Paper detail

Random walks with the minimum degree local rule have $O(n^2)$ cover time

For a simple (unbiased) random walk on a connected graph with $n$ vertices, the cover time (the expected number of steps it takes to visit all vertices) is at most $O(n^3)$. We consider locally biased random walks, in which the probability of traversing an edge depends on the degrees of its endpoints. We confirm a conjecture of Abdullah, Cooper and Draief [2015] that the min-degree local bias rule ensures a cover time of $O(n^2)$. For this we formulate and prove the following lemma about spanning trees. Let $R(e)$ denote for edge $e$ the minimum degree among its two endpoints. We say that a weight function $W$ for the edges is feasible if it is nonnegative, dominated by $R$ (for every edge $W(e) \le R(e)$) and the sum over all edges of the ratios $W(e)/R(e)$ equals $n-1$. For example, in trees $W(e) = R(e)$, and in regular graphs the sum of edge weights is $d(n-1)$. {\bf Lemma:} for every feasible $W$, the minimum weight spanning tree has total weight $O(n)$. For regular graphs, a similar lemma was proved by Kahn, Linial, Nisan and Saks [1989].

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.