BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Yong-Chull Jang

Yong-Chull Jang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
hep-lathep-phnucl-th

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Nucleon form factors and the pion-nucleon sigma term

This talk summarizes the progress made since Lattice 2021 in understanding and controlling the contributions of towers of multihadron excited states with mass gaps starting lower than of radial excitations, and in increasing our confidence in the extraction of ground state nucleon matrix elements. The most clear evidence for multihadron excited state contributions (ESC) is in axial/pseudoscalar form factors that are required to satisfy the PCAC relation between them. The talk examines the broader question--which and how many of the theoretically allowed positive parity states $N(\textbf p)π(-\textbf p)$, $N(\textbf 0)π(\textbf 0)π(\textbf 0)$, $N(\textbf p)π(\textbf 0)$, $N(\textbf 0)π(\textbf p),\ \ldots$ make significant contributions to a given nucleon matrix element? New data for the axial, electric and magnetic form factors are presented. They continue to show trends observed in Ref[1]. The N${}^2$LO $χ$PT analysis of the ESC to the pion-nucleon sigma term, $σ_{πN}$, has been extended to include the $Δ$ as an explicit degree of freedom [2]. The conclusion reached in Ref [3] that $N π$ and $N ππ$ states each contribute about 10 MeV to $σ_{πN}$, and the consistency between the lattice result with $N π$ state included and the phenomenological estimate is not changed by this improvement.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

2021 Update on $\varepsilon_K$ with lattice QCD inputs

We present recent updates for $\varepsilon_K$ determined directly from the standard model (SM) with lattice QCD inputs such as $\hat{B}_K$, $|V_{cb}|$, $|V_{us}|$, $ξ_0$, $ξ_2$, $ξ_\text{LD}$, $f_K$, and $m_c$. We find that the standard model with exclusive $|V_{cb}|$ and other lattice QCD inputs describes only 66\% of the experimental value of $|\varepsilon_K|$ and does not explain its remaining 34\%, which leads to a strong tension in $|\varepsilon_K|$ at the $4.5σ\sim 3.7σ$ level between the SM theory and experiment. We also find that this tension disappears when we use the inclusive value of $|V_{cb}|$ obtained using the heavy quark expansion based on the QCD sum rule approach.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Discovering new physics in rare kaon decays

The decays and mixing of $K$ mesons are remarkably sensitive to the weak interactions of quarks and leptons at high energies. They provide important tests of the standard model at both first and second order in the Fermi constant $G_F$ and offer a window into possible new phenomena at energies as high as 1,000 TeV. These possibilities become even more compelling as the growing capabilities of lattice QCD make high-precision standard model predictions possible. Here we discuss and attempt to forecast some of these capabilities.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Excited states and precision results for nucleon charges and form factors

The exponentially falling signal-to-noise ratio in all nucleon correlation functions, and the presence of towers of multihadron excited states with relatively small mass gaps makes extraction of matrix elements of various operators within the ground state nucleon challenging. Theoretically, the allowed positive parity states with the smallest mass gaps are the $N(\bm p)π(-\bm p)$, $N(\bm 0)π(\bm 0)π(\bm 0)$, $N(\bm p)π(\bm 0)$, $N(\bm 0)π(\bm p),\ \ldots$, states. A priori, the contribution of these states arises at one loop in chiral perturbation theory ($χ$PT), however, in many cases the contributions are enhanced. In this talk, I will review four such cases: the correlation functions from which the axial form factors, electric and magnetic form factors, the $Θ$-term contribution to neutron electric dipole moment (nEDM), and the pion-nucleon sigma term are extracted. Including appropriate multihadron states in the analysis can lead to significantly different results compared to standard analyses with the mass gaps taken from fits to 2-point functions. The $χ$PT case for $N π$ states is the most clear in the axial/pseudoscalar form factors which need to satisfy the PCAC relation between them. Our analyses, supported by $χ$PT, suggests similarly large effects in the calculations of the $Θ$-term and the pion-nucleon sigma term that have significant phenomenological implications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Precision Nucleon Charges and Form Factors Using 2+1-flavor Lattice QCD

