BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Alistair Stewart

Alistair Stewart appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computational ComplexityData Structures and AlgorithmsMachine Learningmath.STStatistics TheoryComputer Science and Game Theorymath.PRCryptography and SecurityInformation Theorymath.ITDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingFormal Languages and Automata TheoryLogic in Computer Sciencemath.OC

Catalog footprint

What is connected

15works
14topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

15 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Bridging Sapling: Private Cross-Chain Transfers

Interoperability is one of the main challenges of blockchain technologies, which are generally designed as self-contained systems. Interoperability schemes for privacy-focused blockchains are particularly hard to design: they must integrate with the unique privacy features of the underlying blockchain so as to prove statements about specific transactions in protocols designed to obfuscate them. This has led to users being forced to weaken their privacy, e.g. by using centralised exchanges, to move assets from one chain to another. We present ZCLAIM, a framework for trustless cross-chain asset migration based on the Zcash privacy-protecting protocol. ZCLAIM integrates with an implementation of the Sapling version of Zcash on a smart-contract capable issuing chain in order to attain private cross-chain transfers. We show that a tokenised representation can be created via a set of collateralised intermediaries without relying on or revealing the total amount to any third party.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Outlier-Robust Learning of Ising Models Under Dobrushin's Condition

We study the problem of learning Ising models satisfying Dobrushin's condition in the outlier-robust setting where a constant fraction of the samples are adversarially corrupted. Our main result is to provide the first computationally efficient robust learning algorithm for this problem with near-optimal error guarantees. Our algorithm can be seen as a special case of an algorithm for robustly learning a distribution from a general exponential family. To prove its correctness for Ising models, we establish new anti-concentration results for degree-$2$ polynomials of Ising models that may be of independent interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

GRANDPA: a Byzantine Finality Gadget

Classic Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus protocols forfeit liveness in the face of asynchrony in order to preserve safety, whereas most deployed blockchain protocols forfeit safety in order to remain live. In this work, we achieve the best of both worlds by proposing a novel abstractions called the finality gadget. A finality gadget allows for transactions to always optimistically commit but informs the clients that these transactions might be unsafe. As a result, a blockchain can execute transactions optimistically and only commit them after they have been sufficiently and provably audited. In this work, we formally model the finality gadget abstraction, prove that it is impossible to solve it deterministically in full asynchrony (even though it is stronger than consensus) and provide a partially synchronous protocol which is currently securing a major blockchain. This way we show that the protocol designer can decouple safety and liveness in order to speed up recovery from failures. We believe that there can be other types of finality gadgets that provide weaker safety (e.g., probabilistic) in order to gain more efficiency and this can depend on the probability that the network is not in synchrony.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Overview of Polkadot and its Design Considerations

In this paper we describe the design components of the heterogenous multi-chain protocol Polkadot and explain how these components help Polkadot address some of the existing shortcomings of blockchain technologies. At present, a vast number of blockchain projects have been introduced and employed with various features that are not necessarily designed to work with each other. This makes it difficult for users to utilise a large number of applications on different blockchain projects. Moreover, with the increase in number of projects the security that each one is providing individually becomes weaker. Polkadot aims to provide a scalable and interoperable framework for multiple chains with pooled security that is achieved by the collection of components described in this paper.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Testing Bayesian Networks

This work initiates a systematic investigation of testing high-dimensional structured distributions by focusing on testing Bayesian networks -- the prototypical family of directed graphical models. A Bayesian network is defined by a directed acyclic graph, where we associate a random variable with each node. The value at any particular node is conditionally independent of all the other non-descendant nodes once its parents are fixed. Specifically, we study the properties of identity testing and closeness testing of Bayesian networks. Our main contribution is the first non-trivial efficient testing algorithms for these problems and corresponding information-theoretic lower bounds. For a wide range of parameter settings, our testing algorithms have sample complexity sublinear in the dimension and are sample-optimal, up to constant factors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Greatest Fixed Points of Probabilistic Min/Max Polynomial Equations, and Reachability for Branching Markov Decision Processes

