Paper detail

Optimization of the first CUPID detector module

CUPID will be a next generation experiment searching for the neutrinoless double $β$ decay, whose discovery would establish the Majorana nature of the neutrino. Based on the experience achieved with the CUORE experiment, presently taking data at LNGS, CUPID aims to reach a background free environment by means of scintillating Li$_{2}$$^{100}$MoO$_4$ crystals coupled to light detectors. Indeed, the simultaneous heat and light detection allows us to reject the dominant background of $α$ particles, as proven by the CUPID-0 and CUPID-Mo demonstrators. In this work we present the results of the first test of the CUPID baseline module. In particular, we propose a new optimized detector structure and light sensors design to enhance the engineering and the light collection, respectively. We characterized the heat detectors, achieving an energy resolution of (5.9 $\pm$ 0.2) keV FWHM at the $Q$-value of $^{100}$Mo (about 3034 keV). We studied the light collection of the baseline CUPID design with respect to an alternative configuration which features gravity-assisted light detectors' mounting. In both cases we obtained an improvement in the light collection with respect to past measures and we validated the particle identification capability of the detector, which ensures an $α$ particle rejection higher than 99.9%, fully satisfying the requirements for CUPID.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
CUPID collaborationA. ArmatolC. AugierF. T. Avignone IIIO. AzzoliniM. BalataK. BallenA. S. BarabashG. BariA. BarresiD. BaudinF. BelliniG. BenatoM. BerettaM. BettelliM. BiassoniJ. BillardV. BoldriniA. BrancaC. BrofferioC. BucciJ. CamilleriC. CapelliS. CapelliL. CappelliL. CardaniP. CarnitiN. CasaliE. CeliC. ChangD. ChiesaM. ClemenzaI. ColantoniS. CopelloE. CraftO. CremonesiR. J. CreswickA. CrucianiA. D'AddabboG. D'ImperioS. DabagovI. DafineiF. A. DanevichM. De JesusP. de MarcillacS. Dell'OroS. Di DomizioS. Di LorenzoT. DixonV. DompèA. DrobizhevL. DumoulinG. FantiniM. FaverzaniE. FerriF. FerriF. FerroniE. Figueroa-FelicianoL. FoggettaJ. FormaggioA. FranceschiC. FuS. FuB. K. FujikawaA. GallasJ. GasconS. GhislandiA. GiacheroA. GianvecchioL. GironiA. GiulianiP. GorlaC. GottiC. GrantP. GrasP. V. GuillaumonT. D. GutierrezK. HanE. V. HansenK. M. HeegerD. L. HelisH. Z. HuangR. G. HuangL. ImbertJ. JohnstonA. JuillardG. KarapetrovG. KeppelH. KhalifeV. V. KobychevYu. G. KolomenskyS. I. KonovalovR. KowalskiT. LangfordM . LefevreR. LiuY. LiuP. LoaizaL. MaM. MadhukuttanF. MancarellaL. MariniS. MarnierosM. MartinezR. H. MaruyamaPh. MasB. MauriD. MayerG. MazzitelliY. MeiS. MilanaS. MorgantiT. NapolitanoM. NastasiJ. NikkelS. NisiC. NonesE. B. NormanV. NovosadI. NutiniT. O'DonnellE. OlivieriM. OlmiJ. L. OuelletS. PaganC. PagliaroneL. PagnaniniL. PattavinaM. PavanH. PengG. PessinaV. PettinacciC. PiraS. PirroD. V. PodaO. G. PolischukI. PonceS. PozziE. PrevitaliA. PuiuS. QuitadamoA. RessaR. RizzoliC. RosenfeldP. RosierJ. ScarpaciB. SchmidtV. SharmaV. ShlegelV. SinghM. SistiP. SlocumD. SpellerP. T. SurukuchiL. TaffarelloC. TomeiJ. TorresV. I. TretyakA. TsymbaliukM. VelazquezK. J. VetterS. L. WagaarachchiG. WangL. WangR. WangB. WelliverJ. WilsonK. WilsonL. A. WinslowM. XueL. YanJ. YangV. YefremenkoV. I. UmatovM. M. ZarytskyyJ. ZhangA. ZolotarovaS. Zucchelli
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

CUPID collaborationA. ArmatolC. AugierF. T. Avignone IIIO. AzzoliniM. BalataK. BallenA. S. BarabashG. BariA. BarresiD. BaudinF. BelliniG. BenatoM. BerettaM. BettelliM. BiassoniJ. BillardV. BoldriniA. BrancaC. BrofferioC. BucciJ. CamilleriC. CapelliS. CapelliL. CappelliL. CardaniP. CarnitiN. CasaliE. CeliC. ChangD. ChiesaM. ClemenzaI. ColantoniS. CopelloE. CraftO. CremonesiR. J. CreswickA. CrucianiA. D'AddabboG. D'ImperioS. DabagovI. DafineiF. A. DanevichM. De JesusP. de MarcillacS. Dell'OroS. Di DomizioS. Di LorenzoT. DixonV. DompèA. DrobizhevL. DumoulinG. FantiniM. FaverzaniE. FerriF. FerriF. FerroniE. Figueroa-FelicianoL. FoggettaJ. FormaggioA. FranceschiC. FuS. FuB. K. FujikawaA. GallasJ. GasconS. GhislandiA. GiacheroA. GianvecchioL. GironiA. GiulianiP. GorlaC. GottiC. GrantP. GrasP. V. GuillaumonT. D. GutierrezK. HanE. V. HansenK. M. HeegerD. L. HelisH. Z. HuangR. G. HuangL. ImbertJ. JohnstonA. JuillardG. KarapetrovG. KeppelH. KhalifeV. V. KobychevYu. G. KolomenskyS. I. KonovalovR. KowalskiT. LangfordM . LefevreR. LiuY. LiuP. LoaizaL. MaM. MadhukuttanF. MancarellaL. MariniS. MarnierosM. MartinezR. H. MaruyamaPh. MasB. MauriD. MayerG. MazzitelliY. MeiS. MilanaS. MorgantiT. NapolitanoM. NastasiJ. NikkelS. NisiC. NonesE. B. NormanV. NovosadI. NutiniT. O'DonnellE. OlivieriM. OlmiJ. L. OuelletS. PaganC. PagliaroneL. PagnaniniL. PattavinaM. PavanH. PengG. PessinaV. PettinacciC. PiraS. PirroD. V. PodaO. G. PolischukI. PonceS. PozziE. PrevitaliA. PuiuS. QuitadamoA. RessaR. RizzoliC. RosenfeldP. RosierJ. ScarpaciB. SchmidtV. SharmaV. ShlegelV. SinghM. SistiP. SlocumD. SpellerP. T. SurukuchiL. TaffarelloC. TomeiJ. TorresV. I. TretyakA. TsymbaliukM. VelazquezK. J. VetterS. L. WagaarachchiG. WangL. WangR. WangB. WelliverJ. WilsonK. WilsonL. A. WinslowM. XueL. YanJ. YangV. YefremenkoV. I. UmatovM. M. ZarytskyyJ. ZhangA. ZolotarovaS. Zucchelli

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.