We present high statistics results for the isovector nucleon charges and form factors using seven ensembles of 2+1-flavor Wilson-clover fermions. The axial and pseudoscalar form factors obtained on each ensemble satisfy the PCAC relation once the lowest energy $Nπ$ excited state is included in the spectral decomposition of the correlation functions used for extracting the ground state matrix elements. Similarly, we find evidence that the $Nππ$ excited state contributes to the correlation functions with the vector current, consistent with the vector meson dominance model. The resulting form factors are consistent with the Kelly parameterization of the experimental electric and magnetic data. Our final estimates for the isovector charges are $g_{A}^{u-d} = 1.31(06)(05)_{sys}$, $g_{S}^{u-d} = 1.06(10)(06)_{sys}$, and $g_{T}^{u-d} = 0.95(05)(02)_{sys}$, where the first error is the overall analysis uncertainty and the second is an additional combined systematic uncertainty. The form factors yield: (i) the axial charge radius squared, ${\langle r_A^2 \rangle}^{u-d}=0.428(53)(30)_{sys}\ {\rm fm}^2$, (ii) the induced pseudoscalar charge, $g_P^\ast=7.9(7)(9)_{sys}$, (iii) the pion-nucleon coupling $g_{π{\rm NN}} = 12.4(1.2)$, (iv) the electric charge radius squared, ${\langle r_E^2 \rangle}^{u-d} = 0.85(12)(19)_{sys} \ {\rm fm}^2$, (v) the magnetic charge radius squared, ${\langle r_M^2 \rangle}^{u-d} = 0.71(19)(23)_{\rm sys} \ {\rm fm}^2$, and (vi) the magnetic moment $μ^{u-d} = 4.15(22)(10)_{\rm sys}$. All our results are consistent with phenomenological/experimental values but with larger errors. Lastly, we present a Padé parameterization of the axial, electric and magnetic form factors over the range $0.04< Q^2 <1$ GeV${}^2$ for phenomenological studies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Nucleon Axial Form Factors from Clover Fermion on 2+1+1-flavor HISQ Lattice

The nucleon axial form factors -- axial $G_A$, induced pseudoscalar $\widetilde{G}_P$ and pseudoscalar $G_P$ -- have displayed large systematics in lattice QCD calculations. The major symptoms were the violation of the partially conserved axial current (PCAC) relation between the three form factors, and the underestimation of the induced pseudoscalar coupling $g_P^\ast$ and the axial charge radius $r_A$ compared to phenomenological estimates. The small $g_P^\ast$ was a consequence of the failure of the pion-pole dominance (PPD) hypothesis, especially at low $M_π^2$. The small charge radius $r_A$ and the underestimate of $g_A$ were related. The dominant systematic responsible is the lack of inclusion of low-energy ($N π$) states that are not manifest in the multiexponential fit to the nucleon two-point correlator. We show that this low-energy state can be determined from the three-point correlator $\langle N A_4 N \rangle $ with the insertion of the temporal component of the axial current $A_4$ within the nucleon state, ie, the strategy labeled $S_{A4}$ [1]. Including this low-energy state in fits to control excited-state contamination (ESC) gives results for $g_A$, $r_A$, and $g_P^\ast$ that are consistent with experimental/phenomenological values. However, the systematic uncertainties, especially in data at small $Q^2$, are now much larger.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Nucleon charges and form factors using clover and HISQ ensembles

We present high statistics ($\mathcal{O}(2\times 10^5)$ measurements) preliminary results on (i) the isovector charges, $g^{u-d}_{A,S,T}$, and form factors, $G^{u-d}_E(Q^2)$, $G^{u-d}_M(Q^2)$, $G^{u-d}_A(Q^2)$, $\widetilde G^{u-d}_P(Q^2)$, $G^{u-d}_P(Q^2)$, on six 2+1-flavor Wilson-clover ensembles generated by the JLab/W&M/LANL/MIT collaboration with lattice parameters given in Table 1. Examples of the impact of using different estimates of the excited state spectra are given for the clover-on-clover data, and as discussed in [1], the biggest difference on including the lower energy (close to $Nπ$ and $Nππ$) states is in the axial channel. (ii) Flavor diagonal axial, tensor and scalar charges, $g^{u,d,s}_{A,S,T}$, are calculated with the clover-on-HISQ formulation using nine 2+1+1-flavor HISQ ensembles generated by the MILC collaboration [2] with lattice parameters given in Table 2. Once finished, the calculations of $g^{u,d,s}_{A,T}$ will update the results given in Refs.[3,4]. The estimates for $g^{u,d,s}_{S}$ and $σ_{Nπ}$ are new. Overall, a large part of the focus is on understanding the excited state contamination (ESC), and the results discussed provide a partial status report on developing defensible analyses strategies that include contributions of possible low-lying excited states to individual nucleon matrix elements.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Axial Vector Form Factors from Lattice QCD that Satisfy the PCAC Relation

