Paper detail

Conditional Contrastive Learning for Improving Fairness in Self-Supervised Learning

Contrastive self-supervised learning (SSL) learns an embedding space that maps similar data pairs closer and dissimilar data pairs farther apart. Despite its success, one issue has been overlooked: the fairness aspect of representations learned using contrastive SSL. Without mitigation, contrastive SSL techniques can incorporate sensitive information such as gender or race and cause potentially unfair predictions on downstream tasks. In this paper, we propose a Conditional Contrastive Learning (CCL) approach to improve the fairness of contrastive SSL methods. Our approach samples positive and negative pairs from distributions conditioning on the sensitive attribute, or empirically speaking, sampling positive and negative pairs from the same gender or the same race. We show that our approach provably maximizes the conditional mutual information between the learned representations of the positive pairs, and reduces the effect of the sensitive attribute by taking it as the conditional variable. On seven fairness and vision datasets, we empirically demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves state-of-the-art downstream performances compared to unsupervised baselines and significantly improves the fairness of contrastive SSL models on multiple fairness metrics.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.