Paper detail

Compressed Sensing over $\ell_p$-balls: Minimax Mean Square Error

We consider the compressed sensing problem, where the object $x_0 \in \bR^N$ is to be recovered from incomplete measurements $y = Ax_0 + z$; here the sensing matrix $A$ is an $n \times N$ random matrix with iid Gaussian entries and $n < N$. A popular method of sparsity-promoting reconstruction is $\ell^1$-penalized least-squares reconstruction (aka LASSO, Basis Pursuit). It is currently popular to consider the strict sparsity model, where the object $x_0$ is nonzero in only a small fraction of entries. In this paper, we instead consider the much more broadly applicable $\ell_p$-sparsity model, where $x_0$ is sparse in the sense of having $\ell_p$ norm bounded by $ξ\cdot N^{1/p}$ for some fixed $0 < p \leq 1$ and $ξ> 0$. We study an asymptotic regime in which $n$ and $N$ both tend to infinity with limiting ratio $n/N = δ\in (0,1)$, both in the noisy ($z \neq 0$) and noiseless ($z=0$) cases. Under weak assumptions on $x_0$, we are able to precisely evaluate the worst-case asymptotic minimax mean-squared reconstruction error (AMSE) for $\ell^1$ penalized least-squares: min over penalization parameters, max over $\ell_p$-sparse objects $x_0$. We exhibit the asymptotically least-favorable object (hardest sparse signal to recover) and the maximin penalization. Our explicit formulas unexpectedly involve quantities appearing classically in statistical decision theory. Occurring in the present setting, they reflect a deeper connection between penalized $\ell^1$ minimization and scalar soft thresholding. This connection, which follows from earlier work of the authors and collaborators on the AMP iterative thresholding algorithm, is carefully explained. Our approach also gives precise results under weak-$\ell_p$ ball coefficient constraints, as we show here.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.