Paper detail

Hypothesis Testing in High-Dimensional Regression under the Gaussian Random Design Model: Asymptotic Theory

We consider linear regression in the high-dimensional regime where the number of observations $n$ is smaller than the number of parameters $p$. A very successful approach in this setting uses $\ell_1$-penalized least squares (a.k.a. the Lasso) to search for a subset of $s_0< n$ parameters that best explain the data, while setting the other parameters to zero. Considerable amount of work has been devoted to characterizing the estimation and model selection problems within this approach. In this paper we consider instead the fundamental, but far less understood, question of \emph{statistical significance}. More precisely, we address the problem of computing p-values for single regression coefficients. On one hand, we develop a general upper bound on the minimax power of tests with a given significance level. On the other, we prove that this upper bound is (nearly) achievable through a practical procedure in the case of random design matrices with independent entries. Our approach is based on a debiasing of the Lasso estimator. The analysis builds on a rigorous characterization of the asymptotic distribution of the Lasso estimator and its debiased version. Our result holds for optimal sample size, i.e., when $n$ is at least on the order of $s_0 \log(p/s_0)$. We generalize our approach to random design matrices with i.i.d. Gaussian rows $x_i\sim N(0,Σ)$. In this case we prove that a similar distributional characterization (termed `standard distributional limit') holds for $n$ much larger than $s_0(\log p)^2$. Finally, we show that for optimal sample size, $n$ being at least of order $s_0 \log(p/s_0)$, the standard distributional limit for general Gaussian designs can be derived from the replica heuristics in statistical physics.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors6 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.