We give polynomial time algorithms for quantitative (and qualitative) reachability analysis for Branching Markov Decision Processes (BMDPs). Specifically, given a BMDP, and given an initial population, where the objective of the controller is to maximize (or minimize) the probability of eventually reaching a population that contains an object of a desired (or undesired) type, we give algorithms for approximating the supremum (infimum) reachability probability, within desired precision epsilon > 0, in time polynomial in the encoding size of the BMDP and in log(1/epsilon). We furthermore give P-time algorithms for computing epsilon-optimal strategies for both maximization and minimization of reachability probabilities. We also give P-time algorithms for all associated qualitative analysis problems, namely: deciding whether the optimal (supremum or infimum) reachability probabilities are 0 or 1. Prior to this paper, approximation of optimal reachability probabilities for BMDPs was not even known to be decidable. Our algorithms exploit the following basic fact: we show that for any BMDP, its maximum (minimum) non-reachability probabilities are given by the greatest fixed point (GFP) solution g* in [0,1]^n of a corresponding monotone max (min) Probabilistic Polynomial System of equations (max/min-PPS), x=P(x), which are the Bellman optimality equations for a BMDP with non-reachability objectives. We show how to compute the GFP of max/min PPSs to desired precision in P-time. We also study more general Branching Simple Stochastic Games (BSSGs) with (non-)reachability objectives. We show that: (1) the value of these games is captured by the GFP of a corresponding max-minPPS; (2) the quantitative problem of approximating the value is in TFNP; and (3) the qualitative problems associated with the value are all solvable in P-time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Playing Anonymous Games using Simple Strategies

We investigate the complexity of computing approximate Nash equilibria in anonymous games. Our main algorithmic result is the following: For any $n$-player anonymous game with a bounded number of strategies and any constant $δ>0$, an $O(1/n^{1-δ})$-approximate Nash equilibrium can be computed in polynomial time. Complementing this positive result, we show that if there exists any constant $δ>0$ such that an $O(1/n^{1+δ})$-approximate equilibrium can be computed in polynomial time, then there is a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme for this problem. We also present a faster algorithm that, for any $n$-player $k$-strategy anonymous game, runs in time $\tilde O((n+k) k n^k)$ and computes an $\tilde O(n^{-1/3} k^{11/3})$-approximate equilibrium. This algorithm follows from the existence of simple approximate equilibria of anonymous games, where each player plays one strategy with probability $1-δ$, for some small $δ$, and plays uniformly at random with probability $δ$. Our approach exploits the connection between Nash equilibria in anonymous games and Poisson multinomial distributions (PMDs). Specifically, we prove a new probabilistic lemma establishing the following: Two PMDs, with large variance in each direction, whose first few moments are approximately matching are close in total variation distance. Our structural result strengthens previous work by providing a smooth tradeoff between the variance bound and the number of matching moments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

The Fourier Transform of Poisson Multinomial Distributions and its Algorithmic Applications

An $(n, k)$-Poisson Multinomial Distribution (PMD) is a random variable of the form $X = \sum_{i=1}^n X_i$, where the $X_i$'s are independent random vectors supported on the set of standard basis vectors in $\mathbb{R}^k.$ In this paper, we obtain a refined structural understanding of PMDs by analyzing their Fourier transform. As our core structural result, we prove that the Fourier transform of PMDs is {\em approximately sparse}, i.e., roughly speaking, its $L_1$-norm is small outside a small set. By building on this result, we obtain the following applications: {\bf Learning Theory.} We design the first computationally efficient learning algorithm for PMDs with respect to the total variation distance. Our algorithm learns an arbitrary $(n, k)$-PMD within variation distance $ε$ using a near-optimal sample size of $\widetilde{O}_k(1/ε^2),$ and runs in time $\widetilde{O}_k(1/ε^2) \cdot \log n.$ Previously, no algorithm with a $\mathrm{poly}(1/ε)$ runtime was known, even for $k=3.$ {\bf Game Theory.} We give the first efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme (EPTAS) for computing Nash equilibria in anonymous games. For normalized anonymous games with $n$ players and $k$ strategies, our algorithm computes a well-supported $ε$-Nash equilibrium in time $n^{O(k^3)} \cdot (k/ε)^{O(k^3\log(k/ε)/\log\log(k/ε))^{k-1}}.$ The best previous algorithm for this problem had running time $n^{(f(k)/ε)^k},$ where $f(k) = Ω(k^{k^2})$, for any $k>2.$ {\bf Statistics.} We prove a multivariate central limit theorem (CLT) that relates an arbitrary PMD to a discretized multivariate Gaussian with the same mean and covariance, in total variation distance. Our new CLT strengthens the CLT of Valiant and Valiant by completely removing the dependence on $n$ in the error bound.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Optimal Learning via the Fourier Transform for Sums of Independent Integer Random Variables

