Source author record

Ivo M. Michailov

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

8works
5topics
4close collaborators

Published work

8 publications

preprint2016arXiv

Bogomolov multipliers for some pp-groups of nilpotency class 2

The Bogomolov multiplier B0(G)B_0(G) of a finite group GG is defined as the subgroup of the Schur multiplier consisting of the cohomology classes vanishing after restriction to all abelian subgroups of GG. The triviality of the Bogomolov multiplier is an obstruction to Noether's problem. We show that if GG is a central product of G1G_1 and G2G_2, regarding Ki≤Z(Gi),i=1,2K_i\leq Z(G_i), i=1,2, and θ:G1→G2θ:G_1\to G_2 is a group homomorphism such that its restriction θ∣K1:K1→K2θ\vert_{K_1}:K_1\to K_2 is an isomorphism, then the triviality of B0(G1/K1),B0(G1)B_0(G_1/K_1), B_0(G_1) and B0(G2)B_0(G_2) implies the triviality of B0(G)B_0(G). We give a positive answer to Noether's problem for all 22-generator pp-groups of nilpotency class 22, and for one series of 44-generator pp-groups of nilpotency class 22 (with the usual requirement for the roots of unity).

preprint2013arXiv

Noether's problem for pp-groups with an abelian subgroup of index pp

Let KK be a field and GG be a finite group. Let GG act on the rational function field K(x(g):g∈G)K(x(g):g\in G) by KK-automorphisms defined by g⋅x(h)=x(gh)g\cdot x(h)=x(gh) for any g,h∈Gg,h\in G. Denote by K(G)K(G) the fixed field K(x(g):g∈G)GK(x(g):g\in G)^G. Noether's problem then asks whether K(G)K(G) is rational over KK. Let pp be an odd prime and let GG be a pp-group of exponent pep^e. Assume also that {\rm (i)} char K=p>0K = p>0, or {\rm (ii)} char K≠pK \ne p and KK contains a primitive pep^e-th root of unity. In this paper we prove that K(G)K(G) is rational over KK for the following two types of groups: {\rm (1)} GG is a finite pp-group with an abelian normal subgroup HH of index pp, such that HH is a direct product of normal subgroups of GG of the type Cpb×(Cp)cC_{p^b}\times (C_p)^c for some b,c:1≤b,0≤cb,c:1\leq b,0\leq c; {\rm (2)} GG is any group of order p5p^5 from the isoclinic families with numbers 1,2,3,4,81,2,3,4,8 and 9.

preprint2013arXiv

Noether's problem for abelian extensions of cyclic pp-groups

Let KK be a field and GG be a finite group. Let GG act on the rational function field K(x(g):g∈G)K(x(g):g\in G) by KK automorphisms defined by g⋅x(h)=x(gh)g\cdot x(h)=x(gh) for any g,h∈Gg,h\in G. Denote by K(G)K(G) the fixed field K(x(g):g∈G)GK(x(g):g\in G)^G. Noether's problem then asks whether K(G)K(G) is rational (i.e., purely transcendental) over KK. The first main result of this article is that K(G)K(G) is rational over KK for a certain class of pp-groups having an abelian subgoup of index pp. The second main result is that K(G)K(G) is rational over KK for any group of order p5p^5 or p6p^6 (pp is an odd prime) having an abelian normal subgroup such that its quotient group is cyclic. (In both theorems we assume that if charK≠pchar K\ne p then KK contains a primitive pep^e-th root of unity, where pep^e is the exponent of GG.)

preprint2013arXiv

Noether's problem for abelian extensions of cyclic pp-groups II

Let KK be a field and GG be a finite group. Let GG act on the rational function field K(x(g):g∈G)K(x(g):g\in G) by KK automorphisms defined by g⋅x(h)=x(gh)g\cdot x(h)=x(gh) for any g,h∈Gg,h\in G. Denote by K(G)K(G) the fixed field K(x(g):g∈G)GK(x(g):g\in G)^G. Noether's problem then asks whether K(G)K(G) is rational (i.e., purely transcendental) over KK. Let pp be any prime and let GG be a pp-group of exponent pep^e. Assume also that {\rm (i)} char K=p>0K = p>0, or {\rm (ii)} char K≠pK \ne p and KK contains a primitive pep^e-th root of unity. In this paper we prove that if GG is any pp-group of nilpotency class 2, which has the ABC (Abelian-By-Cyclic) property, then K(G)K(G) is rational over KK. We also prove the rationality of K(G)K(G) over KK for two 3-generator pp-groups GG of arbitrary nilpotency class.

