Inapproximability of the Partition Function for the Antiferromagnetic Ising and Hard-Core Models

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

Recent inapproximability results of Sly (2010), together with an approximation algorithm presented by Weitz (2006) establish a beautiful picture for the computational complexity of approximating the partition function of the hard-core model. Let λc(TΔ)λ_c(T_Δ) denote the critical activity for the hard-model on the infinite ΔΔ-regular tree. Weitz presented an FPTAS for the partition function when λ<λc(TΔ)λ<λ_c(T_Δ) for graphs with constant maximum degree ΔΔ. In contrast, Sly showed that for all Δ≥3Δ\geq 3, there exists εΔ>0ε_Δ>0 such that (unless RP=NP) there is no FPRAS for approximating the partition function on graphs of maximum degree ΔΔ for activities λλ satisfying λc(TΔ)<λ<λc(TΔ)+εΔλ_c(T_Δ)<λ<λ_c(T_Δ)+ε_Δ. We prove that a similar phenomenon holds for the antiferromagnetic Ising model. Recent results of Li et al. and Sinclair et al. extend Weitz's approach to any 2-spin model, which includes the antiferromagnetic Ising model, to yield an FPTAS for the partition function for all graphs of constant maximum degree ΔΔ when the parameters of the model lie in the uniqueness regime of the infinite tree TΔT_Δ. We prove the complementary result that for the antiferrogmanetic Ising model without external field that, unless RP=NP, for all Δ≥3Δ\geq 3, there is no FPRAS for approximating the partition function on graphs of maximum degree ΔΔ when the inverse temperature lies in the non-uniqueness regime of the infinite tree TΔT_Δ. Our results extend to a region of the parameter space for general 2-spin models. Our proof works by relating certain second moment calculations for random ΔΔ-regular bipartite graphs to the tree recursions used to establish the critical points on the infinite tree.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.