Researcher profile

Federico Glaudo

Federico Glaudo contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

On The Determination of Sets By Their Subset Sums

Let $A$ be a multiset with elements in an abelian group. Let $FS(A)$ be the multiset containing the $2^{|A|}$ sums of all subsets of $A$. We study the reconstruction problem ``Given $FS(A)$, is it possible to identify $A$?'', and we give a satisfactory answer for all abelian groups. We prove that, up to identifying multisets through a natural equivalence relation, the function $A \mapsto FS(A)$ is injective (and thus the reconstruction problem is solvable) if and only if every order $n$ of a torsion element of the abelian group satisfies a certain number-theoretical property linked to the multiplicative group $(\mathbb{Z} / n\mathbb{Z})^*$. The core of the proof relies on a delicate study of the structure of cyclotomic units. Moreover, as a tool, we develop an inversion formula for a novel discrete Radon transform on finite abelian groups that might be of independent interest.

preprint2022arXiv

Minkowski inequality for nearly spherical domains

We investigate the validity and the stability of various Minkowski-like inequalities for $C^1$-perturbations of the ball. Let $K\subseteq\mathbb R^n$ be a domain (possibly not convex and not mean-convex) which is $C^1$-close to a ball. We prove the sharp geometric inequality $$ \left(\int_{\partial K} \lVert II\rVert_1 d\mathscr H^{n-1}\right)^{\frac1{n-2}} \ge C_1(n)Per(K)^{\frac1{n-1}} , $$ where $C_1(n)$ is the constant that yields the equality when $K=B_1$ (and $\lVert II\rVert_1$ is the sum of the absolute values of the eigenvalues of the second fundamental form $II$ of $\partial K$). Moreover, for any $δ>0$, if $K$ is sufficiently $C^1$-close to a ball, we show the almost sharp Minkowski inequality $$ \left(\int_{\partial K} H^+ d\mathscr H^{n-1}\right)^{\frac1{n-2}} \ge (C_1(n)-δ)Per(K)^{\frac1{n-1}} . $$ If $K$ is axially symmetric, we prove the Minkowski inequality with the sharp constant (i.e., $δ=0$). We establish also the sharp quantitative stability (in the family of $C^1$-perturbations of the ball) of the volumetric Minkowski inequality $$ \left(\int_{\partial K} H^+ d\mathscr H^{n-1}\right)^{\frac1{n-2}} \ge C_2(n)|K|^{\frac1n} , $$ where $C_2(n)$ is the constant that yields the equality when $K=B_1$. Finally, we show, by constructing a counterexample, that the mentioned inequalities are false (even for domains $C^1$-close to the ball) if one replaces $H^+$ with $H$.

preprint2020arXiv

Sharp quantitative stability for isoperimetric inequalities with homogeneous weights

We prove the sharp quantitative stability for a wide class of weighted isoperimetric inequalities. More precisely, we consider isoperimetric inequalities in convex cones with homogeneous weights. Inspired by the proof of such isoperimetric inequalities through the ABP method, we construct a new convex coupling (i.e., a map that is the gradient of a convex function) between a generic set $E$ and the minimizer of the inequality (as in Gromov's proof of the isoperimetric inequality). Even if this map does not come from optimal transport, and even if there is a weight in the inequality, we adapt the methods of Figalli-Maggi-Pratelli and prove that if $E$ is almost optimal for the inequality then it is quantitatively close to a minimizer up to translations. Then, a delicate analysis is necessary to rule out the possibility of translations. As a step of our proof, we establish a sharp regularity result for restricted convex envelopes of a function that might be of independent interest.

preprint2019arXiv

On the sharp stability of critical points of the Sobolev inequality

Given $n\geq 3$, consider the critical elliptic equation $Δu + u^{2^*-1}=0$ in $\mathbb R^n$ with $u > 0$. This equation corresponds to the Euler-Lagrange equation induced by the Sobolev embedding $H^1(\mathbb R^n)\hookrightarrow L^{2^*}(\mathbb R^n)$, and it is well-known that the solutions are uniquely characterized and are given by the so-called ``Talenti bubbles''. In addition, thanks to a fundamental result by Struwe, this statement is ``stable up to bubbling'': if $u:\mathbb R^n\to(0,\infty)$ almost solves $Δu + u^{2^*-1}=0$ then $u$ is (nonquantitatively) close in the $H^1(\mathbb R^n)$-norm to a sum of weakly-interacting Talenti bubbles. More precisely, if $δ(u)$ denotes the $H^1(\mathbb R^n)$-distance of $u$ from the manifold of sums of Talenti bubbles, Struwe proved that $δ(u)\to 0$ as $\lVertΔu + u^{2^*-1}\rVert_{H^{-1}}\to 0$. In this paper we investigate the validity of a sharp quantitative version of the stability for critical points: more precisely, we ask whether under a bound on the energy $\lVert\nabla u\rVert_{L^2}$ (that controls the number of bubbles) it holds $δ(u) \lesssim \lVertΔu + u^{2^*-1}\rVert_{H^{-1}}$. A recent paper by the first author together with Ciraolo and Maggi shows that the above result is true if $u$ is close to only one bubble. Here we prove, to our surprise, that whenever there are at least two bubbles then the estimate above is true for $3\le n\le 5$ while it is false for $n\ge 6$. To our knowledge, this is the first situation where quantitative stability estimates depend so strikingly on the dimension of the space, changing completely behavior for some particular value of the dimension $n$.