Paper detail

Nucleon Electromagnetic Form Factors in the Continuum Limit from 2+1+1-flavor Lattice QCD

Results are presented for the nucleon isovector electromagnetic form factors using 11 ensembles generated by the MILC collaboration using the 2+1+1-flavors HISQ action. They span 4 lattice spacings $a \sim$ 0.06, 0.09, 0.12 and 0.15~fm and 3 values of $M_π\sim 135, 225$ and 315 MeV. High-statistics estimates are used to perform a simultaneous extrapolation in the lattice spacing, lattice volume and light-quark masses. The $Q^2$ dependence over the range 0.05-1.4 ${\rm GeV}^2$ is investigated using both the $z$-expansion and the dipole form. Final $z$-expansion estimates for the isovector r.m.s. radius are $r_E = 0.769(27)(30)$ fm $r_M = 0.671(48)(76)$ fm and $μ^{p-n} = 3.939(86)(138)$ Bohr magneton. The first error is the combined uncertainty from the leading-order analysis, and the second is an estimate of the additional uncertainty due to using the leading order chiral-continuum-finite-volume fits. The dipole estimates, $r_E = 0.765(11)(8)$ fm, $r_M = 0.704(21)(29)$ fm and $μ^{p-n} = 3.975(84)(125)$, are consistent with those from the $z$-expansion but with smaller errors. Our analysis highlights three points. First, all data from the eleven ensembles and existing lattice data on, or close to, physical mass ensembles from other collaborations collapses more clearly onto a single curve when plotted versus $Q^2/M_N^2$ as compared to $Q^2$ with the scale set by quantities other than $M_N$. The difference between these two analyses is indicative of discretization errors, some of which presumably cancel when the data are plotted versus $Q^2/M_N^2$. Second, the size of the remaining deviation of this common curve from the Kelly curve is small and can be accounted for by statistical and possible systematic uncertainties. Third, to improve lattice estimates, high statistics data for $Q^2 < 0.1$ ${\rm GeV}^2$ are needed.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.