Paper detail

Improved Inapproximability Results for Counting Independent Sets in the Hard-Core Model

We study the computational complexity of approximately counting the number of independent sets of a graph with maximum degree Delta. More generally, for an input graph G=(V,E) and an activity lambda>0, we are interested in the quantity Z_G(lambda) defined as the sum over independent sets I weighted as w(I) = lambda^|I|. In statistical physics, Z_G(lambda) is the partition function for the hard-core model, which is an idealized model of a gas where the particles have non-negibile size. Recently, an interesting phase transition was shown to occur for the complexity of approximating the partition function. Weitz showed an FPAS for the partition function for any graph of maximum degree Delta when Delta is constant and lambda< lambda_c(Tree_Delta):=(Delta-1)^(Delta-1)/(Delta-2)^Delta. The quantity lambda_c(Tree_Delta) is the critical point for the so-called uniqueness threshold on the infinite, regular tree of degree Delta. On the other side, Sly proved that there does not exist efficient (randomized) approximation algorithms for lambda_c(Tree_Delta) < lambda < lambda_c(Tree_Delta)+epsilon(Delta), unless NP=RP, for some function epsilon(Delta)>0. We remove the upper bound in the assumptions of Sly&#39;s result for Delta not equal to 4 and 5, that is, we show that there does not exist efficient randomized approximation algorithms for all lambda>lambda_c(Tree_Delta) for Delta=3 and Delta>= 6. Sly&#39;s inapproximability result uses a clever reduction, combined with a second-moment analysis of Mossel, Weitz and Wormald which prove torpid mixing of the Glauber dynamics for sampling from the associated Gibbs distribution on almost every regular graph of degree Delta for the same range of lambda as in Sly&#39;s result. We extend Sly&#39;s result by improving upon the technical work of Mossel et al., via a more detailed analysis of independent sets in random regular graphs.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.