Paper detail

Precision Nucleon Charges and Form Factors Using 2+1-flavor Lattice QCD

We present high statistics results for the isovector nucleon charges and form factors using seven ensembles of 2+1-flavor Wilson-clover fermions. The axial and pseudoscalar form factors obtained on each ensemble satisfy the PCAC relation once the lowest energy $Nπ$ excited state is included in the spectral decomposition of the correlation functions used for extracting the ground state matrix elements. Similarly, we find evidence that the $Nππ$ excited state contributes to the correlation functions with the vector current, consistent with the vector meson dominance model. The resulting form factors are consistent with the Kelly parameterization of the experimental electric and magnetic data. Our final estimates for the isovector charges are $g_{A}^{u-d} = 1.31(06)(05)_{sys}$, $g_{S}^{u-d} = 1.06(10)(06)_{sys}$, and $g_{T}^{u-d} = 0.95(05)(02)_{sys}$, where the first error is the overall analysis uncertainty and the second is an additional combined systematic uncertainty. The form factors yield: (i) the axial charge radius squared, ${\langle r_A^2 \rangle}^{u-d}=0.428(53)(30)_{sys}\ {\rm fm}^2$, (ii) the induced pseudoscalar charge, $g_P^\ast=7.9(7)(9)_{sys}$, (iii) the pion-nucleon coupling $g_{π{\rm NN}} = 12.4(1.2)$, (iv) the electric charge radius squared, ${\langle r_E^2 \rangle}^{u-d} = 0.85(12)(19)_{sys} \ {\rm fm}^2$, (v) the magnetic charge radius squared, ${\langle r_M^2 \rangle}^{u-d} = 0.71(19)(23)_{\rm sys} \ {\rm fm}^2$, and (vi) the magnetic moment $μ^{u-d} = 4.15(22)(10)_{\rm sys}$. All our results are consistent with phenomenological/experimental values but with larger errors. Lastly, we present a Padé parameterization of the axial, electric and magnetic form factors over the range $0.04< Q^2 <1$ GeV${}^2$ for phenomenological studies.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.