BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Richard J. Nowakowski

Richard J. Nowakowski contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.CODiscrete MathematicsComputer Science and Game Theorymath.HO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Æquitas: Two-Player Counterfeit Coin Games

We discuss games involving a counterfeit coin. Given one counterfeit coin among a number of otherwise identical coins, two players with full knowledge of the fake coin take turns weighing coins on a two-pan scale, under the condition that on every turn they reveal some information to an Observer with limited prior knowledge about the coins. We study several games depending on the types of the counterfeit coin, the end-game condition, and the availability of extra genuine coins. We present the winning positions and the Grundy numbers for these games.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Cheating Robot Games: A model for insider information

Combinatorial games are two-player games of pure strategy where the players, usually called Left and Right, move alternately. In this paper, we introduce Cheating Robot games. These arise from simultaneous-play combinatorial games where one player has insider information ('cheats'). Play occurs in rounds. At the beginning of a round, both players know the moves that are available to them. Left chooses a move. Knowing Left's move, Right then chooses a move. Right's move is not constrained by Left's choice. The round is not completed until both players have made a choice. A game is finished only when one or both players do not have a move at the beginning of a round. Right choosing a move, knowing Left's, makes the games deterministic, distinguishing them from simultaneous games. Also, the ending condition distinguishes this class of games from combinatorial games, since the outcomes are now Left-win, Right-win and draw. The basic theory and properties are developed, including showing that there is an equivalence relation and partial order on the games. Whilst there are no inverses in the class of all games, we show that there is a sub-class, simple hot games, in which the integers have inverses. In this sub-class, the optimal strategies are obtained by the solutions to a minimum-weight matching problem on a graph whose number of vertices equals the number of summands in the disjunctive sum.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

A Note on Numbers

When are all positions of a game numbers? We show that two properties are necessary and sufficient. These properties are consequences of that, in a number, it is not an advantage to be the first player. One of these properties implies the other. However, checking for one or the other, rather than just one, can often be accomplished by only looking at the positions on the `board'. If the stronger property holds for all positions, then the values are integers.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Impartial games with entailing moves

Combinatorial Game Theory has also been called `additive game theory', whenever the analysis involves sums of independent game components. Such {\em disjunctive sums} invoke comparison between games, which allows abstract values to be assigned to them. However, there are rulesets with {\em entailing moves} that break the alternating play axiom and/or restrict the other player's options within the disjunctive sum components. These situations are exemplified in the literature by a ruleset such as {\sc nimstring}, a normal play variation of the classical children's game {\sc dots \& boxes}, and {\sc top~entails}, an elegant ruleset introduced in the classical work Winning Ways, by Berlekamp Conway and Guy. Such rulesets fall outside the scope of the established normal play theory. Here, we axiomatize normal play via two new terminating games, $\infty$ (Left wins) and $\overline\infty$ (Right wins), and a more general theory is achieved. We define {\em affine impartial}, which extends classical impartial games, and we analyze their algebra by extending the established Sprague-Grundy theory, with an accompanying minimum excluded rule. Solutions of {\sc nimstring} and {\sc top~entails} are given to illustrate the theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Partizan Subtraction Games

Partizan subtraction games are combinatorial games where two players, say Left and Right, alternately remove a number n of tokens from a heap of tokens, with $n \in S_L$ (resp. $n \in S_R$) when it is Left's (resp. Right's) turn. The first player unable to move loses. These games were introduced by Fraenkel and Kotzig in 1987, where they introduced the notion of dominance, i.e. an asymptotic behavior of the outcome sequence where Left always wins if the heap is sufficiently large. In the current paper, we investigate the other kinds of behaviors for the outcome sequence. In addition to dominance, three other disjoint behaviors are defined, namely weak dominance, fairness and ultimate impartiality. We consider the problem of computing this behavior with respect to $S_L$ and $S_R$, which is connected to the well-known Frobenius coin problem. General results are given, together with arithmetic and geometric characterizations when the sets $S_L$ and $S_R$ have size at most 2.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

The game of Flipping Coins

We consider Flipping Coins, a partizan version of the impartial game Turning Turtles, played on lines of coins. We show the values of this game are numbers, and these are found by first applying a reduction, then decomposing the position into an iterated ordinal sum. This is unusual since moves in the middle of the line do not eliminate the rest of the line. Moreover, when $G$ is decomposed into lines $H$ and $K$, then $G=(H:K^R)$. This is in contrast to Hackenbush Strings where $G= (H:K)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Atomic weights and the combinatorial game of Bipass

We define an all-small ruleset, Bipass, within the framework of normal-play combinatorial games. A game is played on finite strips of black and white stones. Stones of different colors are swapped provided they do not bypass one of their own kind. We find a surjective function from the strips to integer atomic weights (Berlekamp, Conway and Guy 1982) that measures the number of units in all-small games. This result provides explicit winning strategies for many games, and in cases where it does not, it gives narrow bounds for the canonical form game values. We prove that the game value *2 does not appear as a disjunctive sum of Bipass. Moreover, we find game values for some parametrized families of games, including an infinite number of strips of value *.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access