A Generalized Diagonal Wythoff Nim

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Abstract

In this paper we study a family of 2-pile Take Away games, that we denote by Generalized Diagonal Wythoff Nim (GDWN). The story begins with 2-pile Nim whose sets of options and PP-positions are {{0,t}∣t∈N}\{\{0,t\}\mid t\in \N\} and $\{(t,t)\mid t\in \M \}$ respectively. If we to 2-pile Nim adjoin the main-\emph{diagonal} {(t,t)∣t∈N}\{(t,t)\mid t\in \N\} as options, the new game is Wythoff Nim. It is well-known that the PP-positions of this game lie on two 'beams' originating at the origin with slopes Φ=1+52>1Φ= \frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}>1 and 1Φ<1\frac{1}Φ < 1. Hence one may think of this as if, in the process of going from Nim to Wythoff Nim, the set of PP-positions has \emph{split} and landed some distance off the main diagonal. This geometrical observation has motivated us to ask the following intuitive question. Does this splitting of the set of PP-positions continue in some meaningful way if we, to the game of Wythoff Nim, adjoin some new \emph{generalized diagonal} move, that is a move of the form {pt,qt}\{pt, qt\}, where 0<p<q0 < p < q are fixed positive integers and t>0t > 0? Does the answer perhaps depend on the specific values of pp and qq? We state three conjectures of which the weakest form is: lim⁡t∈Nbtat\lim_{t\in \N}\frac{b_t}{a_t} exists, and equals ΦΦ, if and only if (p,q)(p, q) is a certain \emph{non-splitting pair}, and where {{at,bt}}\{\{a_t, b_t\}\} represents the set of PP-positions of the new game. Then we prove this conjecture for the special case (p,q)=(1,2)(p,q) = (1,2) (a \emph{splitting pair}). We prove the other direction whenever q/p<Φq / p < Φ. In the Appendix, a variety of experimental data is included, aiming to point out some directions for future work on GDWN games.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.