Minkowski inequality for nearly spherical domains

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Abstract

We investigate the validity and the stability of various Minkowski-like inequalities for C1C^1-perturbations of the ball. Let K⊆RnK\subseteq\mathbb R^n be a domain (possibly not convex and not mean-convex) which is C1C^1-close to a ball. We prove the sharp geometric inequality (∫∂K∥II∥1dHn−1)1n−2≥C1(n)Per(K)1n−1, \left(\int_{\partial K} \lVert II\rVert_1 d\mathscr H^{n-1}\right)^{\frac1{n-2}} \ge C_1(n)Per(K)^{\frac1{n-1}} , where C1(n)C_1(n) is the constant that yields the equality when K=B1K=B_1 (and ∥II∥1\lVert II\rVert_1 is the sum of the absolute values of the eigenvalues of the second fundamental form IIII of ∂K\partial K). Moreover, for any δ>0δ>0, if KK is sufficiently C1C^1-close to a ball, we show the almost sharp Minkowski inequality (∫∂KH+dHn−1)1n−2≥(C1(n)−δ)Per(K)1n−1. \left(\int_{\partial K} H^+ d\mathscr H^{n-1}\right)^{\frac1{n-2}} \ge (C_1(n)-δ)Per(K)^{\frac1{n-1}} . If KK is axially symmetric, we prove the Minkowski inequality with the sharp constant (i.e., δ=0δ=0). We establish also the sharp quantitative stability (in the family of C1C^1-perturbations of the ball) of the volumetric Minkowski inequality (∫∂KH+dHn−1)1n−2≥C2(n)∣K∣1n, \left(\int_{\partial K} H^+ d\mathscr H^{n-1}\right)^{\frac1{n-2}} \ge C_2(n)|K|^{\frac1n} , where C2(n)C_2(n) is the constant that yields the equality when K=B1K=B_1. Finally, we show, by constructing a counterexample, that the mentioned inequalities are false (even for domains C1C^1-close to the ball) if one replaces H+H^+ with HH.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.