BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Eric Vigoda

Eric Vigoda contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Discrete MathematicsData Structures and Algorithmsmath.PRComputational ComplexityMachine Learningmath-phmath.MP

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Approximating observables is as hard as counting

We study the computational complexity of estimating local observables for Gibbs distributions. A simple combinatorial example is the average size of an independent set in a graph. In a recent work, we established NP-hardness of approximating the average size of an independent set utilizing hardness of the corresponding optimization problem and the related phase transition behavior. Here, we instead consider settings where the underlying optimization problem is easily solvable. Our main contribution is to classify the complexity of approximating a wide class of observables via a generic reduction from approximate counting to the problem of estimating local observables. The key idea is to use the observables to interpolate the counting problem. Using this new approach, we are able to study observables on bipartite graphs where the underlying optimization problem is easy but the counting problem is believed to be hard. The most-well studied class of graphs that was excluded from previous hardness results were bipartite graphs. We establish hardness for estimating the average size of the independent set in bipartite graphs of maximum degree 6; more generally, we show tight hardness results for general vertex-edge observables for antiferromagnetic 2-spin systems on bipartite graphs. Our techniques go beyond 2-spin systems, and for the ferromagnetic Potts model we establish hardness of approximating the number of monochromatic edges in the same region as known hardness of approximate counting results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Hardness of Identity Testing for Restricted Boltzmann Machines and Potts models

We study identity testing for restricted Boltzmann machines (RBMs), and more generally for undirected graphical models. Given sample access to the Gibbs distribution corresponding to an unknown or hidden model $M^*$ and given an explicit model $M$, can we distinguish if either $M = M^*$ or if they are (statistically) far apart? Daskalakis et al. (2018) presented a polynomial-time algorithm for identity testing for the ferromagnetic (attractive) Ising model. In contrast, for the antiferromagnetic (repulsive) Ising model, Bezáková et al. (2019) proved that unless $RP=NP$ there is no identity testing algorithm when $βd=ω(\log{n})$, where $d$ is the maximum degree of the visible graph and $β$ is the largest edge weight in absolute value. We prove analogous hardness results for RBMs (i.e., mixed Ising models on bipartite graphs), even when there are no latent variables or an external field. Specifically, we show that if $RP \neq NP$, then when $βd=ω(\log{n})$ there is no polynomial-time algorithm for identity testing for RBMs; when $βd =O(\log{n})$ there is an efficient identity testing algorithm that utilizes the structure learning algorithm of Klivans and Meka (2017). In addition, we prove similar lower bounds for purely ferromagnetic RBMs with inconsistent external fields, and for the ferromagnetic Potts model. Previous hardness results for identity testing of Bezáková et al. (2019) utilized the hardness of finding the maximum cuts, which corresponds to the ground states of the antiferromagnetic Ising model. Since RBMs are on bipartite graphs such an approach is not feasible. We instead introduce a general methodology to reduce from the corresponding approximate counting problem and utilize the phase transition that is exhibited by RBMs and the mean-field Potts model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Random Walks on Small World Networks

We study the mixing time of random walks on small-world networks modelled as follows: starting with the 2-dimensional periodic grid, each pair of vertices $\{u,v\}$ with distance $d>1$ is added as a &#34;long-range&#34; edge with probability proportional to $d^{-r}$, where $r\geq 0$ is a parameter of the model. Kleinberg studied a close variant of this network model and proved that the (decentralised) routing time is $O((\log n)^2)$ when $r=2$ and $n^{Ω(1)}$ when $r\neq 2$. Here, we prove that the random walk also undergoes a phase transition at $r=2$, but in this case the phase transition is of a different form. We establish that the mixing time is $Θ(\log n)$ for $r<2$, $O((\log n)^4)$ for $r=2$ and $n^{Ω(1)}$ for $r>2$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Rapid Mixing for Colorings via Spectral Independence

The spectral independence approach of Anari et al. (2020) utilized recent results on high-dimensional expanders of Alev and Lau (2020) and established rapid mixing of the Glauber dynamics for the hard-core model defined on weighted independent sets. We develop the spectral independence approach for colorings, and obtain new algorithmic results for the corresponding counting/sampling problems. Let $α^*\approx 1.763$ denote the solution to $\exp(1/x)=x$ and let $α>α^*$. We prove that, for any triangle-free graph $G=(V,E)$ with maximum degree $Δ$, for all $q\geqαΔ+1$, the mixing time of the Glauber dynamics for $q$-colorings is polynomial in $n=|V|$, with the exponent of the polynomial independent of $Δ$ and $q$. In comparison, previous approximate counting results for colorings held for a similar range of $q$ (asymptotically in $Δ$) but with larger girth requirement or with a running time where the polynomial exponent depended on $Δ$ and $q$ (exponentially). One further feature of using the spectral independence approach to study colorings is that it avoids many of the technical complications in previous approaches caused by coupling arguments or by passing to the complex plane; the key improvement on the running time is based on relatively simple combinatorial arguments which are then translated into spectral bounds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access