BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Andrea Montanari

Andrea Montanari contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.STStatistics TheoryMachine Learningmath.PRcond-mat.dis-nnComputationcond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MPmath.OCMethodology

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
14works
0followers
11topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

14 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Fundamental Barriers to High-Dimensional Regression with Convex Penalties

In high-dimensional regression, we attempt to estimate a parameter vector $β_0\in\mathbb{R}^p$ from $n\lesssim p$ observations $\{(y_i,x_i)\}_{i\leq n}$ where $x_i\in\mathbb{R}^p$ is a vector of predictors and $y_i$ is a response variable. A well-established approach uses convex regularizers to promote specific structures (e.g. sparsity) of the estimate $\widehatβ$, while allowing for practical algorithms. Theoretical analysis implies that convex penalization schemes have nearly optimal estimation properties in certain settings. However, in general the gaps between statistically optimal estimation (with unbounded computational resources) and convex methods are poorly understood. We show that when the statistican has very simple structural information about the distribution of the entries of $β_0$, a large gap frequently exists between the best performance achieved by any convex regularizer satisfying a mild technical condition and either (i) the optimal statistical error or (ii) the statistical error achieved by optimal approximate message passing algorithms. Remarkably, a gap occurs at high enough signal-to-noise ratio if and only if the distribution of the coordinates of $β_0$ is not log-concave. These conclusions follow from an analysis of standard Gaussian designs. Our lower bounds are expected to be generally tight, and we prove tightness under certain conditions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Optimization of random high-dimensional functions: Structure and algorithms

Replica symmetry breaking postulates that near optima of spin glass Hamiltonians have an ultrametric structure. Namely, near optima can be associated to leaves of a tree, and the Euclidean distance between them corresponds to the distance along this tree. We survey recent progress towards a rigorous proof of this picture in the context of mixed $p$-spin spin glass models. We focus in particular on the following topics: $(i)$~The structure of critical points of the Hamiltonian; $(ii)$~The realization of the ultrametric tree as near optima of a suitable TAP free energy; $(iii)$~The construction of efficient optimization algorithm that exploits this picture.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Statistically Optimal First Order Algorithms: A Proof via Orthogonalization

We consider a class of statistical estimation problems in which we are given a random data matrix ${\boldsymbol X}\in {\mathbb R}^{n\times d}$ (and possibly some labels ${\boldsymbol y}\in{\mathbb R}^n$) and would like to estimate a coefficient vector ${\boldsymbol θ}\in{\mathbb R}^d$ (or possibly a constant number of such vectors). Special cases include low-rank matrix estimation and regularized estimation in generalized linear models (e.g., sparse regression). First order methods proceed by iteratively multiplying current estimates by ${\boldsymbol X}$ or its transpose. Examples include gradient descent or its accelerated variants. Celentano, Montanari, Wu proved that for any constant number of iterations (matrix vector multiplications), the optimal first order algorithm is a specific approximate message passing algorithm (known as `Bayes AMP'). The error of this estimator can be characterized in the high-dimensional asymptotics $n,d\to\infty$, $n/d\toδ$, and provides a lower bound to the estimation error of any first order algorithm. Here we present a simpler proof of the same result, and generalize it to broader classes of data distributions and of first order algorithms, including algorithms with non-separable nonlinearities. Most importantly, the new proof technique does not require to construct an equivalent tree-structured estimation problem, and is therefore susceptible of a broader range of applications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Interpolation Phase Transition in Neural Networks: Memorization and Generalization under Lazy Training

Modern neural networks are often operated in a strongly overparametrized regime: they comprise so many parameters that they can interpolate the training set, even if actual labels are replaced by purely random ones. Despite this, they achieve good prediction error on unseen data: interpolating the training set does not lead to a large generalization error. Further, overparametrization appears to be beneficial in that it simplifies the optimization landscape. Here we study these phenomena in the context of two-layers neural networks in the neural tangent (NT) regime. We consider a simple data model, with isotropic covariates vectors in $d$ dimensions, and $N$ hidden neurons. We assume that both the sample size $n$ and the dimension $d$ are large, and they are polynomially related. Our first main result is a characterization of the eigenstructure of the empirical NT kernel in the overparametrized regime $Nd\gg n$. This characterization implies as a corollary that the minimum eigenvalue of the empirical NT kernel is bounded away from zero as soon as $Nd\gg n$, and therefore the network can exactly interpolate arbitrary labels in the same regime. Our second main result is a characterization of the generalization error of NT ridge regression including, as a special case, min-$\ell_2$ norm interpolation. We prove that, as soon as $Nd\gg n$, the test error is well approximated by the one of kernel ridge regression with respect to the infinite-width kernel. The latter is in turn well approximated by the error of polynomial ridge regression, whereby the regularization parameter is increased by a `self-induced' term related to the high-degree components of the activation function. The polynomial degree depends on the sample size and the dimension (in particular on $\log n/\log d$).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Generalization error of random features and kernel methods: hypercontractivity and kernel matrix concentration