We study the structure and learnability of sums of independent integer random variables (SIIRVs). For $k \in \mathbb{Z}_{+}$, a $k$-SIIRV of order $n \in \mathbb{Z}_{+}$ is the probability distribution of the sum of $n$ independent random variables each supported on $\{0, 1, \dots, k-1\}$. We denote by ${\cal S}_{n,k}$ the set of all $k$-SIIRVs of order $n$. In this paper, we tightly characterize the sample and computational complexity of learning $k$-SIIRVs. More precisely, we design a computationally efficient algorithm that uses $\widetilde{O}(k/ε^2)$ samples, and learns an arbitrary $k$-SIIRV within error $ε,$ in total variation distance. Moreover, we show that the {\em optimal} sample complexity of this learning problem is $Θ((k/ε^2)\sqrt{\log(1/ε)}).$ Our algorithm proceeds by learning the Fourier transform of the target $k$-SIIRV in its effective support. Its correctness relies on the {\em approximate sparsity} of the Fourier transform of $k$-SIIRVs -- a structural property that we establish, roughly stating that the Fourier transform of $k$-SIIRVs has small magnitude outside a small set. Along the way we prove several new structural results about $k$-SIIRVs. As one of our main structural contributions, we give an efficient algorithm to construct a sparse {\em proper} $ε$-cover for ${\cal S}_{n,k},$ in total variation distance. We also obtain a novel geometric characterization of the space of $k$-SIIRVs. Our characterization allows us to prove a tight lower bound on the size of $ε$-covers for ${\cal S}_{n,k}$, and is the key ingredient in our tight sample complexity lower bound. Our approach of exploiting the sparsity of the Fourier transform in distribution learning is general, and has recently found additional applications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Properly Learning Poisson Binomial Distributions in Almost Polynomial Time

We give an algorithm for properly learning Poisson binomial distributions. A Poisson binomial distribution (PBD) of order $n$ is the discrete probability distribution of the sum of $n$ mutually independent Bernoulli random variables. Given $\widetilde{O}(1/ε^2)$ samples from an unknown PBD $\mathbf{p}$, our algorithm runs in time $(1/ε)^{O(\log \log (1/ε))}$, and outputs a hypothesis PBD that is $ε$-close to $\mathbf{p}$ in total variation distance. The previously best known running time for properly learning PBDs was $(1/ε)^{O(\log(1/ε))}$. As one of our main contributions, we provide a novel structural characterization of PBDs. We prove that, for all $ε>0,$ there exists an explicit collection $\cal{M}$ of $(1/ε)^{O(\log \log (1/ε))}$ vectors of multiplicities, such that for any PBD $\mathbf{p}$ there exists a PBD $\mathbf{q}$ with $O(\log(1/ε))$ distinct parameters whose multiplicities are given by some element of ${\cal M}$, such that $\mathbf{q}$ is $ε$-close to $\mathbf{p}$. Our proof combines tools from Fourier analysis and algebraic geometry. Our approach to the proper learning problem is as follows: Starting with an accurate non-proper hypothesis, we fit a PBD to this hypothesis. More specifically, we essentially start with the hypothesis computed by the computationally efficient non-proper learning algorithm in our recent work~\cite{DKS15}. Our aforementioned structural characterization allows us to reduce the corresponding fitting problem to a collection of $(1/ε)^{O(\log \log(1/ε))}$ systems of low-degree polynomial inequalities. We show that each such system can be solved in time $(1/ε)^{O(\log \log(1/ε))}$, which yields the overall running time of our algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

A note on the complexity of comparing succinctly represented integers, with an application to maximum probability parsing

The following two decision problems capture the complexity of comparing integers or rationals that are succinctly represented in product-of-exponentials notation, or equivalently, via arithmetic circuits using only multiplication and division gates, and integer inputs: Input instance: four lists of positive integers: a_1, ...., a_n ; b_1,...., b_n ; c_1,....,c_m ; d_1, ...., d_m ; where each of the integers is represented in binary. Problem 1 (equality testing): Decide whether a_1^{b_1} a_2^{b_2} .... a_n^{b_n} = c_1^{d_1} c_2^{d_2} .... c_m^{d_m} . Problem 2 (inequality testing): Decide whether a_1^{b_1} a_2^{b_2} ... a_n^{b_n} >= c_1^{d_1} c_2^{d_2} .... c_m^{d_m} . Problem 1 is easily decidable in polynomial time using a simple iterative algorithm. Problem 2 is much harder. We observe that the complexity of Problem 2 is intimately connected to deep conjectures and results in number theory. In particular, if a refined form of the ABC conjecture formulated by Baker in 1998 holds, or if the older Lang-Waldschmidt conjecture (formulated in 1978) on linear forms in logarithms holds, then Problem 2 is decidable in P-time (in the standard Turing model of computation). Moreover, it follows from the best available quantitative bounds on linear forms in logarithms, e.g., by Baker and Wüstholz (1993) or Matveev (2000), that if m and n are fixed universal constants then Problem 2 is decidable in P-time (without relying on any conjectures). This latter fact was observed earlier by Shub (1993). We describe one application: P-time maximum probability parsing for arbitrary stochastic context-free grammars (where ε-rules are allowed).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Polynomial Time Algorithms for Multi-Type Branching Processes and Stochastic Context-Free Grammars

