BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Chaitanya Swamy

Chaitanya Swamy contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete MathematicsComputer Science and Game Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A Constant-Factor Approximation for Directed Latency in Quasi-Polynomial Time

We give the first constant-factor approximation for the Directed Latency problem in quasi-polynomial time. Here, the goal is to visit all nodes in an asymmetric metric with a single vehicle starting at a depot $r$ to minimize the average time a node waits to be visited by the vehicle. The approximation guarantee is an improvement over the polynomial-time $O(\log n)$-approximation [Friggstad, Salavatipour, Svitkina, 2013] and no better quasi-polynomial time approximation algorithm was known. To obtain this, we must extend a recent result showing the integrality gap of the Asymmetric TSP-Path LP relaxation is bounded by a constant [Köhne, Traub, and Vygen, 2019], which itself builds on the breakthrough result that the integrality gap for standard Asymmetric TSP is also a constant [Svensson, Tarnawsi, and Vegh, 2018]. We show the standard Asymmetric TSP-Path integrality gap is bounded by a constant even if the cut requirements of the LP relaxation are relaxed from $x(δ^{in}(S)) \geq 1$ to $x(δ^{in}(S)) \geq ρ$ for some constant $1/2 < ρ\leq 1$. We also give a better approximation guarantee in the special case of Directed Latency in regret metrics where the goal is to find a path $P$ minimize the average time a node $v$ waits in excess of $c_{rv}$, i.e. $\frac{1}{|V|} \cdot \sum_{v \in V} (c_v(P)-c_{rv})$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Approximation Algorithms for Non-Single-minded Profit-Maximization Problems with Limited Supply

We consider {\em profit-maximization} problems for {\em combinatorial auctions} with {\em non-single minded valuation functions} and {\em limited supply}. We obtain fairly general results that relate the approximability of the profit-maximization problem to that of the corresponding {\em social-welfare-maximization} (SWM) problem, which is the problem of finding an allocation $(S_1,\ldots,S_n)$ satisfying the capacity constraints that has maximum total value $\sum_j v_j(S_j)$. For {\em subadditive valuations} (and hence {\em submodular, XOS valuations}), we obtain a solution with profit $\OPT_\swm/O(\log c_{\max})$, where $\OPT_\swm$ is the optimum social welfare and $c_{\max}$ is the maximum item-supply; thus, this yields an $O(\log c_{\max})$-approximation for the profit-maximization problem. Furthermore, given {\em any} class of valuation functions, if the SWM problem for this valuation class has an LP-relaxation (of a certain form) and an algorithm &#34;verifying&#34; an {\em integrality gap} of $\al$ for this LP, then we obtain a solution with profit $\OPT_\swm/O(\al\log c_{\max})$, thus obtaining an $O(\al\log c_{\max})$-approximation. For the special case, when the tree is a path, we also obtain an incomparable $O(\log m)$-approximation (via a different approach) for subadditive valuations, and arbitrary valuations with unlimited supply. Our approach for the latter problem also gives an $\frac{e}{e-1}$-approximation algorithm for the multi-product pricing problem in the Max-Buy model, with limited supply, improving on the previously known approximation factor of 2.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Approximation Algorithms for Regret-Bounded Vehicle Routing and Applications to Distance-Constrained Vehicle Routing

We consider vehicle-routing problems (VRPs) that incorporate the notion of {\em regret} of a client, which is a measure of the waiting time of a client relative to its shortest-path distance from the depot. Formally, we consider both the additive and multiplicative versions of, what we call, the {\em regret-bounded vehicle routing problem} (RVRP). In these problems, we are given an undirected complete graph $G=(\{r\}\cup V,E)$ on $n$ nodes with a distinguished root (depot) node $r$, edge costs $\{c_{uv}\}$ that form a metric, and a regret bound $R$. Given a path $P$ rooted at $r$ and a node $v\in P$, let $c_P(v)$ be the distance from $r$ to $v$ along $P$. The goal is to find the fewest number of paths rooted at $r$ that cover all the nodes so that for every node $v$ covered by (say) path $P$: (i) its additive regret $c_P(v)-c_{rv}$, with respect to $P$ is at most $R$ in {\em additive-RVRP}; or (ii) its multiplicative regret, $c_P(c)/c_{rv}$, with respect to $P$ is at most $R$ in {\em multiplicative-RVRP}. Our main result is the {\em first} constant-factor approximation algorithm for additive-RVRP by devising rounding techniques for a natural {\em configuration-style LP}. This is a substantial improvement over the previous-best $O(\log n)$-approximation. Additive-RVRP turns out be a rather central vehicle-routing problem, whose study reveals insights into a variety of other regret-related problems as well as the classical {\em distance-constrained VRP} ({DVRP}). We obtain approximation ratios of $O\bigl(\log(\frac{R}{R-1})\bigr)$ for multiplicative-RVRP, and $O\bigl(\min\bigl\{\mathit{OPT},\frac{\log D}{\log\log D}\bigr\}\bigr)$ for DVRP with distance bound $D$ via reductions to additive-RVRP; the latter improves upon the previous-best approximation for DVRP.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Local-Search based Approximation Algorithms for Mobile Facility Location Problems

