Paper detail

Improved Mixing Condition on the Grid for Counting and Sampling Independent Sets

We study the hard-core model defined on independent sets, where each independent set I in a graph G is weighted proportionally to $λ^{|I|}$, for a positive real parameter $λ$. For large $λ$, computing the partition function (namely, the normalizing constant which makes the weighting a probability distribution on a finite graph) on graphs of maximum degree $D\ge 3$, is a well known computationally challenging problem. More concretely, let $λ_c(T_D)$ denote the critical value for the so-called uniqueness threshold of the hard-core model on the infinite D-regular tree; recent breakthrough results of Dror Weitz (2006) and Allan Sly (2010) have identified $λ_c(T_D)$ as a threshold where the hardness of estimating the above partition function undergoes a computational transition. We focus on the well-studied particular case of the square lattice $\integers^2$, and provide a new lower bound for the uniqueness threshold, in particular taking it well above $λ_c(T_4)$. Our technique refines and builds on the tree of self-avoiding walks approach of Weitz, resulting in a new technical sufficient criterion (of wider applicability) for establishing strong spatial mixing (and hence uniqueness) for the hard-core model. Our new criterion achieves better bounds on strong spatial mixing when the graph has extra structure, improving upon what can be achieved by just using the maximum degree. Applying our technique to $\integers^2$ we prove that strong spatial mixing holds for all $λ<2.3882$, improving upon the work of Weitz that held for $λ<27/16=1.6875$. Our results imply a fully-polynomial deterministic approximation algorithm for estimating the partition function, as well as rapid mixing of the associated Glauber dynamics to sample from the hard-core distribution.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.