Previous lattice QCD calculations of axial vector and pseudoscalar form factors show significant deviation from the partially conserved axial current (PCAC) relation between them. Since the original correlation functions satisfy PCAC, the observed deviations from the operator identity cast doubt on whether all the systematics in the extraction of form factors from the correlation functions are under control. We identify the problematic systematic as a missed excited state, whose energy as a function of the momentum transfer squared, $Q^2$, is determined from the analysis of the 3-point functions themselves. Its mass is much smaller than those of the excited states previously considered and including it impacts the extraction of all the ground state matrix elements. The form factors extracted using these mass/energy gaps satisfy PCAC and other consistency conditions, and validate the pion-pole dominance hypothesis. We also show that the extraction of the axial charge $g_A$ is very sensitive to the value of the mass gaps of the excited states used and current lattice data do not provide an unambiguous determination of these, unlike the $Q^2 \neq 0$ case. To highlight the differences and improvement between the conventional versus the new analysis strategy, we present a comparison of results obtained on a physical pion mass ensemble at $a\approx 0.0871\,\mathrm{fm}$. With the new strategy, we find $g_A = 1.30(6)$. A very significant improvement over previous lattice results is found for the axial charge radius $r_A = 0.74(6)\,\mathrm{fm}$, extracted using the $z$-expansion to parameterize the $Q^2$ behavior of $G_A(Q^2)$, and $g_P^\ast = 8.06(44)$ obtained using the pion pole-dominance ansatz to fit the $Q^2$ behavior of the induced pseudoscalar form factor $\widetilde{G}_P(Q^2)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Nucleon Electromagnetic Form Factors in the Continuum Limit from 2+1+1-flavor Lattice QCD

Results are presented for the nucleon isovector electromagnetic form factors using 11 ensembles generated by the MILC collaboration using the 2+1+1-flavors HISQ action. They span 4 lattice spacings $a \sim$ 0.06, 0.09, 0.12 and 0.15~fm and 3 values of $M_π\sim 135, 225$ and 315 MeV. High-statistics estimates are used to perform a simultaneous extrapolation in the lattice spacing, lattice volume and light-quark masses. The $Q^2$ dependence over the range 0.05-1.4 ${\rm GeV}^2$ is investigated using both the $z$-expansion and the dipole form. Final $z$-expansion estimates for the isovector r.m.s. radius are $r_E = 0.769(27)(30)$ fm $r_M = 0.671(48)(76)$ fm and $μ^{p-n} = 3.939(86)(138)$ Bohr magneton. The first error is the combined uncertainty from the leading-order analysis, and the second is an estimate of the additional uncertainty due to using the leading order chiral-continuum-finite-volume fits. The dipole estimates, $r_E = 0.765(11)(8)$ fm, $r_M = 0.704(21)(29)$ fm and $μ^{p-n} = 3.975(84)(125)$, are consistent with those from the $z$-expansion but with smaller errors. Our analysis highlights three points. First, all data from the eleven ensembles and existing lattice data on, or close to, physical mass ensembles from other collaborations collapses more clearly onto a single curve when plotted versus $Q^2/M_N^2$ as compared to $Q^2$ with the scale set by quantities other than $M_N$. The difference between these two analyses is indicative of discretization errors, some of which presumably cancel when the data are plotted versus $Q^2/M_N^2$. Second, the size of the remaining deviation of this common curve from the Kelly curve is small and can be accounted for by statistical and possible systematic uncertainties. Third, to improve lattice estimates, high statistics data for $Q^2 < 0.1$ ${\rm GeV}^2$ are needed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access