Source author record

Sara Ahmadian

Sara Ahmadian appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Data Structures and Algorithms Machine Learning Discrete Mathematics Artificial Intelligence

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works

4topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2026arXiv

Stochastic Matching via Local Sparsification

The classic online stochastic matching problem typically requires immediate and irrevocable matching decisions. However, in many modern decentralized systems such as real-time ride-hailing and distributed cloud computing, the primary bottleneck is often local communication bandwidth rather than the timing of the match itself. We formalize this challenge by introducing a two-stage local sparsification framework. In this setting, arriving requests must prune their realized compatibility sets to a strict budget of $k$ edges before a central coordinator optimizes the global matching. This creates a "middle ground" between local information constraints and global optimization utility. We propose a local selection strategy, parametrized by a fractional solution of the expected instance. Theoretically, we quantify the approximation ratio as a function of the solution's {\em spread}. We prove that under sufficient spread, our sparsifier globally preserves the expected size of the maximum matching. Empirically, we demonstrate the robustness of our approach using the New York City ride-hailing datasets and adversarial synthetic benchmarks. Our results show that near-optimal global matching is achievable even with highly constrained local budgets, significantly outperforming standard online baselines.

preprint2022arXiv

Improved Approximation for Fair Correlation Clustering

Correlation clustering is a ubiquitous paradigm in unsupervised machine learning where addressing unfairness is a major challenge. Motivated by this, we study Fair Correlation Clustering where the data points may belong to different protected groups and the goal is to ensure fair representation of all groups across clusters. Our paper significantly generalizes and improves on the quality guarantees of previous work of Ahmadi et al. and Ahmadian et al. as follows. - We allow the user to specify an arbitrary upper bound on the representation of each group in a cluster. - Our algorithm allows individuals to have multiple protected features and ensure fairness simultaneously across them all. - We prove guarantees for clustering quality and fairness in this general setting. Furthermore, this improves on the results for the special cases studied in previous work. Our experiments on real-world data demonstrate that our clustering quality compared to the optimal solution is much better than what our theoretical result suggests.

preprint2021arXiv

Maximizing Agreements for Ranking, Clustering and Hierarchical Clustering via MAX-CUT

In this paper, we study a number of well-known combinatorial optimization problems that fit in the following paradigm: the input is a collection of (potentially inconsistent) local relationships between the elements of a ground set (e.g., pairwise comparisons, similar/dissimilar pairs, or ancestry structure of triples of points), and the goal is to aggregate this information into a global structure (e.g., a ranking, a clustering, or a hierarchical clustering) in a way that maximizes agreement with the input. Well-studied problems such as rank aggregation, correlation clustering, and hierarchical clustering with triplet constraints fall in this class of problems. We study these problems on stochastic instances with a hidden embedded ground truth solution. Our main algorithmic contribution is a unified technique that uses the maximum cut problem in graphs to approximately solve these problems. Using this technique, we can often get approximation guarantees in the stochastic setting that are better than the known worst case inapproximability bounds for the corresponding problem. On the negative side, we improve the worst case inapproximability bound on several hierarchical clustering formulations through a reduction to related ranking problems.

preprint2020arXiv

Fair Correlation Clustering

In this paper, we study correlation clustering under fairness constraints. Fair variants of $k$-median and $k$-center clustering have been studied recently, and approximation algorithms using a notion called fairlet decomposition have been proposed. We obtain approximation algorithms for fair correlation clustering under several important types of fairness constraints. Our results hinge on obtaining a fairlet decomposition for correlation clustering by introducing a novel combinatorial optimization problem. We define a fairlet decomposition with cost similar to the $k$-median cost and this allows us to obtain approximation algorithms for a wide range of fairness constraints. We complement our theoretical results with an in-depth analysis of our algorithms on real graphs where we show that fair solutions to correlation clustering can be obtained with limited increase in cost compared to the state-of-the-art (unfair) algorithms.

preprint2020arXiv

Fair Hierarchical Clustering

As machine learning has become more prevalent, researchers have begun to recognize the necessity of ensuring machine learning systems are fair. Recently, there has been an interest in defining a notion of fairness that mitigates over-representation in traditional clustering. In this paper we extend this notion to hierarchical clustering, where the goal is to recursively partition the data to optimize a specific objective. For various natural objectives, we obtain simple, efficient algorithms to find a provably good fair hierarchical clustering. Empirically, we show that our algorithms can find a fair hierarchical clustering, with only a negligible loss in the objective.

