Paper detail

Inapproximability of the Partition Function for the Antiferromagnetic Ising and Hard-Core Models

Recent inapproximability results of Sly (2010), together with an approximation algorithm presented by Weitz (2006) establish a beautiful picture for the computational complexity of approximating the partition function of the hard-core model. Let $λ_c(T_Δ)$ denote the critical activity for the hard-model on the infinite $Δ$-regular tree. Weitz presented an FPTAS for the partition function when $λ<λ_c(T_Δ)$ for graphs with constant maximum degree $Δ$. In contrast, Sly showed that for all $Δ\geq 3$, there exists $ε_Δ>0$ such that (unless RP=NP) there is no FPRAS for approximating the partition function on graphs of maximum degree $Δ$ for activities $λ$ satisfying $λ_c(T_Δ)<λ<λ_c(T_Δ)+ε_Δ$. We prove that a similar phenomenon holds for the antiferromagnetic Ising model. Recent results of Li et al. and Sinclair et al. extend Weitz's approach to any 2-spin model, which includes the antiferromagnetic Ising model, to yield an FPTAS for the partition function for all graphs of constant maximum degree $Δ$ when the parameters of the model lie in the uniqueness regime of the infinite tree $T_Δ$. We prove the complementary result that for the antiferrogmanetic Ising model without external field that, unless RP=NP, for all $Δ\geq 3$, there is no FPRAS for approximating the partition function on graphs of maximum degree $Δ$ when the inverse temperature lies in the non-uniqueness regime of the infinite tree $T_Δ$. Our results extend to a region of the parameter space for general 2-spin models. Our proof works by relating certain second moment calculations for random $Δ$-regular bipartite graphs to the tree recursions used to establish the critical points on the infinite tree.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.