BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Urban Larsson

Urban Larsson contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.CODiscrete MathematicsComputer Science and Game Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Impartial games with entailing moves

Combinatorial Game Theory has also been called `additive game theory', whenever the analysis involves sums of independent game components. Such {\em disjunctive sums} invoke comparison between games, which allows abstract values to be assigned to them. However, there are rulesets with {\em entailing moves} that break the alternating play axiom and/or restrict the other player's options within the disjunctive sum components. These situations are exemplified in the literature by a ruleset such as {\sc nimstring}, a normal play variation of the classical children's game {\sc dots \& boxes}, and {\sc top~entails}, an elegant ruleset introduced in the classical work Winning Ways, by Berlekamp Conway and Guy. Such rulesets fall outside the scope of the established normal play theory. Here, we axiomatize normal play via two new terminating games, $\infty$ (Left wins) and $\overline\infty$ (Right wins), and a more general theory is achieved. We define {\em affine impartial}, which extends classical impartial games, and we analyze their algebra by extending the established Sprague-Grundy theory, with an accompanying minimum excluded rule. Solutions of {\sc nimstring} and {\sc top~entails} are given to illustrate the theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Atomic weights and the combinatorial game of Bipass

We define an all-small ruleset, Bipass, within the framework of normal-play combinatorial games. A game is played on finite strips of black and white stones. Stones of different colors are swapped provided they do not bypass one of their own kind. We find a surjective function from the strips to integer atomic weights (Berlekamp, Conway and Guy 1982) that measures the number of units in all-small games. This result provides explicit winning strategies for many games, and in cases where it does not, it gives narrow bounds for the canonical form game values. We prove that the game value *2 does not appear as a disjunctive sum of Bipass. Moreover, we find game values for some parametrized families of games, including an infinite number of strips of value *.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Cumulative subtraction games

We study zero-sum games, a variant of the classical combinatorial Subtraction games (studied for example in the monumental work "Winning Ways", by Berlekamp, Conway and Guy), called Cumulative Subtraction (CS). Two players alternate in moving, and get points for taking pebbles out of a joint pile. We prove that the outcome in optimal play (game value) of a CS with a finite number of possible actions is eventually periodic, with period $2s$, where $s$ is the size of the largest available action. This settles a conjecture by Stewart in his Ph.D. thesis (2011). Specifically, we find a quadratic bound, in the size of $s$, on when the outcome function must have become periodic. In case of two possible actions, we give an explicit description of optimal play. We generalize the periodicity result to games with a so-called reward function, where at each stage of game, the change of `score' does not necessarily equal the number of pebbles you collect.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Discrete Richman-bidding Scoring Games

We study zero-sum (combinatorial) games, within the framework of so-called Richman auctions (Lazarus et al. 1996) namely, we modify the alternating play scoring ruleset Cumulative Subtraction (CS) (Cohensius et al. 2019), to a discrete bidding scheme (similar to Develin and Payne 2010). Players bid to move and the player with the highest bid wins the move, and hands over the winning bidding amount to the other player. The new game is dubbed Bidding Cumulative Subtraction (BCS). In so-called unitary games, players remove exactly one item out of a single heap of identical items, until the heap is empty, and their actions contribute to a common score, which increases or decreases by one unit depending on whether the maximizing player won the turn or not. We show that there is a unique bidding equilibrium for a much larger class of games, that generalize standard scoring play in the literature. We prove that for all sufficiently large heap sizes, the equilibrium outcomes of unitary BCS are eventually periodic, with period 2, and we show that the periodicity appears at the latest for heaps of sizes quadratic in the total budget.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

