm{poly}(n)$, improving upon the $2^{Ω(k)}\textrm{poly}(n)$ performance of the best-known algorithms designed for worst-case instances of these edge deletion problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Influence is a Matter of Degree: New Algorithms for Activation Problems

We consider the target set selection problem. In this problem, a vertex is active either if it belongs to a set of initially activated vertices or if at some point it has at least $k$ active neighbors ($k$ is identical for all vertices of the graph). Our goal is to find a set of minimum size whose activation will result with the entire graph being activated. Call such a set \emph{contagious}. We prove that if $G=(V,E)$ is an undirected graph, the size of a contagious set is bounded by $\sum_{v\in V}{\min \{1,\frac{k}{d(v)+1}\}}$ (where $d(v)$ is the degree of $v$). We present a simple and efficient algorithm that finds a contagious set that is not larger than the aforementioned bound and discuss algorithmic applications of this algorithm to finding contagious sets in dense graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access