We show that one can approximate the least fixed point solution for a multivariate system of monotone probabilistic polynomial equations in time polynomial in both the encoding size of the system of equations and in log(1/ε), where ε> 0 is the desired additive error bound of the solution. (The model of computation is the standard Turing machine model.) We use this result to resolve several open problems regarding the computational complexity of computing key quantities associated with some classic and heavily studied stochastic processes, including multi-type branching processes and stochastic context-free grammars.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Stochastic Context-Free Grammars, Regular Languages, and Newton's Method

We study the problem of computing the probability that a given stochastic context-free grammar (SCFG), G, generates a string in a given regular language L(D) (given by a DFA, D). This basic problem has a number of applications in statistical natural language processing, and it is also a key necessary step towards quantitative ω-regular model checking of stochastic context-free processes (equivalently, 1-exit recursive Markov chains, or stateless probabilistic pushdown processes). We show that the probability that G generates a string in L(D) can be computed to within arbitrary desired precision in polynomial time (in the standard Turing model of computation), under a rather mild assumption about the SCFG, G, and with no extra assumption about D. We show that this assumption is satisfied for SCFG's whose rule probabilities are learned via the well-known inside-outside (EM) algorithm for maximum-likelihood estimation (a standard method for constructing SCFGs in statistical NLP and biological sequence analysis). Thus, for these SCFGs the algorithm always runs in P-time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Upper bounds for Newton's method on monotone polynomial systems, and P-time model checking of probabilistic one-counter automata

A central computational problem for analyzing and model checking various classes of infinite-state recursive probabilistic systems (including quasi-birth-death processes, multi-type branching processes, stochastic context-free grammars, probabilistic pushdown automata and recursive Markov chains) is the computation of {\em termination probabilities}, and computing these probabilities in turn boils down to computing the {\em least fixed point} (LFP) solution of a corresponding {\em monotone polynomial system} (MPS) of equations, denoted x=P(x). It was shown by Etessami & Yannakakis that a decomposed variant of Newton's method converges monotonically to the LFP solution for any MPS that has a non-negative solution. Subsequently, Esparza, Kiefer, & Luttenberger obtained upper bounds on the convergence rate of Newton's method for certain classes of MPSs. More recently, better upper bounds have been obtained for special classes of MPSs. However, prior to this paper, for arbitrary (not necessarily strongly-connected) MPSs, no upper bounds at all were known on the convergence rate of Newton's method as a function of the encoding size |P| of the input MPS, x=P(x). In this paper we provide worst-case upper bounds, as a function of both the input encoding size |P|, and epsilon > 0, on the number of iterations required for decomposed Newton's method (even with rounding) to converge within additive error epsilon > 0 of q^*, for any MPS with LFP solution q^*. Our upper bounds are essentially optimal in terms of several important parameters. Using our upper bounds, and building on prior work, we obtain the first P-time algorithm (in the standard Turing model of computation) for quantitative model checking, to within desired precision, of discrete-time QBDs and (equivalently) probabilistic 1-counter automata, with respect to any (fixed) omega-regular or LTL property.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Polynomial Time Algorithms for Branching Markov Decision Processes and Probabilistic Min(Max) Polynomial Bellman Equations

We show that one can approximate the least fixed point solution for a multivariate system of monotone probabilistic max(min) polynomial equations, referred to as maxPPSs (and minPPSs, respectively), in time polynomial in both the encoding size of the system of equations and in log(1/epsilon), where epsilon > 0 is the desired additive error bound of the solution. (The model of computation is the standard Turing machine model.) We establish this result using a generalization of Newton's method which applies to maxPPSs and minPPSs, even though the underlying functions are only piecewise-differentiable. This generalizes our recent work which provided a P-time algorithm for purely probabilistic PPSs. These equations form the Bellman optimality equations for several important classes of infinite-state Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). Thus, as a corollary, we obtain the first polynomial time algorithms for computing to within arbitrary desired precision the optimal value vector for several classes of infinite-state MDPs which arise as extensions of classic, and heavily studied, purely stochastic processes. These include both the problem of maximizing and mininizing the termination (extinction) probability of multi-type branching MDPs, stochastic context-free MDPs, and 1-exit Recursive MDPs. Furthermore, we also show that we can compute in P-time an epsilon-optimal policy for both maximizing and minimizing branching, context-free, and 1-exit-Recursive MDPs, for any given desired epsilon > 0. This is despite the fact that actually computing optimal strategies is Sqrt-Sum-hard and PosSLP-hard in this setting. We also derive, as an easy consequence of these results, an FNP upper bound on the complexity of computing the value (within arbitrary desired precision) of branching simple stochastic games (BSSGs).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access