preprint2016arXiv

Approximation Algorithms for Clustering Problems with Lower Bounds and Outliers

We consider clustering problems with {\em non-uniform lower bounds and outliers}, and obtain the {\em first approximation guarantees} for these problems. We have a set $\F$ of facilities with lower bounds $\{L_i\}_{i\in\F}$ and a set $\D$ of clients located in a common metric space $\{c(i,j)\}_{i,j\in\F\cup\D}$, and bounds $k$, $m$. A feasible solution is a pair $\bigl(S\sse\F,σ:\D\mapsto S\cup\{\mathsf{out}\}\bigr)$, where $σ$ specifies the client assignments, such that $|S|\leq k$, $|σ^{-1}(i)|\geq L_i$ for all $i\in S$, and $|σ^{-1}(\mathsf{out})|\leq m$. In the {\em lower-bounded min-sum-of-radii with outliers} (\lbksro) problem, the objective is to minimize $\sum_{i\in S}\max_{j\inσ^{-1}(i)}c(i,j)$, and in the {\em lower-bounded $k$-supplier with outliers} (\lbkso) problem, the objective is to minimize $\max_{i\in S}\max_{j\inσ^{-1}(i)}c(i,j)$. We obtain an approximation factor of $12.365$ for \lbksro, which improves to $3.83$ for the non-outlier version (i.e., $m=0$). These also constitute the {\em first} approximation bounds for the min-sum-of-radii objective when we consider lower bounds and outliers {\em separately}. We apply the primal-dual method to the relaxation where we Lagrangify the $|S|\leq k$ constraint. The chief technical contribution and novelty of our algorithm is that, departing from the standard paradigm used for such constrained problems, we obtain an $O(1)$-approximation {\em despite the fact that we do not obtain a Lagrangian-multiplier-preserving algorithm for the Lagrangian relaxation}. We believe that our ideas have {broader applicability to other clustering problems with outliers as well.} We obtain approximation factors of $5$ and $3$ respectively for \lbkso and its non-outlier version. These are the {\em first} approximation results for $k$-supplier with {\em non-uniform} lower bounds.

preprint2013arXiv

Local-Search based Approximation Algorithms for Mobile Facility Location Problems

We consider the {\em mobile facility location} (\mfl) problem. We are given a set of facilities and clients located in a common metric space. The goal is to move each facility from its initial location to a destination and assign each client to the destination of some facility so as to minimize the sum of the movement-costs of the facilities and the client-assignment costs. This abstracts facility-location settings where one has the flexibility of moving facilities from their current locations to other destinations so as to serve clients more efficiently by reducing their assignment costs. We give the first {\em local-search based} approximation algorithm for this problem and achieve the best-known approximation guarantee. Our main result is $(3+ε)$-approximation for this problem for any constant $ε>0$ using local search. The previous best guarantee was an 8-approximation algorithm based on LP-rounding. Our guarantee {\em matches} the best-known approximation guarantee for the $k$-median problem. Since there is an approximation-preserving reduction from the $k$-median problem to \mfl, any improvement of our result would imply an analogous improvement for the $k$-median problem. Furthermore, {\em our analysis is tight} (up to $o(1)$ factors) since the tight example for the local-search based 3-approximation algorithm for $k$-median can be easily adapted to show that our local-search algorithm has a tight approximation ratio of 3. One of the chief novelties of the analysis is that in order to generate a suitable collection of local-search moves whose resulting inequalities yield the desired bound on the cost of a local-optimum, we define a tree-like structure that (loosely speaking) functions as a "recursion tree", using which we spawn off local-search moves by exploring this tree to a constant depth.

preprint2012arXiv

Improved Approximation Guarantees for Lower-Bounded Facility Location

We consider the {\em lower-bounded facility location} (\lbfl) problem (also sometimes called {\em load-balanced facility location}), which is a generalization of {\em uncapacitated facility location} (\ufl), where each open facility is required to serve a certain {\em minimum} amount of demand. More formally, an instance $\I$ of \lbfl is specified by a set $\F$ of facilities with facility-opening costs $\{f_i\}$, a set $\D$ of clients, and connection costs $\{c_{ij}\}$ specifying the cost of assigning a client $j$ to a facility $i$, where the $c_{ij}$s form a metric. A feasible solution specifies a subset $F$ of facilities to open, and assigns each client $j$ to an open facility $i(j)\in F$ so that each open facility serves {\em at least $M$ clients}, where $M$ is an input parameter. The cost of such a solution is $\sum_{i\in F}f_i+\sum_j c_{i(j)j}$, and the goal is to find a feasible solution of minimum cost. The current best approximation ratio for \lbfl is 448 \cite{Svitkina08}. We substantially advance the state-of-the-art for \lbfl by devising an approximation algorithm for \lbfl that achieves a significantly-improved approximation guarantee of 82.6. Our improvement comes from a variety of ideas in algorithm design and analysis, which also yield new insights into \lbfl.