Consider the classical supervised learning problem: we are given data $(y_i,{\boldsymbol x}_i)$, $i\le n$, with $y_i$ a response and ${\boldsymbol x}_i\in {\mathcal X}$ a covariates vector, and try to learn a model $f:{\mathcal X}\to{\mathbb R}$ to predict future responses. Random features methods map the covariates vector ${\boldsymbol x}_i$ to a point ${\boldsymbol ϕ}({\boldsymbol x}_i)$ in a higher dimensional space ${\mathbb R}^N$, via a random featurization map ${\boldsymbol ϕ}$. We study the use of random features methods in conjunction with ridge regression in the feature space ${\mathbb R}^N$. This can be viewed as a finite-dimensional approximation of kernel ridge regression (KRR), or as a stylized model for neural networks in the so called lazy training regime. We define a class of problems satisfying certain spectral conditions on the underlying kernels, and a hypercontractivity assumption on the associated eigenfunctions. These conditions are verified by classical high-dimensional examples. Under these conditions, we prove a sharp characterization of the error of random features ridge regression. In particular, we address two fundamental questions: $(1)$~What is the generalization error of KRR? $(2)$~How big $N$ should be for the random features approximation to achieve the same error as KRR? In this setting, we prove that KRR is well approximated by a projection onto the top $\ell$ eigenfunctions of the kernel, where $\ell$ depends on the sample size $n$. We show that the test error of random features ridge regression is dominated by its approximation error and is larger than the error of KRR as long as $N\le n^{1-δ}$ for some $δ>0$. We characterize this gap. For $N\ge n^{1+δ}$, random features achieve the same error as the corresponding KRR, and further increasing $N$ does not lead to a significant change in test error.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Learning with invariances in random features and kernel models

A number of machine learning tasks entail a high degree of invariance: the data distribution does not change if we act on the data with a certain group of transformations. For instance, labels of images are invariant under translations of the images. Certain neural network architectures -- for instance, convolutional networks -- are believed to owe their success to the fact that they exploit such invariance properties. With the objective of quantifying the gain achieved by invariant architectures, we introduce two classes of models: invariant random features and invariant kernel methods. The latter includes, as a special case, the neural tangent kernel for convolutional networks with global average pooling. We consider uniform covariates distributions on the sphere and hypercube and a general invariant target function. We characterize the test error of invariant methods in a high-dimensional regime in which the sample size and number of hidden units scale as polynomials in the dimension, for a class of groups that we call `degeneracy $α$', with $α\leq 1$. We show that exploiting invariance in the architecture saves a $d^α$ factor ($d$ stands for the dimension) in sample size and number of hidden units to achieve the same test error as for unstructured architectures. Finally, we show that output symmetrization of an unstructured kernel estimator does not give a significant statistical improvement; on the other hand, data augmentation with an unstructured kernel estimator is equivalent to an invariant kernel estimator and enjoys the same improvement in statistical efficiency.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

When Do Neural Networks Outperform Kernel Methods?

For a certain scaling of the initialization of stochastic gradient descent (SGD), wide neural networks (NN) have been shown to be well approximated by reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) methods. Recent empirical work showed that, for some classification tasks, RKHS methods can replace NNs without a large loss in performance. On the other hand, two-layers NNs are known to encode richer smoothness classes than RKHS and we know of special examples for which SGD-trained NN provably outperform RKHS. This is true even in the wide network limit, for a different scaling of the initialization. How can we reconcile the above claims? For which tasks do NNs outperform RKHS? If covariates are nearly isotropic, RKHS methods suffer from the curse of dimensionality, while NNs can overcome it by learning the best low-dimensional representation. Here we show that this curse of dimensionality becomes milder if the covariates display the same low-dimensional structure as the target function, and we precisely characterize this tradeoff. Building on these results, we present the spiked covariates model that can capture in a unified framework both behaviors observed in earlier work. We hypothesize that such a latent low-dimensional structure is present in image classification. We test numerically this hypothesis by showing that specific perturbations of the training distribution degrade the performances of RKHS methods much more significantly than NNs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Imputation for High-Dimensional Linear Regression

