Paper detail

Measurement of the branching ratio of $\bar{B}^0 \rightarrow D^{*+} τ^- \barν_τ$ relative to $\bar{B}^0 \rightarrow D^{*+} \ell^- \barν_{\ell}$ decays with a semileptonic tagging method

We report a measurement of the ratio ${\cal R}(D^*) = {\cal B}(\bar{B}^0 \rightarrow D^{*+} τ^- \barν_τ)/{\cal B}(\bar{B}^0 \rightarrow D^{*+} \ell^- \barν_{\ell})$, where $\ell$ denotes an electron or a muon. The results are based on a data sample containing $772\times10^6$ $B\bar{B}$ pairs recorded at the $Υ(4S)$ resonance with the Belle detector at the KEKB $e^+ e^-$ collider. We select a sample of $B^0 \bar{B}^0$ pairs by reconstructing both $B$ mesons in semileptonic decays to $D^{*\mp} \ell^{\pm}$. We measure ${\cal R}(D^*)= 0.302 \pm 0.030({\rm stat)} \pm 0.011({\rm syst)}$, which is within $1.6 σ$ of the Standard Model theoretical expectation, where the standard deviation $σ$ includes systematic uncertainties. We use this measurement to constrain several scenarios of new physics in a model-independent approach.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
Y. SatoT. IijimaK. AdamczykH. AiharaD. M. AsnerH. AtmacanT. AushevR. AyadT. AzizV. BabuI. BadhreesA. M. BakichV. BansalP. BeheraV. BhardwajB. BhuyanJ. BiswalG. BonviciniA. BozekM. BraD. P. ChangV. ChekelianA. ChenB. G. CheonK. ChilikinR. ChistovK. ChoV. ChobanovaY. ChoiD. CinabroM. DanilovN. DashS. Di CarloZ. DoleD. DuttaS. EidelmanD. EpifanovH. FarhatJ. E. FastT. FerberB. G. FulsomV. GaurN. GabyshevA. GarmashP. GoldenzweigB. GolobD. GreenwaldK. HaraT. HaraJ. HasenbuschK. HayasakaH. HayashiiS. HiroseT. HoriguchiW. -S. HouK. InamiA. IshikawaR. ItohY. IwasakiI. JaegleH. B. JeonD. JoffeT. JuliusK. H. KangY. KatoP. KatrenkoT. KawasakiD. Y. KimJ. B. KimK. T. KimM. J. KimS. H. KimY. J. KimK. KinoshitaP. KodyS. KorparD. KotchetkovP. KrokovnyT. KuhrR. KumarY. -J. KwonJ. S. LangeC. H. LiL. LiY. LiL. Li GioiJ. LibbyD. LiventsevT. LuoM. MasudaT. MatsudaD. MatvienkoK. MiyabayashiH. MiyataR. MizukG. B. MohantyA. MollH. K. MoonK. R. NakamuraE. NakanoM. NakaoT. NanutK. J. NathZ. NatkaniecM. NayakK. NegishiN. K. NisarS. NishidaS. OgawaS. OkunoS. L. OlsenY. OnukiP. PakhlovG. PakhlovaB. PalC. -S. ParkS. PaulT. K. PedlarL. PesR. PestotnikM. PetriL. E. PiilonenM. V. PurohitJ. RauchA. RostomyanM. RozanskaY. SakaiS. SandilyaL. SanteljV. SavinovT. SchlO. SchneiderG. SchnellC. SchwandaA. J. SchwartzY. SeinoK. SenyoO. SeonM. E. SeviorV. ShebalinC. P. ShenT. -A. ShibataJ. -G. ShiuB. ShwartzF. SimonE. SolovievaS. StaniM. StariJ. F. StrubeT. SumiyoshiM. TakizawaU. TamponiF. TenchiniK. TrabelsiM. UchidaS. UnoP. UrquijoY. UshirodaY. UsovC. Van HulseG. VarnerA. VinokurovaV. VorobyevC. H. WangM. -Z. WangP. WangY. WatanabeK. M. WilliamsE. WonH. YamamotoJ. YamaokaY. YamashitaJ. YeltonY. YookC. Z. YuanY. YusaZ. P. ZhangV. ZhilichV. ZhukovaV. ZhulanovA. Zupanc

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access173 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Y. SatoT. IijimaK. AdamczykH. AiharaD. M. AsnerH. AtmacanT. AushevR. AyadT. AzizV. BabuI. BadhreesA. M. BakichV. BansalP. BeheraV. BhardwajB. BhuyanJ. BiswalG. BonviciniA. BozekM. BraD. P. ChangV. ChekelianA. ChenB. G. CheonK. ChilikinR. ChistovK. ChoV. ChobanovaY. ChoiD. CinabroM. DanilovN. DashS. Di CarloZ. DoleD. DuttaS. EidelmanD. EpifanovH. FarhatJ. E. FastT. FerberB. G. FulsomV. GaurN. GabyshevA. GarmashP. GoldenzweigB. GolobD. GreenwaldK. HaraT. HaraJ. HasenbuschK. HayasakaH. HayashiiS. HiroseT. HoriguchiW. -S. HouK. InamiA. IshikawaR. ItohY. IwasakiI. JaegleH. B. JeonD. JoffeT. JuliusK. H. KangY. KatoP. KatrenkoT. KawasakiD. Y. KimJ. B. KimK. T. KimM. J. KimS. H. KimY. J. KimK. KinoshitaP. KodyS. KorparD. KotchetkovP. KrokovnyT. KuhrR. KumarY. -J. KwonJ. S. LangeC. H. LiL. LiY. LiL. Li GioiJ. LibbyD. LiventsevT. LuoM. MasudaT. MatsudaD. MatvienkoK. MiyabayashiH. MiyataR. MizukG. B. MohantyA. MollH. K. MoonK. R. NakamuraE. NakanoM. NakaoT. NanutK. J. NathZ. NatkaniecM. NayakK. NegishiN. K. NisarS. NishidaS. OgawaS. OkunoS. L. OlsenY. OnukiP. PakhlovG. PakhlovaB. PalC. -S. ParkS. PaulT. K. PedlarL. PesR. PestotnikM. PetriL. E. PiilonenM. V. PurohitJ. RauchA. RostomyanM. RozanskaY. SakaiS. SandilyaL. SanteljV. SavinovT. SchlO. SchneiderG. SchnellC. SchwandaA. J. SchwartzY. SeinoK. SenyoO. SeonM. E. SeviorV. ShebalinC. P. ShenT. -A. ShibataJ. -G. ShiuB. ShwartzF. SimonE. SolovievaS. StaniM. StariJ. F. StrubeT. SumiyoshiM. TakizawaU. TamponiF. TenchiniK. TrabelsiM. UchidaS. UnoP. UrquijoY. UshirodaY. UsovC. Van HulseG. VarnerA. VinokurovaV. VorobyevC. H. WangM. -Z. WangP. WangY. WatanabeK. M. WilliamsE. WonH. YamamotoJ. YamaokaY. YamashitaJ. YeltonY. YookC. Z. YuanY. YusaZ. P. ZhangV. ZhilichV. ZhukovaV. ZhulanovA. Zupanc

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.