preprint2012arXiv

On realizability of pp-groups as Galois groups

In this article we survey and examine the realizability of pp-groups as Galois groups over arbitrary fields. In particular we consider various cohomological criteria that lead to necessary and sufficient conditions for the realizability of such a group as a Galois group, the embedding problem (i.e., realizability over a given subextension), descriptions of such extensions, automatic realizations among pp-groups, and related topics.

preprint2011arXiv

Noether's problem for central extensions of metacyclic pp-groups

Let KK be a field and GG be a finite group. Let GG act on the rational function field K(x(g):g∈G)K(x(g):g\in G) by KK automorphisms defined by g⋅x(h)=x(gh)g\cdot x(h)=x(gh) for any g,h∈Gg,h\in G. Denote by K(G)K(G) the fixed field K(x(g):g∈G)GK(x(g):g\in G)^G. Noether's problem then asks whether K(G)K(G) is rational over KK. In [M. Kang, Noether's problem for metacyclic pp-groups, Adv. Math. 203(2005), 554-567], Kang proves the rationality of K(G)K(G) over KK if GG is any metacyclic pp-group and KK is any field containing enough roots of unity. In this paper, we give a positive answer to the Noether's problem for all central group extensions of the general metacyclic pp-group, provided that KK is infinite and it contains sufficient roots of unity.

preprint2011arXiv

Noether's problem for some 2-groups

Let GG be a finite group and kk be a field. Let GG act on the rational function field k(xg:g∈G)k(x_g:g\in G) by kk-automorphisms defined by g⋅xh=xghg\cdot x_h=x_{gh} for any g,h∈Gg,h\in G. Noether's problem asks whether the fixed field k(G)=k(xg:g∈G)Gk(G)=k(x_g:g\in G)^G is rational (i.e. purely transcendental) over kk. We will prove that, if GG is a group of order 2n2^n (n≥4n\ge 4) and of exponent 2e2^e such that (i) e≥n−2e\ge n-2 and (ii) ζ2e−1∈kζ_{2^{e-1}} \in k, then k(G)k(G) is kk-rational.13A50,14E08,14M20,12F12

preprint2011arXiv

Noether's problem for the groups with a cyclic subgroup of index 4

Let GG be a finite group and kk be a field. Let GG act on the rational function field k(xg:g∈G)k(x_g:g\in G) by kk-automorphisms defined by g⋅xh=xghg\cdot x_h=x_{gh} for any g,h∈Gg,h\in G. Noether's problem asks whether the fixed field k(G)=k(xg:g∈G)Gk(G)=k(x_g:g\in G)^G is rational (i.e. purely transcendental) over kk. Theorem 1. If GG is a group of order 2n2^n (n≥4n\ge 4) and of exponent 2e2^e such that (i) e≥n−2e\ge n-2 and (ii) ζ2e−1∈kζ_{2^{e-1}} \in k, then k(G)k(G) is kk-rational. Theorem 2. Let GG be a group of order 4n4n where nn is any positive integer (it is unnecessary to assume that nn is a power of 2). Assume that {\rm (i)} $\fn{char}k \ne 2$, ζn∈kζ_n \in k, and {\rm (ii)} GG contains an element of order nn. Then k(G)k(G) is rational over kk, except for the case n=2mn=2m and G≃Cm⋊C8G \simeq C_m \rtimes C_8 where mm is an odd integer and the center of GG is of even order (note that CmC_m is normal in Cm⋊C8C_m \rtimes C_8) ; for the exceptional case, k(G)k(G) is rational over kk if and only if at least one of −1,2,−2-1, 2, -2 belongs to (k×)2(k^{\times})^2.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.