A Generalized Diagonal Wythoff Nim

In this paper we study a family of 2-pile Take Away games, that we denote by Generalized Diagonal Wythoff Nim (GDWN). The story begins with 2-pile Nim whose sets of options and $P$-positions are $\{\{0,t\}\mid t\in \N\}$ and $\{(t,t)\mid t\in \M \}$ respectively. If we to 2-pile Nim adjoin the main-\emph{diagonal} $\{(t,t)\mid t\in \N\}$ as options, the new game is Wythoff Nim. It is well-known that the $P$-positions of this game lie on two &#39;beams&#39; originating at the origin with slopes $Φ= \frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}>1$ and $\frac{1}Φ < 1$. Hence one may think of this as if, in the process of going from Nim to Wythoff Nim, the set of $P$-positions has \emph{split} and landed some distance off the main diagonal. This geometrical observation has motivated us to ask the following intuitive question. Does this splitting of the set of $P$-positions continue in some meaningful way if we, to the game of Wythoff Nim, adjoin some new \emph{generalized diagonal} move, that is a move of the form $\{pt, qt\}$, where $0 < p < q$ are fixed positive integers and $t > 0$? Does the answer perhaps depend on the specific values of $p$ and $q$? We state three conjectures of which the weakest form is: $\lim_{t\in \N}\frac{b_t}{a_t}$ exists, and equals $Φ$, if and only if $(p, q)$ is a certain \emph{non-splitting pair}, and where $\{\{a_t, b_t\}\}$ represents the set of $P$-positions of the new game. Then we prove this conjecture for the special case $(p,q) = (1,2)$ (a \emph{splitting pair}). We prove the other direction whenever $q / p < Φ$. In the Appendix, a variety of experimental data is included, aiming to point out some directions for future work on GDWN games.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Invariant and dual subtraction games resolving the Duchê-Rigo conjecture

We prove a recent conjecture of Duchêne and Rigo, stating that every complementary pair of homogeneous Beatty sequences represents the solution to an \emph{invariant} impartial game. Here invariance means that each available move in a game can be played anywhere inside the game-board. In fact, we establish such a result for a wider class of pairs of complementary sequences, and in the process generalize the notion of a \emph{subtraction game}. Given a pair of complementary sequences $(a_n)$ and $(b_n)$ of positive integers, we define a game $G$ by setting $\{\{a_n, b_n\}\}$ as invariant moves. We then introduce the invariant game $G^\star $, whose moves are all non-zero $P$-positions of $G$. Provided the set of non-zero $P$-positions of $G^\star$ equals $\{\{a_n,b_n\}\}$, this \emph{is} the desired invariant game. We give sufficient conditions on the initial pair of sequences for this &#39;duality&#39; to hold.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Restrictions of $m$-Wythoff Nim and $p$-complementary Beatty Sequences

Fix a positive integer $m$. The game of \emph{$m$-Wythoff Nim} (A.S. Fraenkel, 1982) is a well-known extension of \emph{Wythoff Nim}, a.k.a &#39;Corner the Queen&#39;. Its set of $P$-positions may be represented by a pair of increasing sequences of non-negative integers. It is well-known that these sequences are so-called \emph{complementary homogeneous} \emph{Beatty sequences}, that is they satisfy Beatty&#39;s theorem. For a positive integer $p$, we generalize the solution of $m$-Wythoff Nim to a pair of \emph{$p$-complementary}---each positive integer occurs exactly $p$ times---homogeneous Beatty sequences $a = (a_n)_{n\in \M}$ and $b = (b_n)_{n\in \M}$, which, for all $n$, satisfies $b_n - a_n = mn$. By the latter property, we show that $a$ and $b$ are unique among \emph{all} pairs of non-decreasing $p$-complementary sequences. We prove that such pairs can be partitioned into $p$ pairs of complementary Beatty sequences. Our main results are that $\{\{a_n,b_n\}\mid n\in \M\}$ represents the solution to three new &#39;$p$-restrictions&#39; of $m$-Wythoff Nim---of which one has a \emph{blocking maneuver} on the \emph{rook-type} options. C. Kimberling has shown that the solution of Wythoff Nim satisfies the \emph{complementary equation} $x_{x_n}=y_n - 1$. We generalize this formula to a certain &#39;$p$-complementary equation&#39; satisfied by our pair $a$ and $b$. We also show that one may obtain our new pair of sequences by three so-called \emph{Minimal EXclusive} algorithms. We conclude with an Appendix by Aviezri Fraenkel.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access