We study high-dimensional regression with missing entries in the covariates. A common strategy in practice is to \emph{impute} the missing entries with an appropriate substitute and then implement a standard statistical procedure acting as if the covariates were fully observed. Recent literature on this subject proposes instead to design a specific, often complicated or non-convex, algorithm tailored to the case of missing covariates. We investigate a simpler approach where we fill-in the missing entries with their conditional mean given the observed covariates. We show that this imputation scheme coupled with standard off-the-shelf procedures such as the LASSO and square-root LASSO retains the minimax estimation rate in the random-design setting where the covariates are i.i.d.\ sub-Gaussian. We further show that the square-root LASSO remains \emph{pivotal} in this setting. It is often the case that the conditional expectation cannot be computed exactly and must be approximated from data. We study two cases where the covariates either follow an autoregressive (AR) process, or are jointly Gaussian with sparse precision matrix. We propose tractable estimators for the conditional expectation and then perform linear regression via LASSO, and show similar estimation rates in both cases. We complement our theoretical results with simulations on synthetic and semi-synthetic examples, illustrating not only the sharpness of our bounds, but also the broader utility of this strategy beyond our theoretical assumptions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Linearized two-layers neural networks in high dimension

We consider the problem of learning an unknown function $f_{\star}$ on the $d$-dimensional sphere with respect to the square loss, given i.i.d. samples $\{(y_i,{\boldsymbol x}_i)\}_{i\le n}$ where ${\boldsymbol x}_i$ is a feature vector uniformly distributed on the sphere and $y_i=f_{\star}({\boldsymbol x}_i)+\varepsilon_i$. We study two popular classes of models that can be regarded as linearizations of two-layers neural networks around a random initialization: the random features model of Rahimi-Recht (RF); the neural tangent kernel model of Jacot-Gabriel-Hongler (NT). Both these approaches can also be regarded as randomized approximations of kernel ridge regression (with respect to different kernels), and enjoy universal approximation properties when the number of neurons $N$ diverges, for a fixed dimension $d$. We consider two specific regimes: the approximation-limited regime, in which $n=\infty$ while $d$ and $N$ are large but finite; and the sample size-limited regime in which $N=\infty$ while $d$ and $n$ are large but finite. In the first regime we prove that if $d^{\ell + δ} \le N\le d^{\ell+1-δ}$ for small $δ> 0$, then \RF\, effectively fits a degree-$\ell$ polynomial in the raw features, and \NT\, fits a degree-$(\ell+1)$ polynomial. In the second regime, both RF and NT reduce to kernel methods with rotationally invariant kernels. We prove that, if the number of samples is $d^{\ell + δ} \le n \le d^{\ell +1-δ}$, then kernel methods can fit at most a a degree-$\ell$ polynomial in the raw features. This lower bound is achieved by kernel ridge regression. Optimal prediction error is achieved for vanishing ridge regularization.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Optimization of Mean-field Spin Glasses

Mean-field spin glasses are families of random energy functions (Hamiltonians) on high-dimensional product spaces. In this paper we consider the case of Ising mixed $p$-spin models, namely Hamiltonians $H_N:Σ_N\to {\mathbb R}$ on the Hamming hypercube $Σ_N = \{\pm 1\}^N$, which are defined by the property that $\{H_N({\boldsymbol σ})\}_{{\boldsymbol σ}\in Σ_N}$ is a centered Gaussian process with covariance ${\mathbb E}\{H_N({\boldsymbol σ}_1)H_N({\boldsymbol σ}_2)\}$ depending only on the scalar product $\langle {\boldsymbol σ}_1,{\boldsymbol σ}_2\rangle$. The asymptotic value of the optimum $\max_{{\boldsymbol σ}\in Σ_N}H_N({\boldsymbol σ})$ was characterized in terms of a variational principle known as the Parisi formula, first proved by Talagrand and, in a more general setting, by Panchenko. The structure of superlevel sets is extremely rich and has been studied by a number of authors. Here we ask whether a near optimal configuration ${\boldsymbol σ}$ can be computed in polynomial time. We develop a message passing algorithm whose complexity per-iteration is of the same order as the complexity of evaluating the gradient of $H_N$, and characterize the typical energy value it achieves. When the $p$-spin model $H_N$ satisfies a certain no-overlap gap assumption, for any $\varepsilon>0$, the algorithm outputs ${\boldsymbol σ}\inΣ_N$ such that $H_N({\boldsymbol σ})\ge (1-\varepsilon)\max_{{\boldsymbol σ}'} H_N({\boldsymbol σ}')$, with high probability. The number of iterations is bounded in $N$ and depends uniquely on $\varepsilon$. More generally, regardless of whether the no-overlap gap assumption holds, the energy achieved is given by an extended variational principle, which generalizes the Parisi formula.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolation

