Paper detail

Noether's problem for abelian extensions of cyclic $p$-groups

Let $K$ be a field and $G$ be a finite group. Let $G$ act on the rational function field $K(x(g):g\in G)$ by $K$ automorphisms defined by $g\cdot x(h)=x(gh)$ for any $g,h\in G$. Denote by $K(G)$ the fixed field $K(x(g):g\in G)^G$. Noether's problem then asks whether $K(G)$ is rational (i.e., purely transcendental) over $K$. The first main result of this article is that $K(G)$ is rational over $K$ for a certain class of $p$-groups having an abelian subgoup of index $p$. The second main result is that $K(G)$ is rational over $K$ for any group of order $p^5$ or $p^6$ ($p$ is an odd prime) having an abelian normal subgroup such that its quotient group is cyclic. (In both theorems we assume that if $char K\ne p$ then $K$ contains a primitive $p^e$-th root of unity, where $p^e$ is the exponent of $G$.)

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.