Paper detail

Approximating Min-Cost Chain-Constrained Spanning Trees: A Reduction from Weighted to Unweighted Problems

We study the {\em min-cost chain-constrained spanning-tree} (abbreviated \mcst) problem: find a min-cost spanning tree in a graph subject to degree constraints on a nested family of node sets. We devise the {\em first} polytime algorithm that finds a spanning tree that (i) violates the degree constraints by at most a constant factor {\em and} (ii) whose cost is within a constant factor of the optimum. Previously, only an algorithm for {\em unweighted} \cst was known \cite{olver}, which satisfied (i) but did not yield any cost bounds. This also yields the first result that obtains an $O(1)$-factor for {\em both} the cost approximation and violation of degree constraints for any spanning-tree problem with general degree bounds on node sets, where an edge participates in a super-constant number of degree constraints. A notable feature of our algorithm is that we {\em reduce} \mcst to unweighted \cst (and then utilize \cite{olver}) via a novel application of {\em Lagrangian duality} to simplify the {\em cost structure} of the underlying problem and obtain a decomposition into certain uniform-cost subproblems. We show that this Lagrangian-relaxation based idea is in fact applicable more generally and, for any cost-minimization problem with packing side-constraints, yields a reduction from the weighted to the unweighted problem. We believe that this reduction is of independent interest. As another application of our technique, we consider the {\em $k$-budgeted matroid basis} problem, where we build upon a recent rounding algorithm of \cite{BansalN16} to obtain an improved $n^{O(k^{1.5}/ε)}$-time algorithm that returns a solution that satisfies (any) one of the budget constraints exactly and incurs a $(1+ε)$-violation of the other budget constraints.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.