Interpolators -- estimators that achieve zero training error -- have attracted growing attention in machine learning, mainly because state-of-the art neural networks appear to be models of this type. In this paper, we study minimum $\ell_2$ norm ("ridgeless") interpolation in high-dimensional least squares regression. We consider two different models for the feature distribution: a linear model, where the feature vectors $x_i \in {\mathbb R}^p$ are obtained by applying a linear transform to a vector of i.i.d. entries, $x_i = Σ^{1/2} z_i$ (with $z_i \in {\mathbb R}^p$); and a nonlinear model, where the feature vectors are obtained by passing the input through a random one-layer neural network, $x_i = φ(W z_i)$ (with $z_i \in {\mathbb R}^d$, $W \in {\mathbb R}^{p \times d}$ a matrix of i.i.d. entries, and $φ$ an activation function acting componentwise on $W z_i$). We recover -- in a precise quantitative way -- several phenomena that have been observed in large-scale neural networks and kernel machines, including the "double descent" behavior of the prediction risk, and the potential benefits of overparametrization.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

TAP free energy, spin glasses, and variational inference

We consider the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model of spin glasses with ferromagnetically biased couplings. For a specific choice of the couplings mean, the resulting Gibbs measure is equivalent to the Bayesian posterior for a high-dimensional estimation problem known as `$Z_2$ synchronization'. Statistical physics suggests to compute the expectation with respect to this Gibbs measure (the posterior mean in the synchronization problem), by minimizing the so-called Thouless-Anderson-Palmer (TAP) free energy, instead of the mean field (MF) free energy. We prove that this identification is correct, provided the ferromagnetic bias is larger than a constant (i.e. the noise level is small enough in synchronization). Namely, we prove that the scaled $\ell_2$ distance between any low energy local minimizers of the TAP free energy and the mean of the Gibbs measure vanishes in the large size limit. Our proof technique is based on upper bounding the expected number of critical points of the TAP free energy using the Kac-Rice formula.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The estimation error of general first order methods

Modern large-scale statistical models require to estimate thousands to millions of parameters. This is often accomplished by iterative algorithms such as gradient descent, projected gradient descent or their accelerated versions. What are the fundamental limits to these approaches? This question is well understood from an optimization viewpoint when the underlying objective is convex. Work in this area characterizes the gap to global optimality as a function of the number of iterations. However, these results have only indirect implications in terms of the gap to statistical optimality. Here we consider two families of high-dimensional estimation problems: high-dimensional regression and low-rank matrix estimation, and introduce a class of `general first order methods' that aim at efficiently estimating the underlying parameters. This class of algorithms is broad enough to include classical first order optimization (for convex and non-convex objectives), but also other types of algorithms. Under a random design assumption, we derive lower bounds on the estimation error that hold in the high-dimensional asymptotics in which both the number of observations and the number of parameters diverge. These lower bounds are optimal in the sense that there exist algorithms whose estimation error matches the lower bounds up to asymptotically negligible terms. We illustrate our general results through applications to sparse phase retrieval and sparse principal component analysis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

A Mean Field View of the Landscape of Two-Layers Neural Networks

Multi-layer neural networks are among the most powerful models in machine learning, yet the fundamental reasons for this success defy mathematical understanding. Learning a neural network requires to optimize a non-convex high-dimensional objective (risk function), a problem which is usually attacked using stochastic gradient descent (SGD). Does SGD converge to a global optimum of the risk or only to a local optimum? In the first case, does this happen because local minima are absent, or because SGD somehow avoids them? In the second, why do local minima reached by SGD have good generalization properties? In this paper we consider a simple case, namely two-layers neural networks, and prove that -in a suitable scaling limit- SGD dynamics is captured by a certain non-linear partial differential equation (PDE) that we call distributional dynamics (DD). We then consider several specific examples, and show how DD can be used to prove convergence of SGD to networks with nearly ideal generalization error. This description allows to 'average-out' some of the complexities of the landscape of neural networks, and can be used to prove a general convergence result for noisy SGD.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access