BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Johan Wästlund

Johan Wästlund contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.COmath.PRComputer Science and Game TheoryComputational ComplexityData Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete MathematicsLogic in Computer Sciencemath-phmath.MPmath.OC

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
10topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Faulty picture-hanging improved

A picture-hanging puzzle is the task of hanging a framed picture with a wire around a set of nails in such a way that it can remain hanging on certain specified sets of nails, but will fall if any more are removed. The classical brain teaser asks us to hang a picture on two nails in such a way that it falls when any one is detached. Demaine et al (2012) proved that all reasonable puzzles of this kind are solvable, and that for the $k$-out-of-$n$ problem, the size of a solution can be bounded by a polynomial in $n$. We give simplified proofs of these facts, for the latter leading to a reasonable exponent in the polynomial bound.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Games on Random Boards

We consider the following two-player game on a graph. A token is located at a vertex, and the players take turns to move it along an edge to a vertex that has not been visited before. A player who cannot move loses. We analyze outcomes with optimal play on percolation clusters of Euclidean lattices. On Z^2 with two different percolation parameters for odd and even sites, we prove that the game has no draws provided closed sites of one parity are sufficiently rare compared with those of the other parity (thus favoring one player). We prove this also for certain d-dimensional lattices with d>=3. It is an open question whether draws can occur when the two parameters are equal. On a finite ball of Z^2, with only odd sites closed but with the external boundary consisting of even sites, we identify up to logarithmic factors a critical window for the trade-off between the size of the ball and the percolation parameter. Outside this window, one or other player has a decisive advantage. Our analysis of the game is intimately tied to the effect of boundary conditions on maximum-cardinality matchings.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

From heaps of matches to the limits of computability

We study so-called invariant games played with a fixed number $d$ of heaps of matches. A game is described by a finite list $\mathcal{M}$ of integer vectors of length $d$ specifying the legal moves. A move consists in changing the current game-state by adding one of the vectors in $\mathcal{M}$, provided all elements of the resulting vector are nonnegative. For instance, in a two-heap game, the vector $(1,-2)$ would mean adding one match to the first heap and removing two matches from the second heap. If $(1,-2) \in \mathcal{M}$, such a move would be permitted provided there are at least two matches in the second heap. Two players take turns, and a player unable to make a move loses. We show that these games embrace computational universality, and that therefore a number of basic questions about them are algorithmically undecidable. In particular, we prove that there is no algorithm that takes two games $\mathcal{M}$ and $\mathcal{M}'$ (with the same number of heaps) as input, and determines whether or not they are equivalent in the sense that every starting-position which is a first player win in one of the games is a first player win in the other.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Maharaja Nim, Wythoff's Queen meets the Knight

New combinatorial games are introduced, of which the most pertinent is Maharaja Nim. The rules extend those of the well-known impartial game of Wythoff Nim in which two players take turn in moving a single Queen of Chess on a large board, attempting to be the first to put her in the lower left corner. Here, in addition to the classical rules a player may also move the Queen as the Knight of Chess moves. We prove that the second player's winning positions of Maharaja Nim are close to the ones of Wythoff Nim, namely they are within a bounded distance to the lines with slope $\frac{\sqrt{5}+1}{2}$ and $\frac{\sqrt{5}-1}{2}$ respectively. For a close relative to Maharaja Nim, where the Knight's jumps are of the form $(2,3)$ and $(3,2)$ (rather than $(1,2)$ and $(2,1)$), we also demonstrate polynomial time complexity to the decision problem of the outcome of a given position.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Rigorous computer analysis of the Chow-Robbins game

Flip a coin repeatedly, and stop whenever you want. Your payoff is the proportion of heads, and you wish to maximize this payoff in expectation. This so-called Chow-Robbins game is amenable to computer analysis, but while simple-minded number crunching can show that it is best to continue in a given position, establishing rigorously that stopping is optimal seems at first sight to require "backward induction from infinity". We establish a simple upper bound on the expected payoff in a given position, allowing efficient and rigorous computer analysis of positions early in the game. In particular we confirm that with 5 heads and 3 tails, stopping is optimal.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

The Phase Transition for Dyadic Tilings

A dyadic tile of order n is any rectangle obtained from the unit square by n successive bisections by horizontal or vertical cuts. Let each dyadic tile of order n be available with probability p, independently of the others. We prove that for p sufficiently close to 1, there exists a set of pairwise disjoint available tiles whose union is the unit square, with probability tending to 1 as n->infinity, as conjectured by Joel Spencer in 1999. In particular we prove that if p=7/8, such a tiling exists with probability at least 1-(3/4)^n. The proof involves a surprisingly delicate counting argument for sets of unavailable tiles that prevent tiling.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

When only the last one will do

An unknown positive number of items arrive at independent uniformly distributed times in the interval [0,1] to a selector, whose task is to pick online the last one. We show that under the assumption of an adversary determining the number of items, there exists a game-theoretical equilibrium, in other words the selector and the adversary both possess optimal strategies. The probability of success of the selector with the optimal strategy is estimated numerically to 0.352917000207196.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Partially ordered secretaries

The elements of a finite nonempty partially ordered set are exposed at independent uniform times in $[0,1]$ to a selector who, at any given time, can see the structure of the induced partial order on the exposed elements. The selector's task is to choose online a maximal element. This generalizes the classical linear order secretary problem, for which it is known that the selector can succeed with probability $1/e$ and that this is best possible. We describe a strategy for the general problem that achieves success probability $1/e$ for an arbitrary partial order.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access