Paper detail

A Cellular Automaton for Blocking Queen Games

We show that the winning positions of a certain type of two-player game form interesting patterns which often defy analysis, yet can be computed by a cellular automaton. The game, known as {\em Blocking Wythoff Nim}, consists of moving a queen as in chess, but always towards (0,0), and it may not be moved to any of $k-1$ temporarily "blocked" positions specified on the previous turn by the other player. The game ends when a player wins by blocking all possible moves of the other player. The value of $k$ is a parameter that defines the game, and the pattern of winning positions can be very sensitive to $k$. As $k$ becomes large, parts of the pattern of winning positions converge to recurring chaotic patterns that are independent of $k$. The patterns for large $k$ display an unprecedented amount of self-organization at many scales, and here we attempt to describe the self-organized structure that appears.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.