We consider the {\em mobile facility location} (\mfl) problem. We are given a set of facilities and clients located in a common metric space. The goal is to move each facility from its initial location to a destination and assign each client to the destination of some facility so as to minimize the sum of the movement-costs of the facilities and the client-assignment costs. This abstracts facility-location settings where one has the flexibility of moving facilities from their current locations to other destinations so as to serve clients more efficiently by reducing their assignment costs. We give the first {\em local-search based} approximation algorithm for this problem and achieve the best-known approximation guarantee. Our main result is $(3+ε)$-approximation for this problem for any constant $ε>0$ using local search. The previous best guarantee was an 8-approximation algorithm based on LP-rounding. Our guarantee {\em matches} the best-known approximation guarantee for the $k$-median problem. Since there is an approximation-preserving reduction from the $k$-median problem to \mfl, any improvement of our result would imply an analogous improvement for the $k$-median problem. Furthermore, {\em our analysis is tight} (up to $o(1)$ factors) since the tight example for the local-search based 3-approximation algorithm for $k$-median can be easily adapted to show that our local-search algorithm has a tight approximation ratio of 3. One of the chief novelties of the analysis is that in order to generate a suitable collection of local-search moves whose resulting inequalities yield the desired bound on the cost of a local-optimum, we define a tree-like structure that (loosely speaking) functions as a &#34;recursion tree&#34;, using which we spawn off local-search moves by exploring this tree to a constant depth.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Improved Approximation Guarantees for Lower-Bounded Facility Location

We consider the {\em lower-bounded facility location} (\lbfl) problem (also sometimes called {\em load-balanced facility location}), which is a generalization of {\em uncapacitated facility location} (\ufl), where each open facility is required to serve a certain {\em minimum} amount of demand. More formally, an instance $\I$ of \lbfl is specified by a set $\F$ of facilities with facility-opening costs $\{f_i\}$, a set $\D$ of clients, and connection costs $\{c_{ij}\}$ specifying the cost of assigning a client $j$ to a facility $i$, where the $c_{ij}$s form a metric. A feasible solution specifies a subset $F$ of facilities to open, and assigns each client $j$ to an open facility $i(j)\in F$ so that each open facility serves {\em at least $M$ clients}, where $M$ is an input parameter. The cost of such a solution is $\sum_{i\in F}f_i+\sum_j c_{i(j)j}$, and the goal is to find a feasible solution of minimum cost. The current best approximation ratio for \lbfl is 448 \cite{Svitkina08}. We substantially advance the state-of-the-art for \lbfl by devising an approximation algorithm for \lbfl that achieves a significantly-improved approximation guarantee of 82.6. Our improvement comes from a variety of ideas in algorithm design and analysis, which also yield new insights into \lbfl.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Facility Location with Client Latencies: Linear-Programming based Techniques for Minimum-Latency Problems

We introduce a problem that is a common generalization of the uncapacitated facility location and minimum latency (ML) problems, where facilities need to be opened to serve clients and also need to be sequentially activated before they can provide service. Formally, we are given a set \F of n facilities with facility-opening costs {f_i}, a set of m clients, and connection costs {c_{ij}} specifying the cost of assigning a client j to a facility i, a root node r denoting the depot, and a time metric d on \F\cup{r}. Our goal is to open a subset F of facilities, find a path P starting at r and spanning F to activate the open facilities, and connect each client j to a facility ϕ(j)\in F, so as to minimize \sum_{i\in F}f_i +\sum_{clients j}(c_{ϕ(j),j}+t_j), where t_j is the time taken to reach ϕ(j) along path P. We call this the minimum latency uncapacitated facility location (MLUFL) problem. Our main result is an O(\log n\max{\log n,\log m})-approximation for MLUFL. We also show that any improvement in this approximation guarantee, implies an improvement in the (current-best) approximation factor for group Steiner tree. We obtain constant approximations for two natural special cases of the problem: (a) related MLUFL (metric connection costs that are a scalar multiple of the time metric); (b) metric uniform MLUFL (metric connection costs, unform time-metric). Our LP-based methods are versatile and easily adapted to yield approximation guarantees for MLUFL in various more general settings, such as (i) when the latency-cost of a client is a function of the delay faced by the facility to which it is connected; and (ii) the k-route version, where k vehicles are routed in parallel to activate the open facilities. Our LP-based understanding of MLUFL also offers some LP-based insights into ML, which we believe is a promising direction for obtaining improvements for ML.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access